Patent US4666250A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4666250A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Interference filter design using flip-flop optimization

Assignee: Boeing North American Inc
•
Filing: 1985-04-16
•
Granted: 1987-05-19
•
Expires: 2005-04-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An antireflective optical film is placed between an incident media and a substrate to effect minimal reflectivity from the incident media-substrate interface over a broad spectral band. The film is designed by selecting a first material with a low refractive index and a second material with a high refractive index. A theoretical film is defined with a plurality of thin layers of equal thickness. The low refractive index or the high refractive index material is specified for each layer in the film. The reflectivity of the theoretical film is evaluated. The refractive index of one of the layers is changed to the alternate index and the reflectivity of the defined film is reevaluated. If the reflectivity of the film is improved, the alternate refractive index is assigned to the changed layer. The steps of changing, reevaluating, and assigning are repeated for each of the layers in the film until no further improvement in the reflectivity of the film is obtained. The thin layers may be defined with equal physical or optical thickness and should be substantially thinner than wavelengths within the spectral band to be reflected by the film. The initial refractive index profile may be defined with all of the layers having the low refractive index, all of the layers having the high refractive index, the layers having alternately low and high refractive indices, or such that the initial refractive index profile for the film approximates a predetermined gradient index profile.

Inventors

  • 👤 William H. Southwell

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 15:50
CPC Classifications
G; G02; G02B; G02B1/00; G02B1/10; G02B1/11; G02B1/113; G02B1/115; G02B27/00; G02B27/0012

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 159 words
A method of designing an antireflective optical film for placement between an incident media and a substrate to effect minimal reflectively from the incident media-substrate interface over a broad spectral band, comprising the steps of: selecting a first material with a low refractive index and a second material with a high refractive index; defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of either equal physical or either optical thickness; specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer in the film; evaluating the reflectivity of the theoretical film; changing the refractive index of one of the layers to the alternate index; reevaluating the reflectivity of the defined film; assigning the alternate refractive index to the changed layer if the reflectivity of the film is improved; repeating the steps of changing, reevaluating, and assigning for each of the layers in the film until no further improvement in the reflectivity of the film is obtained.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 159 words
A method of designing an antireflective optical film for placement between an incident media and a substrate to effect minimal reflectively from the incident media-substrate interface over a broad spectral band, comprising the steps of: selecting a first material with a low refractive index and a second material with a high refractive index; defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of either equal physical or either optical thickness; specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer in the film; evaluating the reflectivity of the theoretical film; changing the refractive index of one of the layers to the alternate index; reevaluating the reflectivity of the defined film; assigning the alternate refractive index to the changed layer if the reflectivity of the film is improved; repeating the steps of changing, reevaluating, and assigning for each of the layers in the film until no further improvement in the reflectivity of the film is obtained.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining each layer to be substantially thinner than wavelengths within the spectral band to be reflected by the film.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of equal physical thickness.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of equal optical thickness.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying the low refractive index for each layer in the film.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying the high refractive index for each layer in the film.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 56 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises alternately specifying the low refractive index and the high refractive index for successive layers, such that the initial refractive index profile for the film alternates from high to low throughout the film.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 53 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying a low refractive index or a high refractive index for each layer such that the refractive index profile for the film corresponds to a predetermined gradient index profile.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 155 words
An antireflective optical film for placement between an incident media and a substrate to effect minimal reflectivity from the incident-substrate interface over a broad spectral band, designed by the steps of: selecting a first material with a low refractive index and a second material with a high refractive index; defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of either equal physical or equal optical thickness; specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer in the film; evaluating the reflectivity of the theoretical film; changing the refractive index of one of the layers to the alternate index; reevaluating the reflectivity of the defined film; assigning the alternate refractive index to the changed layer if the reflectivity of the film is improved; repeating the steps of changing, reevaluating, and assigning for each of the layers in the film until no further improvement in the reflectivity of the film is obtained.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 155 words
An antireflective optical film for placement between an incident media and a substrate to effect minimal reflectivity from the incident-substrate interface over a broad spectral band, designed by the steps of: selecting a first material with a low refractive index and a second material with a high refractive index; defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of either equal physical or equal optical thickness; specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer in the film; evaluating the reflectivity of the theoretical film; changing the refractive index of one of the layers to the alternate index; reevaluating the reflectivity of the defined film; assigning the alternate refractive index to the changed layer if the reflectivity of the film is improved; repeating the steps of changing, reevaluating, and assigning for each of the layers in the film until no further improvement in the reflectivity of the film is obtained.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 34 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining each layer to be substantially thinner than wavelengths within the spectral band to be reflected by the film.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 29 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of equal physical thickness.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 29 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of defining a theoretical film further comprises defining a theoretical film comprising a plurality of thin layers of equal optical thickness.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 35 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying the low refractive index for each layer in the film.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 35 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying the high refractive index for each layer in the film.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 56 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises alternately specifying the low refractive index and the high refractive index for successive layers, such that the initial refractive index profile for the film alternates from high to low throughout the film.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 53 words
The film of claim 9, wherein the step of specifying the low refractive index or the high refractive index for each layer further comprises specifying a low refractive index or a high refractive index for each layer such that the refractive index profile for the film corresponds to a predetermined gradient index profile.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1990-05-18 1990-11-17 1991-05-19 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1994-05-18 1994-11-17 1995-05-19 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1998-05-18 1998-11-17 1999-05-19 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag