Patent US5652458A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4682999A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4682999A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Methods for enhancing the productivity of plants

Assignee: Entek Corp
•
Filing: 1985-12-11
•
Granted: 1987-07-28
•
Expires: 2005-12-11
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The productivity of plants is enhanced by enhancing one or more physiological responses of photosynthesizing plants by contacting the foliage of such plants during the early stages, i.e. about the first half, of the grand response period for the selected physiological response with a solution containing biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into the plant a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the selected physiological response.

Inventors

  • 👤 Donald C. Young

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 09:18
CPC Classifications
C; C05; C05C; C05C9/00

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 64
Claim 1
Independent Claim 66 words
A method for enhancing a selected physiological response of plants other than beets and sugarbeets which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand response period for said physiological response with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plant a non-phytoltixic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance said selected response.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 66 words
A method for enhancing a selected physiological response of plants other than beets and sugarbeets which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand response period for said physiological response with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plant a non-phytoltixic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance said selected response.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said physiological response is selected from the group consisting of blossom set, fruit set, fruit growth, grain-head filling, root-crop development, and sugar accumulation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein physiological response is other than a vegetative growth response.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 11 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is aqueous.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution comprises a member selected from the group consisting of surfactants, polar solvents other than water, and combinations thereof.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants are flowering plants, and said solution is applied to said foliage within the period between about 3 days before first bloom and about 3 days after first bloom.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method defined in claim 6 wherein said solution is applied to said foliage within about 1 day of first bloom.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method defined in claim 6 wherein said plants are selected from the group consisting of ornamental and fruit-bearing flowering plants.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise fruit-bearing plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants within the period between about 3 days before first fruit set and the time at which said fruit are about 1/2 full size.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method defined in claim 9 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at least twice during said period.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method defined in claim 6 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at least twice during said period.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at least twice during about the first half of said grand response period.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 45 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise grain-bearing plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants within a period of about 3 days before to about 10 days after the commencement of the grain-head filling stage of growth.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method defined in claim 13 wherein said grain-bearing plants are selected from the group consisting of wheat, rice, corn, barley, oats, rye, and combinations thereof.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants are grain-bearing plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand response period for grain-head filling.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise root-crop plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand growth period for the development of the harvestable portion of the roots of said plants.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method defined in claim 16 wherein said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of potatoes, carrots, garlic, turnips, onions, peanuts, parsnips, radishes, shallots, sweet potatoes and yams.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method defined in claim 9 wherein said fruit-bearing plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of stone fruits, small fruits, pome fruits, citrus, nuts, and fruiting vegetables.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 41 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise cotton plants, and said solution is contacted with the foliage of said cotton plants within a period defined by about 3 days before to about 10 days after first boll set.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise cotton plants, and said solution is contacted with the foliage of said plants within the first half of the grand response period for boll growth on said plants.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 45 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of vegetative forage plants, and said solution is contacted with the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand growth period of said plants.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method defined in claim 21 wherein said forage plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of alfalfa, hay, and combinations thereof.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method defined in claim 22 wherein said forage plants are periodically harvested by cutting and are allowed to re-grow after cutting, and said solution is applied to the foliage of the re-growing plants within a period of about 2 to about 10 days after said cutting.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 51 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of seed and pod vegetables, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand growth period of the seeds or pods of said plants.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 53 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of deciduous trees, shrubs and vines, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants in the spring within the period from about first leaf emergence to about 2 weeks after first leaf emergence.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 54 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise sugar-producing plants selected from the group consisting of sugarcane, and fruiting plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants after the beginning of the sugar accumulation cycle in said plants and before said sugar accumulation cycle is about 1/2 complete.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 45 words
The method defined in claim 26 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 30 pounds of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least 0.5.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 51 words
The method defined in claim 27 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 10 pounds of biuret per acre, and said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of citrus, pome fruits and small fruits.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 30 pounds of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.02.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 10 pounds of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 5 pounds of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 46 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to about 1 ounce to about 20 pounds of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.5.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method defined in claim 33 wherein the nitrogen content of said solution consists essentially of biuret.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 55 words
The method defined in claim 1 wherein said plants comprise flowering-fruiting plants, and said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants within the period of about 3 days before to about 3 days after first bloom and again within a period of about 3 days before to about 1 week after fruit set.
Claim 37
Independent Claim 62 words
A method for enhancing the flower set of flowering plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the blossom-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plant a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the blossom set of said plants.
Claim 38
Independent Claim 62 words
A method for enhancing the flower set of flowering plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the blossom-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plant a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the blossom set of said plants.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 87 words
The method defined in claim 36 wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants within a period of about 3 days before first bloom to about 3 days after first bloom, said plants comprise a member selected from the group consisting of ornamental and fruit-bearing flowering plants, said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 40
Independent Claim 99 words
A method for enhancing the fruit set of fruit-bearing plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the fruit-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the fruit-set of said plants, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 41
Independent Claim 99 words
A method for enhancing the fruit set of fruit-bearing plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the fruit-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the fruit-set of said plants, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 42
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for enhancing the grain production of grain-bearing plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during the first half of the grain-head filling period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the grain production of said plants, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 43
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for enhancing the grain production of grain-bearing plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during the first half of the grain-head filling period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the grain production of said plants, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 44
Independent Claim 134 words
A method for enhancing the production of harvestable root parts by root crops selected from the group consisting of potatoes, carrots, garlic, turnips, onions, peanuts, parsnips, radishes, shallots and yams which comprises contacting the foliage of said root crops during about the first half of the grand growth period for the development of the harvestable root parts of said root crops with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said root crops a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the production of said harvestable root parts, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said root crops at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 45
Independent Claim 134 words
A method for enhancing the production of harvestable root parts by root crops selected from the group consisting of potatoes, carrots, garlic, turnips, onions, peanuts, parsnips, radishes, shallots and yams which comprises contacting the foliage of said root crops during about the first half of the grand growth period for the development of the harvestable root parts of said root crops with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said root crops a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance the production of said harvestable root parts, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said root crops at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.1.
Claim 46
Independent Claim 91 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the blossom-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 47
Independent Claim 91 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the blossom-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 48
Independent Claim 90 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the boll-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 49
Independent Claim 90 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the boll-set period for said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 50
Independent Claim 96 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand growth period for cotton boll growth on said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 51
Independent Claim 96 words
A method for enhancing the cotton production of cotton plants which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand growth period for cotton boll growth on said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 52
Independent Claim 103 words
A method for enhancing the sugar production of sugar producing plants selected from the group consisting of sugarcane, and fruiting plants, which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the sugar accumulation period in said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 53
Independent Claim 103 words
A method for enhancing the sugar production of sugar producing plants selected from the group consisting of sugarcane, and fruiting plants, which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the sugar accumulation period in said plants with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret, wherein said solution is applied to the foliage of said plants at a rate corresponding to at least about 1 ounce of biuret per acre, and the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.05.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method defined in claim 44 wherein said plants are selected from the group consisting of stone fruits, small fruits, pome fruits, citrus, nuts, and fruiting vegetables.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 36 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 38 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 39 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 40 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 41 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 42 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 44 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.
Claim 62
Independent Claim 127 words
A method for enhancing a physiological response selected from the group consisting of blossom set, fruit set, fruit growth, grain-head filling, root-crop developement, sugar accumulation, and combinations thereof, of plants selected from the group consisting of flowering plants, fruiting plants, fruiting vegetables, seed and pod vegetables, nut crops, grain-bearing plants, carrots, chicory, garlic, onions, parsnips, potatoes, radishes, rutabagas, salsify, shallots, turnips and yams, which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand response period for said physiological response with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance said physiological response, wherein the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.5.
Claim 63
Independent Claim 127 words
A method for enhancing a physiological response selected from the group consisting of blossom set, fruit set, fruit growth, grain-head filling, root-crop developement, sugar accumulation, and combinations thereof, of plants selected from the group consisting of flowering plants, fruiting plants, fruiting vegetables, seed and pod vegetables, nut crops, grain-bearing plants, carrots, chicory, garlic, onions, parsnips, potatoes, radishes, rutabagas, salsify, shallots, turnips and yams, which comprises contacting the foliage of said plants during about the first half of the grand response period for said physiological response with a solution comprising dissolved biuret in an amount and under conditions sufficient to introduce into said plants a non-phytotoxic amount of biuret sufficient to enhance said physiological response, wherein the biuret/urea weight ratio in said solution is at least about 0.5.
Claim 64
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method defined in claim 53 wherein said solution is essentially free of urea.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3185731A Cited
US3287407A Cited
US3318951A Cited
US3251879A Cited
US3255246A Cited
US3232964A Cited
US3711273A Cited
US3860411A Cited
US3903158A Cited
US3903158B1 Cited
US4231960A Cited
US4345099A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1990-07-27 1991-01-26 1991-07-28 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1994-07-27 1995-01-26 1995-07-28 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1998-07-27 1999-01-26 1999-07-28 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag