Patent US4641235A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4641235A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process control apparatus with process dependent switching between process control modes
Assignee: Toshiba Corp
•
Filing: 1984-09-25
•
Granted: 1987-02-03
•
Expires: 2004-09-25
Abstract
Abstract The process control apparatus according to the present invention is adapted to control the process automatically in compliance with the state of the process characteristics. In the process control apparatus, when the process characteristics are found to be in a steady state, the control is performed by a first process control operational means suited for sample controlling the process according to the control constants for the first process control operational means as determined during the control of a second process control operational means, while, when the process characteristics vary frequently, the control is performed by the second process control operational means which is suited from sample controlling the process.
Inventors
- 👤 Takashi Shigemasa
- 👤 Yoshinori Ichikawa
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 16:14
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
364 words
A process control apparatus which comprises: a. first process control operational means (40) adapted to control a process in a first control mode by producing a first control signal u(k)=u o (k) when the characteristics of the process to be controlled are in a steady state; b. second process control operational means (5) including first control operational means (13) and least square identification means (8), adapted to control the process in a second control mode by producing a second control signal u(k)=u 1 (k) when the characteristics of the process change rapidly; c. first detection means (15) for detecting the steady state of the characteristics of the process in accordance with a predetermined factor from said least square identification means and for producing a first detection signal therefrom; d. second detection means (14) for detecting rapid changes in the characteristics of the process in accordance with a process output signal y(k), a control signal u(k) from and to the process, and an identification signal θ(k) from said least square identification means and for producing a second detection signal therefrom; e. a mode control unit (16) responsive to one of the first detection signal and the second detection signal, for producing a dynamic characteristic change confirmation signal Δr(k) and a change-over signal, or an operation execution command signal in accordance with the first or second detection signal; f. change-over switch means (6) selectively switched to either said first process control operational means or to said second process control operational means in accordance with the change-over signal from said mode control unit means; and g. a control constant operation unit (18) responsive to the operational execution command signal from said mode control unit, for calculating control parameters in the first control mode in accordance with the identification signal θ(k) from the least square identification means so as to produce the first control signal u o (k), whereby said switch means is changed-over to the second process control operational means when the characteristics of the process are detected to be frequently changing while it is changed-over to the first process control operational means when the characteristics of the process are detected to be in the steady state.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
364 words
A process control apparatus which comprises: a. first process control operational means (40) adapted to control a process in a first control mode by producing a first control signal u(k)=u o (k) when the characteristics of the process to be controlled are in a steady state; b. second process control operational means (5) including first control operational means (13) and least square identification means (8), adapted to control the process in a second control mode by producing a second control signal u(k)=u 1 (k) when the characteristics of the process change rapidly; c. first detection means (15) for detecting the steady state of the characteristics of the process in accordance with a predetermined factor from said least square identification means and for producing a first detection signal therefrom; d. second detection means (14) for detecting rapid changes in the characteristics of the process in accordance with a process output signal y(k), a control signal u(k) from and to the process, and an identification signal θ(k) from said least square identification means and for producing a second detection signal therefrom; e. a mode control unit (16) responsive to one of the first detection signal and the second detection signal, for producing a dynamic characteristic change confirmation signal Δr(k) and a change-over signal, or an operation execution command signal in accordance with the first or second detection signal; f. change-over switch means (6) selectively switched to either said first process control operational means or to said second process control operational means in accordance with the change-over signal from said mode control unit means; and g. a control constant operation unit (18) responsive to the operational execution command signal from said mode control unit, for calculating control parameters in the first control mode in accordance with the identification signal θ(k) from the least square identification means so as to produce the first control signal u o (k), whereby said switch means is changed-over to the second process control operational means when the characteristics of the process are detected to be frequently changing while it is changed-over to the first process control operational means when the characteristics of the process are detected to be in the steady state.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first control mode is a PID control and said second control mode is a minimum variance control.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
45 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first process control operational means is a PID control operational means, said second process control operational means is a self-tuning regulator, and said first control operational means is a minimum variance control operational means.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first process control operational means is a combination of an I-control operational means and a PD-control operational means.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
21 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first control operational means is a deadbeat control operational means.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said first control operational means is a pole assignment control operational means.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the dynamic characteristic change confirmation signal Δr(k) from the mode control means is applied to deviation calculating means in the first process control operational means.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
61 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said control constant operation unit further comprises s-transfer function operational unit (17) for calculating a transfer function of the process and PID control constant operational unit (18) for calculating proportional gain Kc, integral time constant Ti, and differential time constant Td from the s-transfer function calculated in the s-transfer function unit.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
24 words
The process control apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said predetermined factor from the least square identification means is a forgetting factor λ(k).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
258 words
A process control method for a process having a first process control operational means and a second process control operational means, which comprises the steps of: a. calculating an error η(k) of an estimated model for the process to be controlled in accordance with a control signal u(k), a process output signal y(k), and an identification signal θ(k) from the following equations; ##EQU14## b. determining if the error η(k) thus calculated is larger than a predetermined first threshold level L 1 for determining a characteristic change in the process; c. adding a dynamic characteristic change confirmation signal Δr(k) to deviation calculating means in the first process control operational means so as to observe actual changes in the process characteristics; d. determining if the error η(k) is larger than a predetermined second threshold level L 2 or if L 1 <η(k)<L 2 ; e. switching the process control from a first control mode to a second control mode when the error η(k) is larger than the predetermined second threshold level L 2 ; f. correcting only a d.c. component d' of the error η(k) to be zero without switching to the second control mode but maintaining the first control mode when the change in the error of the estimated model is small, i.e., L 1 <η(k)<L 2 in accordance with the result of the second determination; and g. switching the process control from the second control mode to the first control mode when the process becomes a steady state, such that η(k)<L 1 with the residual lε(k) being small.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
258 words
A process control method for a process having a first process control operational means and a second process control operational means, which comprises the steps of: a. calculating an error η(k) of an estimated model for the process to be controlled in accordance with a control signal u(k), a process output signal y(k), and an identification signal θ(k) from the following equations; ##EQU14## b. determining if the error η(k) thus calculated is larger than a predetermined first threshold level L 1 for determining a characteristic change in the process; c. adding a dynamic characteristic change confirmation signal Δr(k) to deviation calculating means in the first process control operational means so as to observe actual changes in the process characteristics; d. determining if the error η(k) is larger than a predetermined second threshold level L 2 or if L 1 <η(k)<L 2 ; e. switching the process control from a first control mode to a second control mode when the error η(k) is larger than the predetermined second threshold level L 2 ; f. correcting only a d.c. component d' of the error η(k) to be zero without switching to the second control mode but maintaining the first control mode when the change in the error of the estimated model is small, i.e., L 1 <η(k)<L 2 in accordance with the result of the second determination; and g. switching the process control from the second control mode to the first control mode when the process becomes a steady state, such that η(k)<L 1 with the residual lε(k) being small.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
28 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the first control mode is a PID control and the second control mode is a minimum variance control.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
38 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the minimum variation control is performed at the initial condition of the process control when the characteristics of the process are not yet stable during a transient period.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
22 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the first control mode is a combination of I-control and PD control.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the second control mode is a deadbeat control.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
19 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the second control mode is a pole assignment control.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
38 words
The process control method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the minimum variation control is performed at the initial condition of the process control when the characteristics of the process are not yet stable during a transient period.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1990-02-02 | 1990-08-04 | 1991-02-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1994-02-02 | 1994-08-04 | 1995-02-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1998-02-02 | 1998-08-04 | 1999-02-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |