Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
255 words
A method for steering an aerodynamic body, e.g. a missile or a projectile, after its firing in a flight path toward a target for interception, the body having a homing device generating an output signal (ε m ) which is a measurement of an error angle (ε) between a body-fixed axis, preferably the symmetry axis of the body, and a line of sight (S i ) from the body to the target, and the body being guided in response to a control variable signal (u, u m ) which is dependent on the angular rate (σ) of the line of sight, characterized in that a computing unit (10) which operates on the basis of relationships describing the aerodynamic behaviour of the body with respect to the target and has said control variable (u, u m ) of the body as an input signal, forms a first signal value (σ) representing the angular rate (σ) of the line of sight, which is employed to provide the control variable signal (u, u m ), and a second signal value (θ) representing the angular rate (θ) of the attitude of the body, that a third signal value (ε) representing an approximate value of the error angle (ε) is formed from said two signal values (σ, θ), that a difference signal value (Δε) between the measurement (ε m ) and the approximate value (ε) of the error angle (ε) is formed and is fed back to the computing unit for correcting quantities of the relationships of the computing unit.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
255 words
A method for steering an aerodynamic body, e.g. a missile or a projectile, after its firing in a flight path toward a target for interception, the body having a homing device generating an output signal (ε m ) which is a measurement of an error angle (ε) between a body-fixed axis, preferably the symmetry axis of the body, and a line of sight (S i ) from the body to the target, and the body being guided in response to a control variable signal (u, u m ) which is dependent on the angular rate (σ) of the line of sight, characterized in that a computing unit (10) which operates on the basis of relationships describing the aerodynamic behaviour of the body with respect to the target and has said control variable (u, u m ) of the body as an input signal, forms a first signal value (σ) representing the angular rate (σ) of the line of sight, which is employed to provide the control variable signal (u, u m ), and a second signal value (θ) representing the angular rate (θ) of the attitude of the body, that a third signal value (ε) representing an approximate value of the error angle (ε) is formed from said two signal values (σ, θ), that a difference signal value (Δε) between the measurement (ε m ) and the approximate value (ε) of the error angle (ε) is formed and is fed back to the computing unit for correcting quantities of the relationships of the computing unit.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
46 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the difference signal value (Δε), before being fed back to the computing unit (10), is multiplied by a correction factor (k 1 -k 6 ) corresponding to the respective quantity to be corrected in said relationships.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
42 words
A method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the correction factor (k 1 -k 6 ) is variable with respect to parameters and variables of the missile, and that the correction factor is updated in the course of the steering.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
149 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the signal value (θ) representing the attitude angular rate is determined on the basis of the equations θ=a.sub.1 θ+a.sub.2 α+b.sub.1 u α=θ+a.sub.3 α+b.sub.2 u where θ is the attitude angular rate and θ its time differential, α is the aerodynamic angle of attack and α its time differential, u is the control variable, a 1 , a 2 , a 3 are aerodynamic parameters, b 1 and b 2 are a torque and a force parameter, respectively, and that the signal value (σ) representing the line of sight angular rate is determined on the basis of the equation σ=(2σ+a.sub.3 α+b.sub.2 u)·V/r and in the cases of lesser accuracy requirements σ=0 where σ is the line of sight angular rate and σ the time differential thereof, V is the travelling speed of the body, r its distance to the target.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
79 words
Method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the difference signal value (Δε) is multiplied by a correction factor (k 1 -k 6 ) before being fed back to the computing unit, each factor corresponding to the respective quantity to be updated in said relationships, that said updating is performed for the torque and force parameters (b 1 , b 2 ) while the aerodynamic parameters (a 1 , a 2 , a 3 ) are maintained constant.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
259 words
An apparatus for steering an aerodynamic body, such as a missile or a projectile, after its firing towards a target for interception thereof, said body having a homing device (1) supplying an output signal (ε m ) which is a measurement of an error angle (ε) between a body-fixed axis (A), preferably the axis of symmetry of the body, and a line of sight (S i ) from the body to the target, and a unit (4) provided to determine a control variable signal (u, u m ) dependent upon the line of sight angular rate (σ), characterized by a computing unit (10) which operates on the basis of relationships describing the aerodynamic behaviour of the body with respect to the target and has the control variable signal (u, u m ) as an input signal for establishing a first signal value (σ) representing the line of sight angular rate (σ), said signal value being an input signal to the unit (4) for determining the control variable signal, and a second signal value (θ) for the body attitude angular rate (θ), a unit (20) for determining from said two signal values a third signal value (ε) representing an approximate value of the error angle (ε), a unit (12) for forming a difference signal value (Δε) between the measurement angle (εm) and the approximate signal value (ε), and a feed-back unit (13) provided to feed back to the computing unit (10) the difference signal value (Δε) of the error angle for correcting quantities of the relationships of the computing unit.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
259 words
An apparatus for steering an aerodynamic body, such as a missile or a projectile, after its firing towards a target for interception thereof, said body having a homing device (1) supplying an output signal (ε m ) which is a measurement of an error angle (ε) between a body-fixed axis (A), preferably the axis of symmetry of the body, and a line of sight (S i ) from the body to the target, and a unit (4) provided to determine a control variable signal (u, u m ) dependent upon the line of sight angular rate (σ), characterized by a computing unit (10) which operates on the basis of relationships describing the aerodynamic behaviour of the body with respect to the target and has the control variable signal (u, u m ) as an input signal for establishing a first signal value (σ) representing the line of sight angular rate (σ), said signal value being an input signal to the unit (4) for determining the control variable signal, and a second signal value (θ) for the body attitude angular rate (θ), a unit (20) for determining from said two signal values a third signal value (ε) representing an approximate value of the error angle (ε), a unit (12) for forming a difference signal value (Δε) between the measurement angle (εm) and the approximate signal value (ε), and a feed-back unit (13) provided to feed back to the computing unit (10) the difference signal value (Δε) of the error angle for correcting quantities of the relationships of the computing unit.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
47 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 6, characterized in that the feed-back unit (13) includes means (15) for modifying the error angle difference signal value (Δε) by multiplying the same by means of a factor (k 1 -k 6 ) corresponding to the respective quantity to be corrected.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
53 words
An apparatus as claimed in claim 6 or 7, characterized by a micro processor including said computing unit (10), said unit (4) for determining the control variable signal, said unit (20) for determining the third signal value (ε), said unit (12) for determining the difference signal value (Δε), and said feed-back unit (13).