Patent US4584165A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4584165A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Redundant reactivity control system
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1983-02-09
•
Granted: 1986-04-22
•
Expires: 2003-02-09
Abstract
Abstract A redundant reactivity control system, operating in conjunction with other systems in a nuclear power plant, to mitigate the potential consequences of an anticipated transient without scram event, is described. The invention interfaces to a boiling water nuclear reactor with the reactor's neutron monitoring system, standby liquid control system, control rod drive system, reactor recirculation system, reactor water clean-up feed water control system, and control room and local panels. Two divisionally separated control panels include associated detection and actuation logic and the necessary interface logic to other systems to perform the specific functions in response to an anticipated transient without scram event. Each separate division includes two identical channels. Actuation of any associated reactor system by the invention requires the agreement of the two channels within a division. A one channel indication actuates appropriate annunciators and alarm equipment to notify plant personnel of a possible system fault. Each divisional panel receives independent analog signals from high dome pressure transmitters, reactor low water level transmitters, and average power range monitor down-scale trip units. These inputs are combined and processed by solid state logic circuits to produce output actuation signals for interfacing systems. The present invention actuates a stand-by liquid control system to inject sodium pentaborate into a reactor core if an anticipated transient without scram event is sensed. Such insertion is made only after all other means of mitigation have not been able to reduce radioactivity, i.e. control rod insertion, recirculation pump trip, etc. The present invention provides a high degree of reliability and adds further levels of nuclear plant safety, while avoiding the possiblity of inadvertent stand-by liquid control actuation.
Inventors
- 👤 Patricia A. Wilson
- 👤 Kenneth B. Stackhouse
- 👤 Sujit Chakraborty
- 👤 Walter S. Ching
- 👤 William D. Hill
- 👤 John B. Knepp
- 👤 James P. Ward
- 👤 Warren L. Zediker
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 13:01
CPC Classifications
G; G21; G21C; G21C7/00; G21C7/36; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 33
Claim 1
Independent Claim
115 words
A reactivity control system for a nuclear reactor, comprising: sensors for monitoring critical reactor operating parameters and for sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; means for monitoring average reactor power range; a timer, defining a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; means for actuating reactor safety systems in response to a sensed ATWS event; and means for indicating needed operation of a reactor standby safety system at the end of said timer reactor interval when said monitored average power range has not settled within said selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
115 words
A reactivity control system for a nuclear reactor, comprising: sensors for monitoring critical reactor operating parameters and for sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; means for monitoring average reactor power range; a timer, defining a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; means for actuating reactor safety systems in response to a sensed ATWS event; and means for indicating needed operation of a reactor standby safety system at the end of said timer reactor interval when said monitored average power range has not settled within said selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, and wherein said standby safety system means for operating an alternate reactor rod insertion system in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1 and wherein said standby system comprises means for tripping a reactor water recirculating pump system in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, and wherein said standby safety system comprises means for tripping a reactor water recirculating low frequency motor generator in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, and wherein said standby safety system comprises means for limiting reactor feedwater flow in response to an ATWS event.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
19 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, said sensors further comprising means for monitoring a reactor high-dome pressure condition.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
18 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, said sensors further comprising means for monitoring a reactor low-water condition.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, said sensors further comprising means for monitoring a manual reactivity control system actuation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
35 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1, having two identical control system divisions, each division comprising two separate, identical reactivity control system channels wherein an actuating ATWS is reported when simultaneously sensed by both channels.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
179 words
A reactivity control system for nuclear reactors, comprising: two separate, identical reactivity control system divisions, each division comprising two separate, identical reactivity control system channels, each of said channels including: (a) sensors for monitoring critical reactor operating parameters and for sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; (b) means for monitoring average reactor power range; and (c) a timer, defining a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; each division including: (a) means for actuating reactor safety systems in response to an ATWS event that is simultaneously sensed by both channels within a division; and (b) means for indicating needed operation of a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said timer reactor interval when said monitored average power range is not settled within said selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems; and means for reporting a reactivity control system failure when an ATWS event is sensed by only one of two channels within a division.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
179 words
A reactivity control system for nuclear reactors, comprising: two separate, identical reactivity control system divisions, each division comprising two separate, identical reactivity control system channels, each of said channels including: (a) sensors for monitoring critical reactor operating parameters and for sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; (b) means for monitoring average reactor power range; and (c) a timer, defining a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; each division including: (a) means for actuating reactor safety systems in response to an ATWS event that is simultaneously sensed by both channels within a division; and (b) means for indicating needed operation of a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said timer reactor interval when said monitored average power range is not settled within said selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems; and means for reporting a reactivity control system failure when an ATWS event is sensed by only one of two channels within a division.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
238 words
In a boiling water nuclear reactor, a reactivity control system, comprising: sensors for monitoring a reactor high-dome pressure condition, a reactor low water condition, and a manual reactivity control system actuation, said conditions and actuation being singly, and in combination, indicative of a detected anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; means for operating an alternate reactor rod insertion system in response to a detected ATWS event; means for tripping a reactor water recirculating pump system in response to a sensed reactor high dome pressure condition; means for tripping said reactor water recirculating pump system in response to a sensed reactor low water level condition; means for tripping a reactor water recirculating low frequency motor generator (LFMG) in response to a sensed reactor low water condition; means for continuously monitoring average reactor power range; a first timer, defining a first reactor response interval during which a monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; means for limiting reactor feed-water flow in response to a first timer time-out; means for tripping said reactor water recirculating LFMG in response to a first timer time-out; a second timer, defining a second reactor response interval of greater duration than said first reactor response interval during which said monitored average power range must settle within said selected safe reactor operation limit; and means for operating a reactor standby liquid control system (SLCS) in response to a second timer time-out.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
238 words
In a boiling water nuclear reactor, a reactivity control system, comprising: sensors for monitoring a reactor high-dome pressure condition, a reactor low water condition, and a manual reactivity control system actuation, said conditions and actuation being singly, and in combination, indicative of a detected anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; means for operating an alternate reactor rod insertion system in response to a detected ATWS event; means for tripping a reactor water recirculating pump system in response to a sensed reactor high dome pressure condition; means for tripping said reactor water recirculating pump system in response to a sensed reactor low water level condition; means for tripping a reactor water recirculating low frequency motor generator (LFMG) in response to a sensed reactor low water condition; means for continuously monitoring average reactor power range; a first timer, defining a first reactor response interval during which a monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; means for limiting reactor feed-water flow in response to a first timer time-out; means for tripping said reactor water recirculating LFMG in response to a first timer time-out; a second timer, defining a second reactor response interval of greater duration than said first reactor response interval during which said monitored average power range must settle within said selected safe reactor operation limit; and means for operating a reactor standby liquid control system (SLCS) in response to a second timer time-out.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
16 words
The reactivity control system of claim 11, further comprising override means for manually operating said SLCS.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
The reactivity control system of claim 12, further comprising means for manually resetting said alternate control rod insertion system.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
42 words
The reactivity control system of claim 13, further comprising: a third timer, defining a third reactor response interval and for resetting said alternate control rod insertion system at the end of said interval in the absence of a sensed continued ATWS event.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
38 words
The reactivity control system of claim 14, further comprising: a fourth timer, defining a reactor response interval, said timer resetting said reactivity control system at the end of said interval in the absence of a continued ATWS event.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
38 words
The reactivity control system of claim 15, further comprising: means for monitoring the level of liquid in a SLCS storage tank and for interrupting SLCS operation in the absence of a selected liquid level within the said tank.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
24 words
The reactivity control system of claim 16, further comprising: means for terminating operation of a reactor water cleanup system during operation of said SLCS.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
98 words
A method for controlling nuclear reactor reactivity, comprising: monitoring critical reactor operating parameters; sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; monitoring average reactor power range; timing a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; actuating reactor safety systems in response to a sensed ATWS event; and operating a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said interval when said monitored average power range does not settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
98 words
A method for controlling nuclear reactor reactivity, comprising: monitoring critical reactor operating parameters; sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; monitoring average reactor power range; timing a reactor interval during which monitored average power range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; actuating reactor safety systems in response to a sensed ATWS event; and operating a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said interval when said monitored average power range does not settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising operating an alternate reactor rod insertion system in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising tripping a reactor water recirculating pump system in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising tripping a water recirculating low-frequency motor generator in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising limiting reactor feed-water flow in response to an indicated ATWS event.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 18, said monitored critical reactor operating parameters comprising reactor high-dome pressure.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 18, said monitored critical reactor operating parameters comprising reactor low-water.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising monitoring a manual reactivity control system actuation.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 18, further comprising: providing two identical reactivity control system divisions, each division comprising two separate, identical reactivity control system channels; and reporting an actuating ATWS event when said event is simultaneously sensed by both channels.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
158 words
A method for controlling nuclear reactor reactivity, comprising: providing two separate, identical reactivity control system divisions, each division comprising two separate identical reactivity control system channels, each of said channels operating according to the following method: (a) monitoring critical reactor operating parameters; (b) sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; (c) monitoring average reactor power range; and (d) timing reactor interval during which monitored average range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; actuating reactor safety systems in response to an ATWS event simultaneously sensed by both channels within a division; operating a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said interval when said monitored average power range does not settle within the selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems; and reporting a reactivity control system failure when an ATWS event is sensed by only one of said two channels of a division.
Claim 32
Independent Claim
158 words
A method for controlling nuclear reactor reactivity, comprising: providing two separate, identical reactivity control system divisions, each division comprising two separate identical reactivity control system channels, each of said channels operating according to the following method: (a) monitoring critical reactor operating parameters; (b) sensing conditions indicative of an anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) event; (c) monitoring average reactor power range; and (d) timing reactor interval during which monitored average range must settle within a selected safe reactor operation limit; actuating reactor safety systems in response to an ATWS event simultaneously sensed by both channels within a division; operating a reactor standby liquid control system at the end of said interval when said monitored average power range does not settle within the selected safe reactor operation limit in response to actuation of said reactor safety systems; and reporting a reactivity control system failure when an ATWS event is sensed by only one of said two channels of a division.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
20 words
The reactivity control system of claim 1 and including means for indicating needed operation of said reactor standby safety system.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-04-21 | 1989-10-21 | 1990-04-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-04-21 | 1993-10-21 | 1994-04-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-04-21 | 1997-10-21 | 1998-04-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |