Patent US4581581A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4581581A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of projection reconstruction imaging with reduced sensitivity to motion-related artifacts
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1983-06-30
•
Granted: 1986-04-08
•
Expires: 2003-06-30
Abstract
Abstract A method is provided for imaging a transverse slice of an object with reduced sensitivity to image artifacts due to object motion during the scan. The method utilizes projection measurements corresponding to at least 180° scan of the slice. The measurements are taken sequentially for views that are adjacent in angle such that measurements which are at the extremes of the scan angle are nevertheless measured at points close in time, reducing inconsistencies therebetween. The method is applicable to a number of modalities utilizing parallel-ray and fan-beam geometries, such as NMR and ultrasound, respectively.
Inventors
- 👤 Norbert J. Pelc
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 23:08
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B8/00; A61B8/13; A61B8/15; G; G01; G01N; G01N24/00; G01N24/08; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/28; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/54; G01S; G01S15/00; G01S15/88; G01S15/89; G01S15/8906; G01R33/56; G01R33/565; G01R33/56509
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
121 words
In a method of imaging a slice of an object undergoing examination, which method utilizes a scan composed of a plurality of projections, each of said projections measured at a predetermined point in time and at a predetermined projection angle relative to a reference direction within said slice, wherein the minimum and maximum projection angle values differ by at least 180°, the improvement wherein projections measured in following ones of a plurality of successive time segments, each of said time segments being a time interval during which at least two projections are measured and being short compared to the total scan time, include the measurement of projections at the minimum and the maximum projection angle values for projections not yet measured.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
121 words
In a method of imaging a slice of an object undergoing examination, which method utilizes a scan composed of a plurality of projections, each of said projections measured at a predetermined point in time and at a predetermined projection angle relative to a reference direction within said slice, wherein the minimum and maximum projection angle values differ by at least 180°, the improvement wherein projections measured in following ones of a plurality of successive time segments, each of said time segments being a time interval during which at least two projections are measured and being short compared to the total scan time, include the measurement of projections at the minimum and the maximum projection angle values for projections not yet measured.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said method comprises measuring parallel-ray projections.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the direction of each projection measurement within said imaging slice is determined by the direction of a magnetic-field gradient.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said imaging slice is positioned in a static homogeneous magnetic field and includes the steps of: selectively exiting a plurality of nuclear spins situated in said imaging slice such that said nuclear spins produce an NMR signal; and observing said NMR signal in the presence of said magnetic-field gradient wherein isochromats perpendicular to the gradient direction represent projections of points along the isochromats onto said gradient.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said method comprises measuring fan-beam projections.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 5 wherein said fan beam comprises a beam of ultrasonic energy.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said projection measurements comprise measuring the intensity o the ultrasonic energy not absorbed or scattered within said imaging slice along a plurality of ray paths within said fan beam.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said projection measrements comprise measuring the propagation velocity of said ultrasonic beam along a plurality of ray paths within said fan beam.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 6 wherein projection measurements are made to corespond to at least a 360° scan of the object.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
78 words
The method of claim 6 wherein sid step of measuring a projection comprises the steps of: positioning said object in an annular array of ultrasonic transducers each capable of transmitting and receiving ultrasonic energy; irradiating said imaging slice with a substantially coplanar beam of ultrasonic energy produced by one of said transducers; and detecting the ultrasonic energy not attenuated or scattered within said slice at a plurality of transducers situated within an angle subtended by said fan beam.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
180 words
In a method of imaging a slice of an object undergoing examination, which method utilizes a scan composed of a plurality of projections, each of said projections measured at a predetermined point in time and at a predetermined projection angle relative to a reference direction within said slice, wherein the minimum and maximum projection angle values differ by at least 180°, the improvement wherein a first one of said plurality of projections is measured at a first predetermined projection angle and wherein a second one of said plurality of projections is measured at a second predetermined projection angle and wherein predetermined ones of the remaining ones of said plurality of projections are measured in each of a plurality of successive time segments, each of said time segments being a time interval during which at least two projections are measured and being short compared to the total scan time, such that projections measured in a preceding one of said plurality of successive time segments include measurement of projections at the minimum and maximum projection angle values for the projection already measured.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
180 words
In a method of imaging a slice of an object undergoing examination, which method utilizes a scan composed of a plurality of projections, each of said projections measured at a predetermined point in time and at a predetermined projection angle relative to a reference direction within said slice, wherein the minimum and maximum projection angle values differ by at least 180°, the improvement wherein a first one of said plurality of projections is measured at a first predetermined projection angle and wherein a second one of said plurality of projections is measured at a second predetermined projection angle and wherein predetermined ones of the remaining ones of said plurality of projections are measured in each of a plurality of successive time segments, each of said time segments being a time interval during which at least two projections are measured and being short compared to the total scan time, such that projections measured in a preceding one of said plurality of successive time segments include measurement of projections at the minimum and maximum projection angle values for the projection already measured.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said first predetermined projection angle is approximately equal to the average of the values of said minimum and maximum projection angles.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said second predetermined projection angle is angularly adjacent to said first projection angle.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said method comprises measuring parallel-ray projections.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 14 wherein the direction of each projection measurement within said imaging slice is determined by the direction of a magnetic-field gradient.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 15 wherein said imaging slice is positioned in a static homogeneous magnetic field and includes the steps of: selectively exciting a plurality of nuclear spins situated in said imaging slice such that said nuclear spins produce an NMR signal; and observing said NMR signal in the presence of said magnetic-field gradient wherein isochromats perpendicular to the gradient direction represent projections of points along the isochromats onto said gradient.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said method comprises measuring fan-beam projections.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 17 wherein said fan beam comprises a beam of ultrasonic energy.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said projection measurements comprise measuring the intensity of the ultrasonic energy not absorbed or scattered within said imaging slice along a plurality of ray paths within said fan beam.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said projection measurements comprise measuring the propagation velocity of said ultrasonic beam along a plurality of ray within said fan beam.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 18 wherein projection measurements are made to correspond to at least 360° scan of the object.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
78 words
The method of claim 18 wherein said step of measuring a projection comprises the steps of: positioning said object in an annular array of ultrasonic transducers each capable of transmitting and receiving ultrasonic energy; irradiating said imaging slice with a substantially coplanar beam of ultrasonic energy produced by one of said transducers; and detecting the utlrasonic energy not attenuated or scattered within said slice at a plurality of transducers situated within an angle subtended by said fan beam.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1989-04-07 | 1989-10-07 | 1990-04-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1993-04-07 | 1993-10-07 | 1994-04-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1997-04-07 | 1997-10-07 | 1998-04-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |