US4679866A — Method for ascertaining the set-point braking mom…

Claim 1

Independent Claim 281 words

A method for ascertaining a set-point braking moment for various wheels of a vehicle, using input variables Z(K+1) i, which are dependent on wheel speeds V R of these wheels and on a vehicle speed V F wherein i is 2-n for the variable dependent on the wheel speeds and Z(K+1) 1 for the variable dependent on the vehicle speed, characterized in that a Kalman filter is used in such a manner comprising the steps of (a) forming at predetermined time intervals T, a difference between input signals Z(K+1) i and simulation values Z(K+1) i ascertained in the Kalman filter based on previous measurements; (b) converting these differences Z(K+1) i , by multiplication with a Kalman amplification factor K that forms a matrix, into 2n+1 difference values X(k+1/k+1) i ; (c) forming respective sums of these difference values X(K+1/K+1) i and corresponding simulation values X(k+1/K) i ; (d) delivering these summed values X(K+1/K+1) i to a regulator, which compares the summed values corresponding to the wheel speeds and the vehicle speed to ascertain signals MB i corresponding to braking moments for the wheel brakes; (e) storing in a memory the summed values, after multiplication by a transition matrix φ and after addition to the signals MB i multiplied by a matrix Γ 1 , as simulation values X(k+2/k+1) for the next sum formation; (f) and storing the simulation values X(k+2/k+1), after multiplication by a measurement matrix H, in a second memory as a simulation value Z(k+2) for the next measurement, wherein the terms (k+m, and k+m/k+n) are corresponding variables used in the evaluation of different cycles wherein m and n denote the cycle number, and wherein T is the cycle time.

Claim 2

Independent Claim 281 words

A method for ascertaining a set-point braking moment for various wheels of a vehicle, using input variables Z(K+1) i, which are dependent on wheel speeds V R of these wheels and on a vehicle speed V F wherein i is 2-n for the variable dependent on the wheel speeds and Z(K+1) 1 for the variable dependent on the vehicle speed, characterized in that a Kalman filter is used in such a manner comprising the steps of (a) forming at predetermined time intervals T, a difference between input signals Z(K+1) i and simulation values Z(K+1) i ascertained in the Kalman filter based on previous measurements; (b) converting these differences Z(K+1) i , by multiplication with a Kalman amplification factor K that forms a matrix, into 2n+1 difference values X(k+1/k+1) i ; (c) forming respective sums of these difference values X(K+1/K+1) i and corresponding simulation values X(k+1/K) i ; (d) delivering these summed values X(K+1/K+1) i to a regulator, which compares the summed values corresponding to the wheel speeds and the vehicle speed to ascertain signals MB i corresponding to braking moments for the wheel brakes; (e) storing in a memory the summed values, after multiplication by a transition matrix φ and after addition to the signals MB i multiplied by a matrix Γ 1 , as simulation values X(k+2/k+1) for the next sum formation; (f) and storing the simulation values X(k+2/k+1), after multiplication by a measurement matrix H, in a second memory as a simulation value Z(k+2) for the next measurement, wherein the terms (k+m, and k+m/k+n) are corresponding variables used in the evaluation of different cycles wherein m and n denote the cycle number, and wherein T is the cycle time.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 230 words

A method as defined by claim 1, which comprises a step of ascertaining the Kalman amplification factor matrix K(k+m) in each case after the following method progression comprising the steps of: (a) multiplying a transposed transition matrix φ T by a covariance matrix P(k/k) ascertained in the previous cycle, and multiplying this product by a transition matrix φ; (b) adding this product to a constant matrix Γ 2 ·Q·Γ 2 T , so as to obtain a prediction for a new covariance matrix P(k+1/k); (c) multiplying this prediction by a transposed measurement matrix H T , storing the result, P(k+1/k)·H T , in memory and multiplying this product by the measurement matrix H, yielding a result E 1 ; (d) multiplying the input values of the regulator by a matrix S and adding this product to a constant matrix R o and to the result E 1 , producing the result E 2 ; (e) inverting this result E 2 (1/E 2 ), and multiplying the stored result P(k+1/k)·H T thereby, resulting in the Kalman amplification matrix K(k+1); (f) multiplying this matrix by the measurement matrix H and subtracting the result from an identity matrix I; (g) multiplying this difference, I-K(k+1)·H, by the already ascertained prediction for the new covariance matrix P(k+1/k+1), resulting in a new covariance matrix P(k+1/k+1) for calculating a Kalman amplification matrix K(k+2) for the next cycle.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 148 words

A method as defined by claim 1, characterized in that in the regulator, after a definition of a formula ##EQU10## comprises the steps of ascertaining a signal λ soi that corresponds to an instantaneously optimal slip for each wheel i, and that with this optimal slip signal λ soi and an instantaneous slip signal λi of each wheel, ascertaining the braking moment signal MBi for each wheel, and in order to influence the brake using the braking moment to adapt the wheel slip λi to a set-point slip value λ x soi ≦ λ soi , wherein the variables in the formula have the following meanings: ##EQU11## VF=vehicle speed signal=(x(k/k)) VRi=circumferential speed of the wheel B 1 =a constant (e.g., 1.0) ##EQU12## A1=constant (e.g., 0.03) A2=constant (e.g., 0.22) Di max =maximum braking force of the wheel FZi=tire/road contact force of wheel 1 R i =the dynamic tire radius.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 89 words

A method as defined by claim 3, comprising the steps of ascertaining a correction ΔMi for an instantaneous braking moment MBi based on equations ΔMi=MH+(λi-λ.sup.x.sub.soi)·DMDL for λi>λ.sup.x.sub.soi (A) or ΔM=MH+(λi-λ.sup.x.sub.soi)·DMDL for λi<λ.sup.x.sub.soi (B) and from this, based on an equation MBi.sup.x =MBi-ΔMi ascertaining a new braking moment MBi x , this being made operative only if MBi x is smaller than the braking moment directed by a driver, wherein MH is a small constant braking moment and DMDL is a predetermined slope of the braking moment over the slip.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 38 words

A method as defined by claim 4, which comprises replacing λ x soi in the equations and inequalities A and B by λ.sup.x.sub.soi +λ.sub.H in A λ.sup.x.sub.soi -λ.sub.H in B λ H is a small constant slip value.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 55 words

A method as defined by claim 3, which comprises the steps of ascertaining a deviation δ i x of the actual slip from the set-point slip λ x soi according to the equation ##EQU13## and ascertaining the braking moment correction Mi (k+1) in accordance with the equation ##EQU14## where Kr, Kd and Ki are constants.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 40 words

A method as defined by claim 6, characterized in that the new braking moment is either the braking moment MFi directed by the driver or--if it is smaller--the braking moment MBi.sup.x =MBi-ΔMi(k+1) where MBi is the previously ascertained braking moment.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 48 words

A method as defined by claim 3, characterized in that the new braking moment MB i * is determined in accordance with the equation ##EQU15## wherein the following conditions apply: ##EQU16## where Ri=tire radius Ci=constant VF=vehicle speed δ imax =constant (e.g., 5) δi=λ i -λ x soi .

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 25 words

A method as defined by claim 8, characterized in that only an attenuated adaptation of the braking moment to the ascertained value MBi* takes place.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 150 words

A method as defined by claim 2, characterized in that in a regulator, after a definition of a formula ##EQU17## comprises the steps of ascertaining a signal λ soi that corresponds to an instantaneously optimal slip for each wheel i, and that with optimal slip signal λ soi and an instantaneous slip signal λi of the each wheel, ascertaining the braking moment signal MBi for each wheel, and in order to influence the brake using the braking moment to adapt the wheel slip λi to a set-point slip value λ x soi ≦ λ soi , wherein the variables in the formula have the following meanings: ##EQU18## VF=vehicle speed signal=(x(k/k)) VR i =circumferential speed of the wheel B 1 =a constant (e.g., 1.0) ##EQU19## A1=constant (e.g., 0.03) A2=constant (e.g., 0.22) Di max =maximum braking force of the wheel FZi=tire/road contact force of wheel 1 R i =the dynamic tire radius.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1990-07-13	1991-01-12	1991-07-14	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	1994-07-13	1995-01-12	1995-07-14	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	1998-07-13	1999-01-12	1999-07-14	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Method for ascertaining the set-point braking moment for the various wheels of a vehicle

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag