Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
143 words
A smoke evacuation system for a vehicle comprising: a skin opening defined in an outer skin separating an interior compartment within said vehicle from an exterior environment surrounding said vehicle, said interior being capable of being maintained at a positive differential pressure with respect to said exterior; a cover plate for covering said opening and thereby preventing any flow of air therethrough; means for ejecting said cover plate from said opening; and a smoke disposal chute having a first end in fluid communication with a region within said compartment at which smoke may be expected to collect and a second end in fluid communication with said opening; whereby when said cover plate is ejected from said opening, any smoke-laden air in said region will be forced through said opening and evacuated into said external environment as a result of said positive pressure differential.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
143 words
A smoke evacuation system for a vehicle comprising: a skin opening defined in an outer skin separating an interior compartment within said vehicle from an exterior environment surrounding said vehicle, said interior being capable of being maintained at a positive differential pressure with respect to said exterior; a cover plate for covering said opening and thereby preventing any flow of air therethrough; means for ejecting said cover plate from said opening; and a smoke disposal chute having a first end in fluid communication with a region within said compartment at which smoke may be expected to collect and a second end in fluid communication with said opening; whereby when said cover plate is ejected from said opening, any smoke-laden air in said region will be forced through said opening and evacuated into said external environment as a result of said positive pressure differential.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising a grille in the vicinity of said first end for preventing the blockage of said chute by foreign objects.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
139 words
The system of claim 1, wherein said vehicle is a transport aircraft provided with an air conditioning pack for conditioning air from said external environment and introducing it under pressure into said interior compartment and with an overflow vent for providing an opening having a variable cross-sectional area in said skin of said aircraft for permitting a portion of said pressurized air to be controllably released to said external environment, and wherein the effective cross-sectional area of said opening after said cover plate has been ejected is less than the effective area of said vent during normal operation of said pack, whereby even after said cover plate has been ejected and said smoke evacuation system opening activated, said air conditioning pack will be able to continue to maintain the conditioned air inside said compartment at a predetermined normal pressure.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said ejecting means is activated in response to an electrical signal.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
44 words
The system of claim 4 wherein said ejection means comprises an electrically activated pyrotechnic fuse embedded in said cover plate so as to separate a central portion of said cover plate from a peripheral portion upon said electrical signal being applied to said fuse.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 4 further comprising a smoke detector circuit for generating said electrical signal upon the detection of smoke in said region.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
22 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising means for at least partially blocking said chute after said cover plate has been ejected.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
36 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the effective cross-sectional area of said second end is sufficiently small that said interior compartment will remain pressurized even after said cover plate has been ejected and said opening exposed.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
48 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the effective cross-sectional area of said first end is substantially larger than the cross-sectional area of said second end whereby the velocity of said smoke-laden air will be significantly less in the vicinity of said region compared to that at said opening.