← Back to Patent Explorer
US4596769A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Monoclonal antibodies to peptidoglycan and methods of preparing same

Assignee: Temple University
•
Filing: 1984-03-05
•
Granted: 1986-06-24
•
Expires: 2004-03-05
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Several novel hybridoma cell lines, ATCC #HB-8510, 8511, 8512, 8513, 8514, 8515, 8516, and 8517 produce monoclonal antibody to an antigen, peptidoglycan, which is a normal structural component of ne REFERENCE TO GOVERNMENT The invention described herein was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DE-03487 and DE-05160.

Inventors

  • 👤 Gerald D. Shockman
  • 👤 Dianne E. Jackson
  • 👤 William Wong

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 16:03
CPC Classifications
C; C07; C07K; C07K16/00; C07K16/12; A; A61; A61K; A61K38/00; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S435/00; Y10S435/961; Y10S436/00; Y10S436/804; Y10S436/815; Y10S436/825; Y10S530/00; Y10S530/806; Y10S530/863; Y10S530/864

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 40
Claim 1
Independent Claim 18 words
A monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 18 words
A monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 37 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 1 produced by a hybridoma formed by fusion of cells from a myeloma line with spleen cells from a donor previously immunized with cell wall material from a species of Eubacteria.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 17 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 1 which binds to peptidoglycan from substantially any species of Eubacteria.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
A monoclonal antibody acording to claim 1 which is selected from the group consisting of the following subclasses: IgM, IgG 1 , and IgG 3 .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 2 wherein the myeloma line and spleen cells are murine.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 36 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 5 wherein the hybridoma is formed by fusion of SP2/0-Ag14 myeloma cells with spleen cells from a BALB/c mouse previously immunized by cell wall material from a species of Eubacteria.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 128 words
Monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan from two or more species of Eubacteria, produced by the method comprising the steps of: (a) immunizing a donor with a species of Eubacteria or fractions thereof containing cell wall material; (b) removing the spleens from said donor and making a suspension of said spleen cells; (c) fusing said spleen cells with donor myeloma cells; (d) diluting and culturing the fused cells in separate wells in a medium which will not support the unfused myeloma cells; (e) assaying the supernate in each well containing a hydridoma for the presence of antibody to peptidoglycan; (f) selecting and cloning a hybridoma producing antibody which reacts with peptidoglycan from two or more species of Eubacteria.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 128 words
Monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan from two or more species of Eubacteria, produced by the method comprising the steps of: (a) immunizing a donor with a species of Eubacteria or fractions thereof containing cell wall material; (b) removing the spleens from said donor and making a suspension of said spleen cells; (c) fusing said spleen cells with donor myeloma cells; (d) diluting and culturing the fused cells in separate wells in a medium which will not support the unfused myeloma cells; (e) assaying the supernate in each well containing a hydridoma for the presence of antibody to peptidoglycan; (f) selecting and cloning a hybridoma producing antibody which reacts with peptidoglycan from two or more species of Eubacteria.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 16 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 7 wherein the donor and the myeloma cells are murine.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 38 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 8 wherein the method comprises the further steps of transferring said clones into mice and harvesting the malignant ascites or serum from said mice, said ascites or serum containing the desired antibody.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 32 words
A monoclonal antibody according to claim 8 wherein the method comprises the further steps of culturing the hybridoma in a suitable medium and recovering the antibody from the supernatant above said hybridoma.
Claim 13
Independent Claim 46 words
A method for producing a monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan comprising culturing a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of eight hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 and recovering the secreted monoclonal antibodies from the culture medium.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 46 words
A method for producing a monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan comprising culturing a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of eight hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 and recovering the secreted monoclonal antibodies from the culture medium.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 11 words
A monoclonal antibody prepared according to the method of claim 11.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 52 words
A method for producing a monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan comprising injecting into a mouse a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of eight hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 and recovering the secreted monoclonal antibodies from the mouse ascitic fluid or serum.
Claim 17
Independent Claim 52 words
A method for producing a monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of peptidoglycan comprising injecting into a mouse a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of eight hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 and recovering the secreted monoclonal antibodies from the mouse ascitic fluid or serum.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 11 words
A monoclonal antibody prepared according to the method of claim 13.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 52 words
A composition comprising a continuous cell line which produces monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan comprising a cell hybrid formed from a mouse spleen cell previously immunized with peptidoglycan fused to a mouse myeloma, and a culture medium for said hybrid.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 52 words
A composition comprising a continuous cell line which produces monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan comprising a cell hybrid formed from a mouse spleen cell previously immunized with peptidoglycan fused to a mouse myeloma, and a culture medium for said hybrid.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 16 words
A composition according to claim 15 wherein the antibody binds to substantially any species of Eubacteria.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 16 words
The composition according to claim 15 wherein the mouse spleen cell is from a BALB/c mouse.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 12 words
The composition according to claim 15 wherein the mouse myeloma is SP2/0-Ag14.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 26 words
A composition comprising a continuous cell line producing monoclonal antibody selected from the group of eight cell lines numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 26 words
A composition comprising a continuous cell line producing monoclonal antibody selected from the group of eight cell lines numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 43 words
A diagnostic method for detecting the presence of Eubacteria, comprising contacting a specimen with monoclonal antibodies of class IgG or IgM which specifically bind to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan, and detecting the material bound by said antibodies by immunological assay means.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 43 words
A diagnostic method for detecting the presence of Eubacteria, comprising contacting a specimen with monoclonal antibodies of class IgG or IgM which specifically bind to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan, and detecting the material bound by said antibodies by immunological assay means.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 23 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 20 wherein the monoclonal antibody binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan from substantially any eubacterium.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 14 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 20 wherein the specimen is fluid or tissue.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 30 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 20 wherein the immunological assay means is selected from the group consisting of radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, fluorescent assay, precipitation, agglutination, and antigen capture.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 19 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 20 additionally comprising the preliminary step of treating the specimen to unmask peptidoglycan.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 22 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 24 wherein the preliminary step of treating the specimen to unmask peptidoglycan comprises treatment with acid.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 21 words
A diagnostic method according to claim 24 wherein the preliminary step of treating the specimen to unmask peptidoglycan comprises enzymatic hydrolysis.
Claim 34
Independent Claim 46 words
A method for removing peptidoglycan-containing materials from fluids comprising passing a fluid over monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan, said antibody being linked to an insoluble matrix, and binding said materials to said matrix-linked peptidoglycan.
Claim 35
Independent Claim 46 words
A method for removing peptidoglycan-containing materials from fluids comprising passing a fluid over monoclonal antibody of class IgG or IgM which specifically binds to an antigenic determinant of eubacterial peptidoglycan, said antibody being linked to an insoluble matrix, and binding said materials to said matrix-linked peptidoglycan.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method according to claim 27 wherein the peptidoglycan-containing material comprises intact bacterial cells.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method according to claim 27 wherein the peptidoglycan-containing material comprises peptidoglycan-containing cell fragments.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 13 words
A method according to claim 27 wherein the peptidoglycan-containing material comprises free peptidoglycan.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 65 words
A diagnostic method for detecting the presence of Eubacteria, comprising contacting a specimen with monoclonal antibody produced by a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 under conditions such that an immune-complex between said monoclonal antibody and any eubacterial peptidoglycan in said specimen is formed and detecting said immune complex as indicating the presence of Eubacteria.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 65 words
A diagnostic method for detecting the presence of Eubacteria, comprising contacting a specimen with monoclonal antibody produced by a hybridoma selected from the group consisting of hybridomas numbered consecutively from ATCC #HB-8510 through ATCC #HB-8517 under conditions such that an immune-complex between said monoclonal antibody and any eubacterial peptidoglycan in said specimen is formed and detecting said immune complex as indicating the presence of Eubacteria.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4350683A Cited
US4381292A Cited
US4487829A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1989-06-23 1989-12-23 1990-06-24 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1993-06-23 1993-12-23 1994-06-24 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1997-06-23 1997-12-23 1998-06-24 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag