Patent US4563430A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4563430A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of judging a particle agglutination pattern

Assignee: Olympus Corp
•
Filing: 1983-11-28
•
Granted: 1986-01-07
•
Expires: 2003-11-28
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract In a method of photoelectrically judging a particle agglutination pattern formed on a conical bottom surface of a reaction vessel by particles descending upon the bottom surface, at least two judging steps utilizing a total particle amount, a thickness ratio, an inclination and so on are applied to the particle agglutination pattern to judge finally the pattern as one of an integral pattern (-), an intermediate pattern (?) and a uniform deposition pattern (+). In this manner, since all the inaccurate patterns are judged finally as the intermediate pattern (?) and are re-examined, it is possible to always perform an accurate judgment for the particle agglutination pattern.

Inventors

  • 👤 Tokio Kano
  • 👤 Akira Tamagawa
  • 👤 Masanori Doi

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 21:32
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/75; G01N21/77; G01N21/82; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S436/00; Y10S436/805

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim 145 words
A method of photoelectrically judging a particle agglutination pattern formed on an inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel by particles descending on the bottom, comprising the steps of: scanning the particle agglutination pattern formed on the inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel to generate a plurality of photoelectrically converted output signals; deriving from said output signals a predetermined number of measurement values representing the thickness at varying locations of a particle layer deposited on the bottom surface of the reaction vessel; and effecting a first judging step utilizing said measurement values by comparing said measurement values to at least two references values to judge the particle agglutination pattern and, if the result is not indeterminate, effecting at least one additional judging step utilizing said measurement values by comparing said measurement values to at least two reference values to judge the particle agglutination pattern.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 145 words
A method of photoelectrically judging a particle agglutination pattern formed on an inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel by particles descending on the bottom, comprising the steps of: scanning the particle agglutination pattern formed on the inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel to generate a plurality of photoelectrically converted output signals; deriving from said output signals a predetermined number of measurement values representing the thickness at varying locations of a particle layer deposited on the bottom surface of the reaction vessel; and effecting a first judging step utilizing said measurement values by comparing said measurement values to at least two references values to judge the particle agglutination pattern and, if the result is not indeterminate, effecting at least one additional judging step utilizing said measurement values by comparing said measurement values to at least two reference values to judge the particle agglutination pattern.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 102 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein one of said judging steps comprises deriving a ratio r between a first thickness of the particle layer at a first portion thereof, the first portion including the lowermost point of the bottom surface, and a second thickness at a second portion thereof remote from the first portion; comparing said ratio r with two experimentally predetermined reference values R 1 and R 2 ; and judging the particle agglutination pattern in the following manner: r>R 1 : integral pattern (-) R 1 ≧r≧R 2 : intermediate pattern (?) r<R 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 97 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein one of said judging steps comprises deriving a difference ΔE between measurement values at a first portion of the particle layer, said first portion including the lowermost point of the bottom surface, and at a second portion thereof remote from the first portion; comparing the difference ΔE with two experimentally pre-determined reference values V 1 and V 2 ; and judging the particle agglutination pattern in the following manner: ΔE>V 1 : integral pattern (-) V 1 ≧ΔE≧V 2 : intermediate pattern (?) ΔE<V 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 94 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein one of said judging steps comprises deriving an average maximum inclination Δρ im from a distribution curve of the measurement values by averaging the two greatest inclinations between adjacent measurement values; comparing said average maximum inclination Δρ im with two experimentally pre-determined reference values H 1 and H 2 ; and judging the particle agglutination pattern in the following manner: Δρ im >H 1 : integral pattern (-) H 1 ≧Δρ im ≧H 2 : intermediate pattern (?) Δρ im <H 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 44 words
A method according to claim 4, wherein the reaction vessel has a conical bottom surface and the inclination Δρ im is derived as an average of two maximum inclinations obtained on respective sides of the distribution curve with respect to the center lowermost point.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 68 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein one of said judging steps comprises deriving a total particle amount S from said measurement values; comparing said total particle amount S with two experimentally pre-determined reference values S 1 and S 2 ; and judging the particle agglutination pattern in the following manner: S>S 1 : D (dark) S 1 ≧S≧S 2 : N (normal) S<S 2 : T (thin).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 21 words
A method according to claim 6, wherein said total particle amount S is derived by summing of all the measurement values.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method according to claim 6, wherein when said particle agglutination pattern is judged as D or T in the first judging step the result is indeterminate, the further judging steps are not applied to this pattern and said particle agglutination pattern is judged as an intermediate pattern (?).
Claim 10
Independent Claim 543 words
A method of judging photoelectrically a particle agglutination pattern formed on a conically-inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel by particles precipitating onto the bottom, comprising the steps of: scanning the particle agglutination pattern formed on the inclined bottom surface to generate a plurality of photoelectrically converted output signals representative of the thickness of the particle layer precipitated onto the bottom surface at a corresponding plurality of locations; subjecting the output signals to a first judging step comprising: summing said plurality of output signals to determine a total absorption S; experimentally determining the maximum total absorption S 1 and the minimum total absorption S 2 for which reliable pattern analysis may be conducted; comparing said total absorption S with the two experimentally determined reference values S 1 and S 2 , and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: S>S 1 : D (dark) S 1 ≧S≧S 2 : N (normal) S<S 2 : T (thin) if S is judged D (dark) or T (thin), outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and otherwise proceeding to a second judging step comprising: deriving a ratio r between a first group of output signals representing the thickness of the particle layer at a first portion thereof over the lowermost point of the bottom surface, and a second group of output signals representing a second portion of the layer remote from the first portion; experimentally determining the ratio R 1 which is the minimum ratio which reliably indicates an integral pattern, and the ratio R 2 which is the maximum ratio which reliably indicates a uniform deposition pattern; comparing said ratio r with the two experimentally determined reference values R 1 and R 2 and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: r>R 1 : integral pattern (-) R 1 ≧r≧R 2 : intermediate pattern (?) r<R 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+) if r is judged to have an intermediate pattern, outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and otherwise proceeding to a third judging step comprising: determining the two greatest values of inclination between output signals representing adjacent locations and averaging the two signals to produce an average maximum inclination Δρ im ; experimentally determining the minimum inclination H 1 which reliably indicates an integral pattern and the maximum inclination H 2 which reliably indicates a uniform deposition pattern; comparing said inclination Δρ im with the two experimentally determined reference values H 1 and H 2 and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: Δρ im >H 1 : integral pattern (-) H 1 ≧Δρ im ≧H 2 : intermediate pattern (?) Δρ im <H 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+); if Δρ im is judged to have an intermediate pattern, or if Δρ im is judged to have an integral pattern when r was judged to have a uniform deposition pattern, or if Δρ im is judged to have a uniform deposition pattern when r was judged to have an integral pattern, outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and if both r and Δρ im are judged to have an integral pattern, outputing a signal indicating an integral pattern, and if both r and Δρ im are judged to have a uniform deposition pattern, outputing a signal indicating a uniform deposition pattern.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 543 words
A method of judging photoelectrically a particle agglutination pattern formed on a conically-inclined bottom surface of a reaction vessel by particles precipitating onto the bottom, comprising the steps of: scanning the particle agglutination pattern formed on the inclined bottom surface to generate a plurality of photoelectrically converted output signals representative of the thickness of the particle layer precipitated onto the bottom surface at a corresponding plurality of locations; subjecting the output signals to a first judging step comprising: summing said plurality of output signals to determine a total absorption S; experimentally determining the maximum total absorption S 1 and the minimum total absorption S 2 for which reliable pattern analysis may be conducted; comparing said total absorption S with the two experimentally determined reference values S 1 and S 2 , and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: S>S 1 : D (dark) S 1 ≧S≧S 2 : N (normal) S<S 2 : T (thin) if S is judged D (dark) or T (thin), outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and otherwise proceeding to a second judging step comprising: deriving a ratio r between a first group of output signals representing the thickness of the particle layer at a first portion thereof over the lowermost point of the bottom surface, and a second group of output signals representing a second portion of the layer remote from the first portion; experimentally determining the ratio R 1 which is the minimum ratio which reliably indicates an integral pattern, and the ratio R 2 which is the maximum ratio which reliably indicates a uniform deposition pattern; comparing said ratio r with the two experimentally determined reference values R 1 and R 2 and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: r>R 1 : integral pattern (-) R 1 ≧r≧R 2 : intermediate pattern (?) r<R 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+) if r is judged to have an intermediate pattern, outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and otherwise proceeding to a third judging step comprising: determining the two greatest values of inclination between output signals representing adjacent locations and averaging the two signals to produce an average maximum inclination Δρ im ; experimentally determining the minimum inclination H 1 which reliably indicates an integral pattern and the maximum inclination H 2 which reliably indicates a uniform deposition pattern; comparing said inclination Δρ im with the two experimentally determined reference values H 1 and H 2 and judging the particle agglutination pattern as follows: Δρ im >H 1 : integral pattern (-) H 1 ≧Δρ im ≧H 2 : intermediate pattern (?) Δρ im <H 2 : uniform deposition pattern (+); if Δρ im is judged to have an intermediate pattern, or if Δρ im is judged to have an integral pattern when r was judged to have a uniform deposition pattern, or if Δρ im is judged to have a uniform deposition pattern when r was judged to have an integral pattern, outputing a signal indicating an indeterminate agglutination, and if both r and Δρ im are judged to have an integral pattern, outputing a signal indicating an integral pattern, and if both r and Δρ im are judged to have a uniform deposition pattern, outputing a signal indicating a uniform deposition pattern.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 12 words
A method according to claim 9, wherein 25 output signals are generated.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 113 words
A method according to claim 10, wherein r is determined by: producing a first signal representing the first group of output signals by averaging the output signals at the five points (x 11 to x 15 ) centered around the lowermost point of the inclined bottom surface; producing a second signal representing the output signals in the second group by averaging six output signals taken from points on either side of the lowermost point, spaced apart both from the first group and from an edge of the field tested (x 5 to x 7 and x 19 to x 21 ); and determining the ratio of the first signal to the second signal.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3520609A Cited
US3883308A Cited
US4197088A Cited
DE3033870A1 Cited
US4452759A Cited
EP0046430A1 Cited
US4452902A Cited
US4447396A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1989-01-06 1989-07-08 1990-01-07 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1993-01-06 1993-07-08 1994-01-07 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1997-01-06 1997-07-08 1998-01-07 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag