Patent US4508783A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4508783A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for the differentiated hardening of glass sheets, especially of automobile windshields, and tempered glass sheet
Assignee: Saint Gobain Vitrage SA
•
Filing: 1983-04-18
•
Granted: 1985-04-02
•
Expires: 2003-04-18
Abstract
Abstract The invention relates to a method of differentiated rate of hardening of a glass sheet by blowing a cooling gas in the direction of this sheet having two zones from nozzles. According to the invention, a simultaneous solidification of the glass sheet is produced at both zones of the sheet in spite of the differentiated treatments applied to establish a difference of hardening between the different zones of the sheet. Application is to the production of flat glass sheets.
Inventors
- 👤 Claude Aubry
- 👤 Jacques Chaumette
- 👤 Pierre Touchon
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 15:38
CPC Classifications
C; C03; C03B; C03B27/00; C03B27/04; C03B27/0404; C03B27/012; C03B27/0417; C03B27/052; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T428/00; Y10T428/31; Y10T428/315
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of differentially tempering a flat glass sheet so as to harden the entire surface of said sheet, said sheet including a central zone and a peripheral zone having mutually different degrees of surface hardening, said method including steps of: uniformly heating said entire glass sheet to a degree sufficient for tempering to occur upon cooling; rapidly cooling said central zone at a first rate sufficient to temper said glass sheet; and subsequent to beginning said cooling of said central zone, rapidly cooling said peripheral zone at a second rate sufficient to temper said glass sheet, said second rate being greater than said first rate, wherein said cooling steps are performed such that both of said zones of said glass sheet are simultaneously solidified.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
125 words
A method of differentially tempering a flat glass sheet so as to harden the entire surface of said sheet, said sheet including a central zone and a peripheral zone having mutually different degrees of surface hardening, said method including steps of: uniformly heating said entire glass sheet to a degree sufficient for tempering to occur upon cooling; rapidly cooling said central zone at a first rate sufficient to temper said glass sheet; and subsequent to beginning said cooling of said central zone, rapidly cooling said peripheral zone at a second rate sufficient to temper said glass sheet, said second rate being greater than said first rate, wherein said cooling steps are performed such that both of said zones of said glass sheet are simultaneously solidified.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the degree by which said cooling step in said central zone is begun between 0.1 and 2.5 seconds before said cooling step in said peripheral zone, whereby visibility through said sheet, after fragmentation, is at least 15% of visibility before fragmentation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said cooling steps are performed by holding said sheet vertically, positioning air blowing boxes on both sides of said sheet so as to blow cooling air over said sheet, and vertically reciprocating said blowing boxes.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
91 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said cooling steps are carried out over both of said zones by blowing air over said sheet, and are differently carried out for said two zones in a manner such that: (a) visibility through said central zone of said sheet, after fragmentation, is at least 15% of visibility before fragmentation; and (b) the glass of said peripheral zone, after fragmentation, shatters into between 40 and 350 fragments per 5 cm 2 of said sheet and with fragment pieces no larger than 7.5 cm in length.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
128 words
Glass sheet characterized in that it presents a central zone of at least 20 cm×50 cm, having after fragmentation a visibility of at least 15% of visibility before fragmentation, this ratio being determined by the total of the surfaces of all fragments of at least 2 cm 2 divided by the total surface of the central zone, no fragment in this zone being allowed to have a surface area greater than 16 cm 2 , and characterized in that it presents also a peripheral zone having after fragmentation in a square of 5 cm×5 cm, from 40 to 350 fragments, having no needles greater than 7.5 cm in length, said glass sheet being flat, wherein said glass sheet has no hoop stresses between said central and peripheral zones.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
128 words
Glass sheet characterized in that it presents a central zone of at least 20 cm×50 cm, having after fragmentation a visibility of at least 15% of visibility before fragmentation, this ratio being determined by the total of the surfaces of all fragments of at least 2 cm 2 divided by the total surface of the central zone, no fragment in this zone being allowed to have a surface area greater than 16 cm 2 , and characterized in that it presents also a peripheral zone having after fragmentation in a square of 5 cm×5 cm, from 40 to 350 fragments, having no needles greater than 7.5 cm in length, said glass sheet being flat, wherein said glass sheet has no hoop stresses between said central and peripheral zones.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
FR1038439A
Cited
GB704312A
Cited
US3251670A
Cited
US3251726A
Cited
US3186815A
Cited
GB1212208A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1988-04-01 | 1988-10-01 | 1989-04-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1992-04-01 | 1992-10-01 | 1993-04-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1996-04-01 | 1996-10-01 | 1997-04-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |