Abstract The present invention relates to a method for examining the content of a volume of biological sample containing particles to determine the diagnostic significance of that volume of biological sample. A number of aliquots of the sample are distributed and are examined under low power field magnification. The total number of aliquots examined under low power field magnification is a first fraction of the volume of biological sample. The number of particles detected in the first fraction is counted. The number of particles detected is compared to a first known total. In the event the comparison yields the result that the sample contains diagnostically insignificant number of particles, then the method is terminated. Otherwise the method is continued. A second fraction of volume of the biological sample, comprising a plurality of aliquots, is examined under high power field magnification. The number of particles detected under high power magnification is totalled. This is then compared to a second known total. The diagnostic significance of the biological sample is determined by the comparison of the second total number of particles to the number of particles counted in the second fractional volume.
A method of determining the diagnostic significance of the content of a volume of biological sample containing particles, said method comprising the steps of: (a) distributing an aliquot of said sample over an extended area; (b) examining the aliquot under low resolution by a first microscopic means; (c) forming an optical still image of said extended area; (d) converting said optical image to an electronic image; (e) electronically counting the number of particles in said electronic image; (f) repeating the steps of (a)-(e) until the number of aliquot examined under low resolution equals a first a priori determined number of aliquots; (g) totalling the number of particles in said aliquots examined under low resolution; (h) comparing said number of particles totalled to a first a priori determined number of particles; (i) terminating said method, upon said comparison of the content of said volume of biological sample being diagnostically insignificant; otherwise (j) continuing said method based upon said comparison; (k) distributing an aliquot of said sample over an extended area; (l) examining the aliquot under high resolution by a second microscopic means; (m) forming an optical still image of said extended area; (n) converting said optical image to an electronic image; (o) electronically counting the number of particles in said electronic image; (p) repeating the steps of (k)-(o) until the number of aliquots examined under high resolution equals a second a priori determined number of aliquots; (q) totalling the number of particles in said aliquots examined under high resolution; (r) comparing said number of particles totalled to a second a priori determined number of particles; (s) determining the diagnostic significance of the content of said biological sample based upon said comparison.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
280 words
A method of determining the diagnostic significance of the content of a volume of biological sample containing particles, said method comprising the steps of: (a) distributing an aliquot of said sample over an extended area; (b) examining the aliquot under low resolution by a first microscopic means; (c) forming an optical still image of said extended area; (d) converting said optical image to an electronic image; (e) electronically counting the number of particles in said electronic image; (f) repeating the steps of (a)-(e) until the number of aliquot examined under low resolution equals a first a priori determined number of aliquots; (g) totalling the number of particles in said aliquots examined under low resolution; (h) comparing said number of particles totalled to a first a priori determined number of particles; (i) terminating said method, upon said comparison of the content of said volume of biological sample being diagnostically insignificant; otherwise (j) continuing said method based upon said comparison; (k) distributing an aliquot of said sample over an extended area; (l) examining the aliquot under high resolution by a second microscopic means; (m) forming an optical still image of said extended area; (n) converting said optical image to an electronic image; (o) electronically counting the number of particles in said electronic image; (p) repeating the steps of (k)-(o) until the number of aliquots examined under high resolution equals a second a priori determined number of aliquots; (q) totalling the number of particles in said aliquots examined under high resolution; (r) comparing said number of particles totalled to a second a priori determined number of particles; (s) determining the diagnostic significance of the content of said biological sample based upon said comparison.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first microscopic means and said second microscopic means are the same microscopic means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said biological sample is urine.