Patent US16808A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4475482A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4475482A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Sootblowing optimization
Assignee: Elsag International BV
•
Filing: 1984-01-23
•
Granted: 1984-10-09
•
Expires: 2004-01-23
Abstract
Abstract A method for predicting the optimum cycle time to schedule sootblowing using on-line process measurements. The optimum cycle times dynamically adjust to changing conditions resulting from boiler operation, fuel changes, or seasonal changes. The optimum cycle time is calculated four times per second for each heat trap of a boiler (10). The optimum conditions are based on economic criteria which account for heat trap fouling, rate of fouling of other heat traps (12, 13, 14, 16, and 18) within the boiler, and on-line boiler incremental steam cost.
Inventors
- 👤 William H. Moss
- 👤 Lawrence Popiel
- 👤 Thomas J. Scheib
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 14:17
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/0205; G05B13/021
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 4
Claim 1
Independent Claim
170 words
A method of optimizing cycle time (θ opt ) to schedule sootblowing during the operation of a boiler having an input of fluid with a particular specific heat (c p ) to generate steam at a particular cost per unit of heat in the boiler comprising: sensing the input and output temperatures of fluid to and from a boiler to obtain a difference (Δt) of input and output temperatures, sensing a flow rate (m) of the fluid in the boiler during its operation, determining an incremental cost of steam (Φ), with the time for actual sootblowing (θ c ) being known to determine the cost of steam for sootblowing (S), calculating the heat flux (q) of the boiler during its operation according to the equation q=mc p Δt, calculating two scaling parameters (K and P) according to the equation K=q o (m.sub.θ.sbsb.b /m o ) and P=[Kθ b /(q o -q.sub.θ.sbsb.b)]-θ b and using values for T, K, S to calculate the optimum cycle time according to the relationship: ##EQU12##
Claim 2
Independent Claim
170 words
A method of optimizing cycle time (θ opt ) to schedule sootblowing during the operation of a boiler having an input of fluid with a particular specific heat (c p ) to generate steam at a particular cost per unit of heat in the boiler comprising: sensing the input and output temperatures of fluid to and from a boiler to obtain a difference (Δt) of input and output temperatures, sensing a flow rate (m) of the fluid in the boiler during its operation, determining an incremental cost of steam (Φ), with the time for actual sootblowing (θ c ) being known to determine the cost of steam for sootblowing (S), calculating the heat flux (q) of the boiler during its operation according to the equation q=mc p Δt, calculating two scaling parameters (K and P) according to the equation K=q o (m.sub.θ.sbsb.b /m o ) and P=[Kθ b /(q o -q.sub.θ.sbsb.b)]-θ b and using values for T, K, S to calculate the optimum cycle time according to the relationship: ##EQU12##
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
71 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the boiler includes a plurality of heat traps each with its own input of fluid including sensing the input and output temperatures for each heat trap, sensing the flow rate through each heat trap and calculating values for P and K to obtain optimum cycle times for each heat trap, determining optimum cycle time θ opt for each heat trap for optimum economic efficiency.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
50 words
A method, according to claims 1 or 2, wherein the optimum economic cycle time is determined, and the difference between time since previous sootblowing and optimum economic cycle time is determined for each heat trap, where the heat trap having the largest negative difference is exposed to a sootblowing operation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2948013A
Cited
US3396706A
Cited
US3680531A
Cited
US3831561A
Cited
US3785351A
Cited
US4085438A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1987-10-09 | 1988-04-09 | 1988-10-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1991-10-09 | 1992-04-09 | 1992-10-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1995-10-09 | 1996-04-09 | 1996-10-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |