US4626445A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of manufacturing an optical interference authenticating device
Assignee: National Research Council Canada
•
Filing: 1985-11-12
•
Granted: 1986-12-02
•
Expires: 2005-11-12
Abstract
Abstract Hard to simulate, readily distinguishable from counterfeits, optical interference authenticating devices are provided by depositing two coatings on a substrate, each coating comprising at least one optical interference layer, the material of each layer being selected so that the two coatings together and separately have different spectral reflectance and spectral transmittance characteristics at different angles of incidence of light thereon. The substrate may be, for example, a polyester film and a first one of the coatings is sufficiently radiation absorbing of, say, infrared radiation that at least one portion of that coating can be removed by an infrared laser beam through, for example, a mask to provide a readily distinguishable pattern on the substrate. The first coating may be, for example, a multilayer absorber coating containing Inconel, aluminum or some other suitable material, while the other coating, which is insufficiently radiation absorbing by, for example, infrared radiation to be substantially resistant to excavation solely by the infrared laser beam may be, for example, a multilayer coating of ZrO2 or SiO2, etc. If the first coating is outermost from the substrate then only the first coating will be excavated by the infrared laser beam. If the second coating is outermost from the substrate then both the first and second coatings will be excavated by the infrared laser beam.
Inventors
- 👤 Jerzy A. Dobrowolski
- 👤 Allan J. Waldorf
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 00:39
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06K; G06K19/00; G06K19/06; G06K19/08; G06K19/10; G06K19/14; G07; G07F; G07F7/00; G07F7/08; G07F7/086; G09; G09F; G09F3/00; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T428/00; Y10T428/26; Y10T428/261
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
198 words
A method of manufacturing an optical interference authenticating device comprising: (a) depositing two coatings on a substrate, each of the said coatings comprising at least one optical interference layer, the materials of the layers being selected so that the two coatings together and separately have different, known spectral reflectance and spectral transmittance characteristics, at different angles of incidence of light thereon, (i) a first one of the said coatings being sufficiently radiation-absorbing for electromagnetic radiation of a particular wavelength to be excavatable by a beam thereof of sufficient intensity and duration, (ii) a second one of the said coatings being insufficiently radiation-absorbing for the said electromagnetic radiation of a particular wavelength to be substantially resistant to excavation solely by absorbing radiation of a beam thereof of sufficient intensity and duration to excavate the said first one of the coatings, and (b) excavating, by a beam of the said electromagnetic radiation, at least one identifiable configuration in the said first coating, to form at least one excavated area therein having a sufficiently different reflectance or transmittance than the remainder of the said first coating to be distinguishable therefrom at a particular angle of incidence of light on the substrate.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
198 words
A method of manufacturing an optical interference authenticating device comprising: (a) depositing two coatings on a substrate, each of the said coatings comprising at least one optical interference layer, the materials of the layers being selected so that the two coatings together and separately have different, known spectral reflectance and spectral transmittance characteristics, at different angles of incidence of light thereon, (i) a first one of the said coatings being sufficiently radiation-absorbing for electromagnetic radiation of a particular wavelength to be excavatable by a beam thereof of sufficient intensity and duration, (ii) a second one of the said coatings being insufficiently radiation-absorbing for the said electromagnetic radiation of a particular wavelength to be substantially resistant to excavation solely by absorbing radiation of a beam thereof of sufficient intensity and duration to excavate the said first one of the coatings, and (b) excavating, by a beam of the said electromagnetic radiation, at least one identifiable configuration in the said first coating, to form at least one excavated area therein having a sufficiently different reflectance or transmittance than the remainder of the said first coating to be distinguishable therefrom at a particular angle of incidence of light on the substrate.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the said second coating is deposited on the substrate before the said first coating is deposited thereon, so that the said second coating remains substantially intact when the at least one portion of the said first coating is excavated by the said beam of electromagnetic energy.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the said first coating is deposited on the substrate before the said second coating is deposited thereon, so that the portions of both the said first and second coatings are excavated by the said beam of electromagnetic radiation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the said first coating is substantially transparent for a known spectral region.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the said second coating is substantially transparent for a known spectral region.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
72 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the optical interference device is for attachment to a substantially non-transparent article, and the substrate is of a material that is substantially transparent for the spectral regions of the known characteristics of the first and second coatings so that the substrate may form a protective, outer covering for the first and second coatings when the optical interference authenticating device is attached to the non-transparent article.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein at least one further coating comprises at least one further layer having different, known spectral reflectance characteristics and spectral transmittance characteristics to the remainder is deposited on the substrate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the said electromagnetic energy is infrared laser radiation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the substrate is a polyester film having a thickness no greater than of the order of 0.25 mils, and the infrared laser radiation has a wavelength at least of the order of 10.8 μm and is directed through the substrate to excavate the said at least one portion of the said first coating.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
41 words
A method according to claim 9, wherein the sum of the optical thicknesses of the said two coatings, including any other coatings having known spectral reflectance and transmittance characteristics that may be deposited on the substrate, does not exceed 2.2 μm.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 10, wherein the thickness of any coating does not exceed 0.4 μm.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2100840A
Cited
US3897964A
Cited
US3919447A
Cited
US4304809A
Cited
GB2093404A
Cited
US4519632A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-12-01 | 1990-06-02 | 1990-12-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-12-01 | 1994-06-02 | 1994-12-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-12-01 | 1998-06-02 | 1998-12-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |