Patent US4581937A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4581937A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of suppressing unwanted indications in automated ultrasonic testing
Assignee: KTV SYSTEMTECHNIK GmbH
•
Filing: 1984-09-17
•
Granted: 1986-04-15
•
Expires: 2004-09-17
Abstract
Abstract The invention relates to a method of suppressing unwanted indications in automated ultrasonic testing of a test piece. In order to improve the suppression of unwanted indications, in particular in the case of extended statistical suppression, a variable discriminator threshold (3) is derived from the highest of all maximum amplitudes (2) by means of a predetermined amplitude difference (4), wherein the ultrasonic signals are not evaluated as flaw signals when only said variable discriminator threshold (3) is exceeded but are evaluated as flaw signals only when additionally at least the highest of all maximum amplitudes (2) exceeds the fixed discriminator threshold (1) preset for the testing operation.
Inventors
- 👤 Raimund Lang
- 👤 Dieter Lather
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-10 01:55
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N29/00; G01N29/04; G01N29/11; G01N29/22; G01N29/32; G01N29/36; G01N29/40; G01N29/44; G01N29/48; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/52; G01S7/52017; G01S7/52023; G01S7/52025; G01S7/52026; G01N2291/00; G01N2291/04; G01N2291/044
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 5
Claim 1
Independent Claim
193 words
A method of suppressing unwanted indications in automated utlrasonic testing in which a test piece and an associated ultrasonic scanning head are moved relative to one another at a predetermined speed, the peak amplitude values of the ultrasonic signals reflected from the interior of the test piece are detected and a statistical interference suppression analysis is performed on the detected signals, comprising the steps of (a) determining a maximum peak amplitude value for the detected signals during a predetermined test interval, (b) establishing for the test interval a variable threshold value which is less than the maximum peak amplitude value by a preselected amount, (c) establishing a fixed threshold value independent of any peak amplitude value and representative of a flaw to be detected, (d) comparing successive peak amplitude values of the detected signals to the variable and fixed thresholds, (e) counting the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold, and (f) generating a flaw signal only when the maximum peak amplitude value exceeds the fixed threshold value and the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold value are greater than or equal to a preselected number.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
193 words
A method of suppressing unwanted indications in automated utlrasonic testing in which a test piece and an associated ultrasonic scanning head are moved relative to one another at a predetermined speed, the peak amplitude values of the ultrasonic signals reflected from the interior of the test piece are detected and a statistical interference suppression analysis is performed on the detected signals, comprising the steps of (a) determining a maximum peak amplitude value for the detected signals during a predetermined test interval, (b) establishing for the test interval a variable threshold value which is less than the maximum peak amplitude value by a preselected amount, (c) establishing a fixed threshold value independent of any peak amplitude value and representative of a flaw to be detected, (d) comparing successive peak amplitude values of the detected signals to the variable and fixed thresholds, (e) counting the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold, and (f) generating a flaw signal only when the maximum peak amplitude value exceeds the fixed threshold value and the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold value are greater than or equal to a preselected number.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of counting the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold value is performed only when the maximum peak amplitude value exceeds the fixed threshold value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of storing in a memory peak amplitude values of detected signals which exceed the fixed threshold value while counting the number of peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold value and generating a flaw signal when the number of successive peak amplitude values which exceed the variable threshold value is greater than or equal to a preselected number.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method according to claim 3, including the step of erasing the peak amplitude values which exceed the fixed threshold value from memory after a preselected time if the number of successive detected signals which exceed the variable threshold is less than the preselected number.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-04-14 | 1989-10-14 | 1990-04-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-04-14 | 1993-10-14 | 1994-04-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-04-14 | 1997-10-14 | 1998-04-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |