US4555807A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method for channel identification
Assignee: Lockheed Martin Corp
•
Filing: 1983-08-08
•
Granted: 1985-11-26
•
Expires: 2003-08-08
Abstract
Abstract An improvement to a baseband system having a plurality of down converters feeding a single baseband receiver for assuring the same mean time to intercept while maximizing the probability of intercept as a multi-band, autonomous receiver. All channels of the converter unit are operated simultaneously and a unique tag is added to the output signal from each of the down converters whereby the signal can be identified by the balance of the system as to its associated converter. In one embodiment, the tag comprises an amplitude notch appearing on the output signal at a different time following the receiver threshold being exceeded. In a second embodiment, the tag comprises a frequency step added to and/or subtracted from each output signal at the same time following the exceeding of the receiver threshold. In a third embodiment, the tag comprises a phase shift applied to the output signal.
Inventors
- 👤 William E. Bryant
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 10:58
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03D; H03D7/00; H03D7/16
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
114 words
The improvement to a baseband system having a plurality of down converters, each capable of producing a converter output signal, each having a mixer and local oscillator with all the converters feeding a single baseband receiver, comprising: (a) a plurality of tag producing means operably connected to respective ones of the down converters for selectively adding a tag, identifying the converter producing an output signal, to the output signal from that converter; and (b) tag initiation means operably connected to said tag producing means for initiating the adding of said tags to the output signals from the converters at a time preset for each tag in response to at least one converter output signal.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
114 words
The improvement to a baseband system having a plurality of down converters, each capable of producing a converter output signal, each having a mixer and local oscillator with all the converters feeding a single baseband receiver, comprising: (a) a plurality of tag producing means operably connected to respective ones of the down converters for selectively adding a tag, identifying the converter producing an output signal, to the output signal from that converter; and (b) tag initiation means operably connected to said tag producing means for initiating the adding of said tags to the output signals from the converters at a time preset for each tag in response to at least one converter output signal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
62 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 1 wherein: each of said tag producing means comprises a normally closed switch placed in line between the mixer and the local oscillator of the associated down converter whereby when said switch is opened, the local oscillator is disconnected and a tag in the form of an amplitude notch is added to the signal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
81 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 2 wherein: the receiver is adapted to sense a converter output signal and to cause each of said switches to open for a fixed amount of time at different, pre-set times for each down converter after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold, whereby each down converter's output signal can be identified by the time delay between the threshold being exceeded and the occurrence of said amplitude notch on its output signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
78 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 1 wherein each of said tag producing means comprises: (a) a step tuned local oscillator having a unique frequency shift for each down converter; and (b) shift producing means operably connected as part of said local oscillator for causing said oscillator to shift frequency its unique amount whereby the tag for each down converter comprises a unique, detectable step in frequency added to the output signal from each down converter.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
47 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 4 wherein: the receiver is adapted to sense a converter output signal and to activate said shift producing means for a fixed amount of time at a common, pre-set time after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
77 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 1 wherein each of said tag producing means comprises: (a) the local oscillator for each down converter having phase shift capability; and (b) shift producing means operably connected as part of said local oscillator for causing said oscillator to shift its phase a unique amount whereby the tag for each down converter comprises a unique, detectable phase shift in the frequency of the output signal from each down converter.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
62 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 6 wherein: (a) said phase shift is different for each local oscillator, and (b) the receiver is adapted to sense the phase of a converter output signal and to activate said shift producing means for a fixed amount of time at a common, pre-set time after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
55 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 6 wherein: the receiver is adapted to sense the phase of a converter output signal and to activate each of said shift producing means for a fixed amount of time at different, pre-set times for each down converter after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 1 wherein: each of the down converters is adapted to receive a different RF signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
15 words
The improvement to a baseband system of claim 1 wherein: the receiver detects the tags.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
102 words
The method of operating a baseband system having a plurality of down converters, each capable of producing a converter output signal, feeding a single baseband receiver to maximize the probability of signal intercept and minimize the mean time to signal intercept, comprising the steps of: (a) processing at least one input signal to produce at least one converter output signal; (b) sensing at least one converter output signal so produced; and (c) in response to said sensing step, adding at a preset time to a converter output signal a tag unique to the converter producing that output signal, for identifying said converter.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
102 words
The method of operating a baseband system having a plurality of down converters, each capable of producing a converter output signal, feeding a single baseband receiver to maximize the probability of signal intercept and minimize the mean time to signal intercept, comprising the steps of: (a) processing at least one input signal to produce at least one converter output signal; (b) sensing at least one converter output signal so produced; and (c) in response to said sensing step, adding at a preset time to a converter output signal a tag unique to the converter producing that output signal, for identifying said converter.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method of claim 11 wherein: each down converter comprises a mixer and a local oscillator operatively connected thereto, and wherein the step of adding a tag comprises the steps of: (a) disposing a normally closed switch in line between the mixer and the local oscillator of each down converter; and (b) opening the switch when a tag is desired to form the tag as an amplitude notch added to the signal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 12 wherein said step of adding a tag further includes the step of: opening each of the switches for a fixed amount of time at different, pre-set times for each down converter after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said step of adding a tag comprises the step of: selectively shifting the frequency of each converter output signal by a different amount to form the tag as a unique, detectable step in frequency.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 14 wherein said step of adding a tag further includes the step of: shifting the frequency of all the local oscillators for a fixed amount of time at the same, pre-set time after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said selective shifting step is accomplished by a plurality of step tuned local oscillators, each of said oscillators having a unique frequency shift for each down converter.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said step of adding a tag comprises the steps of: (a) employing a local oscillator having a phase shifter for each down converter; and (b) selectively shifting the phase of the local oscillator signal being mixed at the down converter to form the tag as a unique, detectable step change in phase.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 17 wherein each local oscillator has a different phase shift and said step of adding further includes the step of: shifting the phase of all the local oscillators for a fixed amount of time at the same, pre-set time after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 17 wherein said step of adding a tag further includes the step of: shifting the phase of the local oscillators for a fixed amount of time at different, pre-set times for each down converter after a converter output signal exceeds a preset threshold.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
10 words
The method of claim 11, further comprising: detecting the tag.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2888554A
Cited
US2975275A
Cited
US3201692A
Cited
US3248653A
Cited
US3320531A
Cited
US3401389A
Cited
US3681695A
Cited
US3833907A
Cited
US4027247A
Cited
US4152652A
Cited
US4352210A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1988-11-25 | 1989-05-27 | 1989-11-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1992-11-25 | 1993-05-27 | 1993-11-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1996-11-25 | 1997-05-27 | 1997-11-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |