Patent US4358738A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4358738A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Signal presence determination method for use in a contaminated medium

Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1976-06-07
•
Granted: 1982-11-09
•
Expires: 1996-06-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A signal presence detection method for use in systems where a multiplicity of types of noise is expected, wherein the spectral characteristics of the input wave is compared with corresponding characteristics of the expected noise wave and wherein the determination that signal is present is made only if the input wave mismatches all of the compared noise waves' spectral characteristics. Another embodiment of the invention compares the waveshape of the input wave and the noise waveshape. As a result of this procedure, a sensitive signal presence indication is obtained which is relatively immune to noise level.

Inventors

  • 👤 Leonard R. Kahn

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-26 11:46
CPC Classifications
G; G10; G10L; G10L25/00; G10L25/78; H; H03; H03G; H03G3/00; H03G3/20; H03G3/30; H03G3/34; H03G3/342

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim 68 words
A signal presence determination method for use in systems where a multiplicity of types of noise waves, having different spectral characteristics, are expected, comprising: comparing at least one spectral characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding characteristic of each of the expected noise waves, and making a determination that signal is present only if the input wave mismatches all of the different compared noise waves' spectrum characteristics.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 68 words
A signal presence determination method for use in systems where a multiplicity of types of noise waves, having different spectral characteristics, are expected, comprising: comparing at least one spectral characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding characteristic of each of the expected noise waves, and making a determination that signal is present only if the input wave mismatches all of the different compared noise waves' spectrum characteristics.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the comparison step comprises frequency segmenting the input wave, weighting the segments so as to correspond with each type of noise or interference wave expected having different spectral characteristics, and feeding the weighted waves to level matching circuits.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the comparison step comprises segmenting the input wave and feeding the output of the segments to individual weighting circuits for each type of noise or interference having different spectral characteristics compared and feeding the weighted components to amplitude level matching circuits.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 90 words
A system for determining the presence of signal in a communication channel wherein a specific type of noise and/or interference is expected, comprising; (a) means for determining a waveshape characteristic of the input wave, (b) means for comparing said waveshape characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding waveshape characteristic of the expected noise and/or interference wave to determine if the input wave matches the expected noise and/or interference thus indicating the absence of signal, and (c) means for utilizing the result of the comparison made in the (b) means.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 90 words
A system for determining the presence of signal in a communication channel wherein a specific type of noise and/or interference is expected, comprising; (a) means for determining a waveshape characteristic of the input wave, (b) means for comparing said waveshape characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding waveshape characteristic of the expected noise and/or interference wave to determine if the input wave matches the expected noise and/or interference thus indicating the absence of signal, and (c) means for utilizing the result of the comparison made in the (b) means.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 55 words
The system of claim 4 wherein a multiplicity of types of noise or interference waves are expected and wherein a multiplicity of waveshape comparison means are provided and the determination of signal presence is made on the basis that, if the waveshape approximates any one of the compared noise or interference waves, signal is absent.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for determining the presence of signal waves in an information bearing channel as distinguished from two or more types of noise waves each of said noise waves having different distinguishable spectral characteristics, comprising: (a) segmenting the bandpass of the communications channel, (b) separately comparing the relative amplitude of the spectral segments segmented in step (a) with the predetermined spectral characteristics of each of said noise waves, and (c) producing an indication that signal is absent if spectral components are sensed which approximately match the relative spectral characteristics of any of said noise waves as determined in step (b).
Claim 9
Independent Claim 100 words
A method for determining the presence of signal waves in an information bearing channel as distinguished from two or more types of noise waves each of said noise waves having different distinguishable spectral characteristics, comprising: (a) segmenting the bandpass of the communications channel, (b) separately comparing the relative amplitude of the spectral segments segmented in step (a) with the predetermined spectral characteristics of each of said noise waves, and (c) producing an indication that signal is absent if spectral components are sensed which approximately match the relative spectral characteristics of any of said noise waves as determined in step (b).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method, according to claim 6, including the additional step of squelching the signal when it is determined that signal is absent or too weak in amplitude to be useful for a desired function.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 31 words
The method, according to claim 6, including the step of causing a device to operate, if it is determine that signal is present of sufficient strength to perform a desired function.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method, according to claim 8, where said device is a microphone system.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method, according to claim 8, where said device is a recording system.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 26 words
The method of claim 8, where said device is a multimicrophone system where only a portion of the microphones should be active at a given time.
Claim 15
Independent Claim 109 words
A system for determining the presence of a signal in a system where two or more different types of noise, having different spectral characteristics, may be present, comprising: (a) filter means for segmenting the bandpass of the system, (b) a multiplicity of weighting means for adjusting the levels of each filtered segment so as to equalize the level of each type of noise expected, (c) a multiplicity of comparison means wherein the weighted levels produced in the means of (b) are compared and when any of the comparisons indicate a noise match a measurable condition is produced, and (d) means for utilizing the measured condition determined in (c) means.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 109 words
A system for determining the presence of a signal in a system where two or more different types of noise, having different spectral characteristics, may be present, comprising: (a) filter means for segmenting the bandpass of the system, (b) a multiplicity of weighting means for adjusting the levels of each filtered segment so as to equalize the level of each type of noise expected, (c) a multiplicity of comparison means wherein the weighted levels produced in the means of (b) are compared and when any of the comparisons indicate a noise match a measurable condition is produced, and (d) means for utilizing the measured condition determined in (c) means.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system of claim 12 where the system is used to squelch the audio output whenever there is a noise match.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 30 words
The system of claim 12 where the system is used as part of a multimicrophone arrangement to activate microphone circuits which at a given time are picking up desired signals.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 23 words
The system of claim 12 wherein the (d) means is a gate which squelches a signal amplifier whenever there is a noise match.
Claim 20
Independent Claim 65 words
A method of detecting the presence of a signal comprising: comparing at least one spectral characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding spectral characteristic of one or more types of noise, also further comparing at least one waveshape characteristic of the input waves with the corresponding characteristic of a type of noise, and indicating signal only if all of the comparisons made indicate mismatch.
Claim 21
Independent Claim 65 words
A method of detecting the presence of a signal comprising: comparing at least one spectral characteristic of the input wave with the corresponding spectral characteristic of one or more types of noise, also further comparing at least one waveshape characteristic of the input waves with the corresponding characteristic of a type of noise, and indicating signal only if all of the comparisons made indicate mismatch.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US2761897A Cited
US3213372A Cited
US3238457A Cited
US3337808A Cited
US3538253A Cited
US3676783A Cited
US3965428A Cited
US3988679A Cited
US4122452A Cited
US3894285A Cited
US4044309A Cited
US4035729A Cited
US4143325A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1985-11-08 1986-05-10 1986-11-09 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1989-11-08 1990-05-10 1990-11-09 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1993-11-08 1994-05-10 1994-11-09 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag