Patent US4620284A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4620284A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Qualitative and quantitative analysis using Raman scattering
Assignee: Honeywell UOP LLC
•
Filing: 1983-12-29
•
Granted: 1986-10-28
•
Expires: 2003-12-29
Abstract
Abstract Methods and apparatus are provided for qualitative and quantitative analysis utilizing the Raman effect. Analyses are obtainable without exercise of human judgment or human interpretation. Analyses may be obtained on-line in the field or in a laboratory. A wide range of fluids and solids are capable of rapid routine analysis without major adjustment of equipment. An analysis is obtained by comparing a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample to Raman spectra of samples whose analysis is known. The known Raman spectra are stored in computing means in digital form and the comparison is accomplished by the computing means.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert P. Schnell
- 👤 Robert W. Sampson
- 👤 Ronald F. Pacanowski
- 👤 Donald J. Bruggema
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 03:58
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/62; G01N21/63; G01N21/65; G01N2021/651
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 36
Claim 1
Independent Claim
381 words
A method for determining the composition of an unknown sample comprising: (a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer; (e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose composition is known; and, (f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps: (i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each of said spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating steps (f)(i), (f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional spectral analysis regions, until only one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in said one chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown samples; (v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working hypotheses, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected spectral regions of the unknown spectrum; (vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to the unknown spectrum; (vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum; and, (viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded, repeating steps (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additonal spectral analysis regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been discarded, the unknown sample composition then being that of said one remaining working hypothesis.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
381 words
A method for determining the composition of an unknown sample comprising: (a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer; (e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose composition is known; and, (f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps: (i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each of said spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating steps (f)(i), (f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional spectral analysis regions, until only one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in said one chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown samples; (v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working hypotheses, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected spectral regions of the unknown spectrum; (vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to the unknown spectrum; (vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum; and, (viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded, repeating steps (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additonal spectral analysis regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been discarded, the unknown sample composition then being that of said one remaining working hypothesis.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 further characterized in that said size characteristic is the height of the highest peak of the spectral analysis region.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1 further characterized in that said size characteristic is the area of the spectral analysis region.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
99 words
The method of claim 1 further characterized with respect to step (f)(vi) in that said testing is accomplised by: (a) for each working hypothesis, establishing a set of equations consisting of one equation associated with each selected region of the unknown spectrum, which equation describes the area of the region in terms of concentrations of the reference samples and areas of reference spectra regions; and, (b) attempting to solve each set of equations and concluding that each working hypothesis whose set of equations cannot be completely solved or yields unreal numbers is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
99 words
The method of claim 4 further characterized in that said equation associated with each region is of the form X.sub.1 C.sub.1 +X.sub.2 C.sub.2 + . . . +X.sub.n C.sub.n =A, where C 1 , C 2 , . . . C n =the concentration of the substance of reference samples 1, 2, . . . n in the hypothetical combination of reference samples, X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n =the areas of those regions in each of the reference spectra of the hypothetical combination, and A=the area of the region of the unknown spectrum.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
226 words
A method for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected substances of an unknown sample comprising: (a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer; (e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each reference sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected substances; and, (f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps: (i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum; (iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference samples; and, (iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said unknown sample by applying the relationship established in step (f)(iii) to the unknown spectrum region areas.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
226 words
A method for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected substances of an unknown sample comprising: (a) producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) providing said unknown sample Raman spectrum to a computer; (e) providing to the computer reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each reference sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected substances; and, (f) identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said comparison being accomplished by utilizing the computer and comprising the following steps: (i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum; (iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference samples; and, (iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said unknown sample by applying the relationship established in step (f)(iii) to the unknown spectrum region areas.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
250 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized with respect to step (f) in that said relationship is established and said concentrations determined by: (a) selecting a number of spectral analysis regions equal to the number of said preselected substances; (b) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum and calculating area fractions for the reference spectra and for the unknown spectrum; (c) establishing a set of equations for each reference sample where the number of equations in each set is equal to the number of said preselected substances and each equation describes the concentration of one preselected substance in terms of its contributions to region areas, each equation having the form X=C.sub.1x A.sub.1 +C.sub.2x A.sub.2 + . . . +C.sub.nx A.sub.n, where X represents the concentration fraction of the preselected substance, A 1 , A 2 , . . . A n are area fractions of the selected regions of the spectrum of the reference sample where n equals the number of regions, and C 1x , C 2x , . . . C nx are coefficients associated with the contributions of the preselected substances to the regions; (d) solving all of the equations established in step (c) for said coefficients; (e) establishing one set of equations for the unknown sample as was done in step (c) for each reference sample; and, (f) solving said unknown sample equations for the concentrations of the preselected substances, using the coefficients determined in step (d).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
190 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized with respect to steps (f)(iii) and (f)(iv) in that said relationship is established and said concentrations determined by: (a) expressing said reference sample concentrations in terms of concentration fractions and arranging the concentration fractions in a concentration fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and said preselected substances; (b) calculating area fractions from said reference spectra region areas and arranging the area fractions into an area fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and the selected regions; (c) determining a transpose matrix, which is the transpose of the area fraction matrix; (d) forming a mathematical quantity using said matrices, as follows: ##EQU4## (e) solving said mathematical quantity to yield a matrix, which consists of correlation coefficients, arranged according to the selected regions and said preselected substances; (f) calculating area fractions from said unknown spectrum region areas and arranging the area fractions in a matrix; and, (g) multiplying said correlation coefficient matrix by the matrix formed of said unknown spectrum area fractions to obtain a product which is a concentration fraction matrix which expresses the concentrations of the preselected substances in said unknown sample.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that the substances comprising said unknown sample are paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that said beam of photons is from a laser source.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that the wave lengths of said beam of photons are closely centered about a value of 6328 angstroms.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that photons are removed from said stream of photons before it is resolved to form a spectrum, the removed portion consisting of photons at the same frequency as said beam of photons and at a higher frequency than the frequency of said beam of photons.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that composite reference spectra are used in performing said comparison, a composite reference spectrum being prepared for each reference sample by providing a plurality of spectra of each reference sample to the computer and averaging each of said plurality of reference spectra.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that a portion of said Raman spectrum is removed and not provided to the computer, such portion consisting of Rayleigh scattered light and the anti-Stokes lines.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized in that said unknown spectrum and said reference spectra are adjusted to substantially remove false information before said comparison is accomplished.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 15 further characterized in that said false information comprises a background spectrum, which is obtained in the same general manner as a sample spectrum but with said beam of photons interrupted, and said adjustment to remove false information is accomplished by subtracting the background spectrum intensity from the sample spectrum intensity at each frequency.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 15 further characterized in that said false information comprises sample fluorescence and stray photons and said adjustment to remove false information is accomplished by means of establishing baselines and discarding that portion of the spectrum which is below the baselines.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
394 words
Apparatus for determining the composition of an unknown sample comprising: (a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means; (e) said computing means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose composition is known; and, (f) means within the computing means for identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said computing means accomplishing said comparison by performing the following functions: (i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each spectral analysis region of the unknown spectrum; (iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating functions (f)(i), (f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional regions, until only one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in said one chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown sample; (v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working hypothesis, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected regions of the unknown spectrum; (vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to the unknown spectrum; (vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum; and, (viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded, repeating functions (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additional regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been discarded, the unknown sample composition then being that of said one remaining working hypothesis.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
394 words
Apparatus for determining the composition of an unknown sample comprising: (a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means; (e) said computing means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose composition is known; and, (f) means within the computing means for identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said computing means accomplishing said comparison by performing the following functions: (i) inspecting the unknown spectrum and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining a size characteristic associated with each spectral analysis region of the unknown spectrum; (iii) searching the reference spectra and choosing those reference spectra having in the selected spectral analysis regions features corresponding to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum and size characteristics substantially identical to those of the selected spectral analysis regions of the unknown spectrum; (iv) if more than one reference spectrum is chosen, repeating functions (f)(i), (f)(ii), and (f)(iii), selecting additional regions, until only one reference spectrum is chosen, the substances present in said one chosen reference spectrum being present in the unknown sample; (v) if no reference spectrum is chosen, establishing a number of working hypothesis, each hypothesis being that the unknown sample consists of a different combination of the reference samples which exhibited the spectra chosen to have features corresponding to those of the selected regions of the unknown spectrum; (vi) testing each working hypothesis by combining the spectra of the hypothesis to produce a single hypothetical spectrum and comparing it to the unknown spectrum; (vii) discarding each working hypothesis which is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum; and, (viii) if more than one working hypothesis has not been discarded, repeating functions (f)(v) through (f)(viii), selecting additional regions, until only one working hypothesis has not been discarded, the unknown sample composition then being that of said one remaining working hypothesis.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
99 words
The apparatus of claim 18 further characterized with respect to function (f)(vi) in that said testing is accomplished by: (a) for each working hypothesis, establishing a set of equations consisting of one equation associated with each selected region of the unknown spectrum, which equation describes the area of the region in terms of concentrations of the reference samples and areas of reference spectra regions; and (b) attempting to solve each set of equations and concluding that each working hypothesis whose set of equations cannot be completely solved or yields unreal numbers is not substantially identical to the unknown spectrum.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
99 words
The apparatus of claim 19 further characterized in that said equation associated with each region is of the form X.sub.1 C.sub.1 +X.sub.2 C.sub.2 + . . . +X.sub.n C.sub.n =A, Where C 1 , C 2 , . . . C n =the concentration of the substance of reference samples 1, 2, . . . n in the hypothetical combination of reference samples, X 1 , X 2 , . . . X n =the areas of those regions in each of the reference spectra of the hypothetical combination, and A=the area of the region of the unknown spectrum.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
244 words
Apparatus for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected substances of an unknown sample comprising: (a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means; (e) said computer means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each reference sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected substances; and, (f) means within the computer for identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said computer accomplishing said comparison by performing the following functions: (i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum; (iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference sample; and (iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said unknown sample by applying the relationship established in function (f)(iii) to the unknown spectrum region areas.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
244 words
Apparatus for performing a quantitative analysis for preselected substances of an unknown sample comprising: (a) means for producing a beam of photons which is substantially monochromatic and impinges on the unknown sample; (b) means for collecting photons scattered by the unknown sample into a stream of scattered photons; (c) means for resolving the photon stream into its component frequencies to form a Raman spectrum of the unknown sample; (d) means for converting said unknown sample Raman spectrum to digital form and transmitting said unknown spectrum to computing means; (e) said computer means, which contain reference spectra obtained in the same manner as said unknown spectrum, where the reference spectra are of reference samples whose quantitative composition is known and where each reference sample is comprised of at least one of said preselected substances; and, (f) means within the computer for identifying substances present in the unknown sample by comparing said unknown spectrum to the reference spectra, said computer accomplishing said comparison by performing the following functions: (i) inspecting the reference spectra and selecting a plurality of separate spectral analysis regions; (ii) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum; (iii) establishing a relationship between said reference spectra region areas and concentrations of said preselected substances in said reference sample; and (iv) determining the concentrations of said preselected substances in said unknown sample by applying the relationship established in function (f)(iii) to the unknown spectrum region areas.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
244 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized with respect to element (f) in that said relationship is established and said concentrations determined by the following functions: (a) selecting a number of spectral analysis regions equal to the number of said preselected substances; (b) determining the areas of the selected regions for each reference spectrum and for the unknown spectrum and calculating area fractions; (c) establishing a set of equations for each reference sample where the number of equations in each set is equal to the number of said preselected substances and each equation describes the concentration of one preselected substance in terms of its contributions to region areas, each equation having the form X=C.sub.1x A.sub.1 +C.sub.2x A.sub.2 + . . . +C.sub.nx A.sub.n, where X represents the concentration fractions of the preselected substance, A 1 , A 2 , . . . A n are area fractions of the selected regions of the spectrum of the reference sample where n equals the number of regions, and C 1x , C 2x , . . . C nx are coefficients associated with the contributions of the preselected substances to the regions; (d) solving all of the equations established in function (c) for said coefficients: (e) establishing one set of equations for the unknown sample as was done in function (c) for each reference sample; and, (f) solving said unknown sample equations for the concentrations of the preselected substances, using the coefficients determined in function (d).
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
190 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized with respect to functions (f)(iii) and (f)(iv) in that said relationship is established and said concentrations determined by: (a) expressing said reference sample concentrations in terms of concentration fractions and arranging the concentration fractions in a concentration fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and said preselected substances; (b) calculating area fractions from said reference spectra region areas and arranging the area fractions into an area fraction matrix, according to said reference samples and the selected regions; (c) determining a transpose matrix, which is the transpose of the area fraction matrix; (d) forming a mathematical relationship using said matrices, as follows: ##EQU5## (e) solving said mathematical quantity to yield a matrix, which consists of correlation coefficients, arranged according to the selected regions and said preselected substances; (f) calculating area fractions from said unknown spectrum region areas and arranging the area fractions in a matrix; and, (g) multiplying said correlation coefficients matrix by the matrix formed of said unknown spectrum area fractions to obtain a product which is a concentration fraction matrix which expresses the concentrations of the preselected substances in said unknown sample.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
20 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that the substances comprising said unknown sample are paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
18 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that said beam of photons is from a laser source.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
26 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further characterized in that the wave lengths of said beam of photons are closely centered about a value of 6328 angstroms.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
52 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for removing photons from said stream of photons before it is resolved to form a spectrum, the removed portion consisting of photons at the same frequency as said beam of photons and at a higher frequency than the frequency of said beam of photons.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
50 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for using composite reference spectra in performing said comparison, a composite reference spectrum being prepared for each reference sample by providing a plurality of spectra of each reference sample to said computer means and averaging each of said plurality of reference spectra.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for removing a portion of said Raman spectrum, such portion consisting of Rayleigh scattered light and the anti-Stokes lines.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising means for adjusting said unknown spectrum and said reference spectra to substantially remove false information before said comparison is accomplished.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
78 words
The apparatus of claim 30 further characterized in that said spectrum adjusting means comprises means for providing to said computer means a background spectrum for use in accomplishing said adjustment to remove false information, said background spectrum being obtained in the same general manner as a sample spectrum but with said beam of photons interrupted, and said adjustment to remove false information being accomplished by subtracting the background spectrum intensity from the sample spectrum intensity at each frequency.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
40 words
The apparatus of claim 30 further comprising means for substantially removing those portions of the spectra which comprise sample fluorescence and stray photons by means of establishing baselines and discarding that portion of the spectrum which is below the baselines.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2527121A
Cited
US2527122A
Cited
US2940355A
Cited
US3414354A
Cited
US3556659A
Cited
US3625613A
Cited
US3723007A
Cited
US3820897A
Cited
US4030827A
Cited
US4068953A
Cited
US4195930A
Cited
US4127329A
Cited
US4267572A
Cited
US4270864A
Cited
US4397556A
Cited
US4365303A
Cited
US4505586A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-10-27 | 1990-04-28 | 1990-10-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-10-27 | 1994-04-28 | 1994-10-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-10-27 | 1998-04-28 | 1998-10-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |