Patent US4370285A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4370285A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of production of a lightweight building element
Assignee: Schneider GmbH and Co KG
•
Filing: 1980-10-07
•
Granted: 1983-01-25
•
Expires: 2000-10-07
Abstract
Abstract A method of producing lightweight building blocks, in which an expandable or foamable ceramic material is charged into a mold, compacted and then fired with subsequent cooling.
Inventors
- 👤 Christian Pluck
- 👤 Peter Schuster
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 14:25
CPC Classifications
B; B28; B28B; B28B3/00; B28B3/02; B28B3/10; B28B1/00; B28B1/008; B28B1/50; C; C04; C04B; C04B38/00; C04B38/06; C04B38/063; C04B38/0635; C04B38/064
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
121 words
A process of producing a lightweight building element from foamed ceramics or expanded clay aggregate, wherein expandable or foamable material is heaped in bulk into a mold, including the steps of precompacting the heaped material in the mold to obtain a molded body by performing an inhomogeneous compaction with the peripheral zones of the molded body being subjected to compaction higher than that of a core zone thereof, whereby a free space results from the higher compaction; filling said free space with additionally heaped material; finally compressing the material to obtain the precompacted body; and thereafter firing the precompacted body so that the material thereof will expand in a desired manner with subsequent cooling of the mold and the molded body.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
121 words
A process of producing a lightweight building element from foamed ceramics or expanded clay aggregate, wherein expandable or foamable material is heaped in bulk into a mold, including the steps of precompacting the heaped material in the mold to obtain a molded body by performing an inhomogeneous compaction with the peripheral zones of the molded body being subjected to compaction higher than that of a core zone thereof, whereby a free space results from the higher compaction; filling said free space with additionally heaped material; finally compressing the material to obtain the precompacted body; and thereafter firing the precompacted body so that the material thereof will expand in a desired manner with subsequent cooling of the mold and the molded body.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
56 words
Process as per claim 1, wherein said precompacting step includes cupola-shaped compaction of the exposed surface of the heaped material when prism-shaped bodies are to be produced, with recesses of funnel-like shape resulting thereby in the cross section toward the perimeter, these recesses being filled with heaped material until a level exposed surface will result thereby.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
44 words
Process as per claim 1 or 2, including using granulates of a size range from 0.3 to 3.0 mm with a moisture content of 8 to 10% by weight of water, and wherein the compaction of the heaped material is ensued by dry pressing.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
24 words
Process as per claim 1 or 3, wherein the stock in the mold results from additional filling with heaped material, being subjected to recompaction.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
17 words
Process as per claim 4, wherein the precompaction is ensued at one-tenth of the pressure for recompaction.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
47 words
Process as per claim 4 or 5, wherein the heaped material is precompacted to cupola shape with a cupola radius of 1500 mm, the free spaces exposed by compaction then being additionally filled with identical heaped material and the recompaction then being made at approximately 250 bar.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
Process as per claim 4 or 6, including the step of recompacting the stock in the mold, with the stock being compressed into a dry-pressed ceramic firing mold during recompaction.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
31 words
Process as per claim 7, including using for the firing mold a ceramically dry-pressed mold of a shrinkage that is identical or approximately identical to the shrinkage of the compacted blank.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
37 words
Process as per claim 7 or 8, including using a firing mold consisting of the material as heaped, with merely the expanding or foaming agent being absent therein or being present only in limited, preferably ineffectual, quantities.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
38 words
Process as per claim 7 or 9, including the step of using for the firing mold a granulate with a size range from 0.3 to 3.0 mm and having a pressing moisture of 8 to 10% by weight.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
Process as per claim 7 or 10, including the step of simultaneously shaping the firing mold and compressing the blank into the firing mold in one operating step during the recompaction of the blank.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
41 words
Process as per claim 7 or 11, including the step of merely cutting off the side walls of the firing mold after cooling, so that the bottom of the firing mold will remain as protective layer on the lightweight building element.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
32 words
Process as per claim 7 or 9, including using for the firing mold an aggregate of approximately 25% by weight alumina, 25% by weight sewage-sludge ash and 50% by weight stoneware clay.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2241441A
Cited
DE1181611B
Cited
US3619861A
Cited
US3745201A
Cited
DE1914372C3
Cited
US3717693A
Cited
US4057383A
Cited
DE2604793A1
Cited
US4207114A
Cited
DE2724010A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1986-01-24 | 1986-07-26 | 1987-01-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1990-01-24 | 1990-07-26 | 1991-01-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1994-01-24 | 1994-07-26 | 1995-01-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |