Patent US4454947A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4454947A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Product inspection and ejection system

Assignee: Olin Corp
•
Filing: 1981-12-07
•
Granted: 1984-06-19
•
Expires: 2001-12-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method of removing product of an unacceptable height from a product line is disclosed. In the method, a quantity of the product is arrayed in a carrier and moved to a gauging station where the array is placed between a reference plate and a corresponding array of gauging members and gauged by raising the reference plate to a predetermined height position and measuring the height of the gauging members when the gauging members are supported on the product array. The signals from the gauging station are stored and the carrier plate is moved to a rejection station where unacceptable product is selectively removed in response to the stored rejection signals from the gauging station. The carrier plate is then returned to the product line with only acceptable product still in place.

Inventors

  • 👤 Bernard J. Jacobsmeyer
  • 👤 Gary D. Reding

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 17:19
CPC Classifications
B; B07; B07C; B07C5/00; B07C5/04; B07C5/08; B07C5/083; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S209/00; Y10S209/925; Y10S209/936

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim 239 words
A method of automatically removing products of an unacceptable height from an array of products in a production line, which comprises the steps of: (a) supporting a quantity of said products in a product carrier in an array of rows and columns; (b) moving said carrier to a gauging station; (c) placing said array between a planar reference plate and an array of gauging members of known height; (d) uniformly raising said planar reference plate, relative to said carrier plate and said gauging members, to a predetermined height position so as to cause said planar reference plate to support said product array and said product array in turn to support said array of gauging members; (e) measuring the height of each gauging member in said array of supported gauging members; (f) generating a first rejection signal corresponding to each gauge member whose height is not within a predetermined range; (g) storing said first rejection signals; (h) lowering said planar reference plate, relative to said carrier plate and said gauging members, so that said product array is again supported by said carrier plate; (i) moving said carrier plate to a rejection station; (j) selectively activating a product removal device in response to said first rejection signals so as to automatically remove from said carrier plate only those products corresponding to gauging members which had an unacceptable height during said measuring; and (k) returning said carrier plate to said production line.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 239 words
A method of automatically removing products of an unacceptable height from an array of products in a production line, which comprises the steps of: (a) supporting a quantity of said products in a product carrier in an array of rows and columns; (b) moving said carrier to a gauging station; (c) placing said array between a planar reference plate and an array of gauging members of known height; (d) uniformly raising said planar reference plate, relative to said carrier plate and said gauging members, to a predetermined height position so as to cause said planar reference plate to support said product array and said product array in turn to support said array of gauging members; (e) measuring the height of each gauging member in said array of supported gauging members; (f) generating a first rejection signal corresponding to each gauge member whose height is not within a predetermined range; (g) storing said first rejection signals; (h) lowering said planar reference plate, relative to said carrier plate and said gauging members, so that said product array is again supported by said carrier plate; (i) moving said carrier plate to a rejection station; (j) selectively activating a product removal device in response to said first rejection signals so as to automatically remove from said carrier plate only those products corresponding to gauging members which had an unacceptable height during said measuring; and (k) returning said carrier plate to said production line.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said measuring comprises passing at least one eddy current sensor along said array of product-supported gauging members to generate a measurement signal corresponding to the heights of said gauging members.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 65 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said generation of said first rejection signal comprises the substeps of: (a) producing an eddy current calibration signal corresponding to a lower height limit; (b) producing an eddy current calibration signal corresponding to an upper height limit; and (c) generating an error indication only when said eddy current measurement signal is not between said two eddy current calibration signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 53 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said selective activation of said removal device further comprises: (a) moving said carrier plate from a horizontal initial position to a partially vertical position; (b) removing unacceptable products from said carrier plate in said partially vertical position; and (c) returning said carrier plate to said horizontal position.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 93 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: (a) moving said carrier plate to an inspection station following said selective product removal; (b) inspecting for presence of product in each position of said carrier plate; (c) generating a set of inspection signals indicative of presence and absence of product in said positions; (d) comparing said set of inspection signals with said stored first rejection signals; and (e) generating an error indication if said set of inspection signals indicate presence of a product which said stored first rejection signals indicate is unacceptable.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of claim 5 which further comprises the step of: preventing said carrier plate from proceeding along said production line if said error signal is generated.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 110 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of: (a) moving said carrier plate through an inspection station after said height measuring but before activation of the product removal device; (b) checking at said inspection station for presence or absence of a certain component of said product at each product location in said product array; (c) generating a second rejection signal corresponding to each array location where said component is not sensed; (d) storing said second rejection signals; (e) activating said product removal device in response to said second rejection signals so as to also automatically remove from said carrier plate those products not having the component checked for.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 48 words
The method of claim 7 wherein said checking includes the step of: attempting to pass a photoelectric beam through each of said products in said product array in such a way that said beam must pass through the location where said component would be found in acceptable products.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 8 wherein said product is an ammunition primer and said component is a foil.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 30 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said product is a percussive ammunition primer having an anvil and said supported gauging members are supported by said anvil during said measuring step.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

DE79385C Cited
GB190911669A Cited
US2393246A Cited
US2715962A Cited
US2781126A Cited
US2859871A Cited
US3422542A Cited
US3712466A Cited
US3680966A Cited
US3736793A Cited
US3863349A Cited
US3969228A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1987-06-19 1987-12-19 1988-06-19 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1991-06-19 1991-12-19 1992-06-19 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1995-06-19 1995-12-19 1996-06-19 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag