Petroleum recovery chemical retention prediction technique

Claim 3

The method of claim 1 comprising an additional step wherein produced fluids concentration profiles are obtained from a second actual injection-soak-production cycle conducted in the core which are compared with the corresponding simulated produced fluids concentration profiles for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the simulations.

Claim 4

The method of claim 2 comprising an additional step wherein, if the actual second cycle produced fluids concentration profiles differ from the corresponding simulated profiles by more than an acceptable level, the retention and dispersion parameters from steps (b) and (c) of claim 1 are adjusted in order to bring the differences between the actual second cycle profiles and the corresponding simulated profile to within acceptable levels.

Claim 5

The method of claim 1 wherein the retained chemical comprises a combination of a least two different chemical compounds.

Claim 6

In a petroleum recovery method wherein a chemical is injected into an underground petroleum reservoir, the chemical being of a type which will be retained to some extent within the reservoir, wherein the chemical is injected in an amount in excess of that which would be retained within the reservoir wherein the retained amount is determined by a method comprising: (a) conducting a first injection-soak-production cycle in a core with a volume of a fluid which comprises the retained chemical and a non-retained tracer material; (b) obtaining from a produced fluids concentration profile of the tracer the core volume contacted and a dispersion parameter describing the dispersion effects for a non-retained material within the core; (c) obtaining retention parameters for the retained chemical by comparing the produced fluids concentration profile of the retained chemical with a simulated produced fluids concentration profile of the retained chemical for this cycle obtained from a chemical flood mathematical model of the core; (d) simulating within the chemical flood mathematical model at least one more injection-soak-production cycle in the well utilizing a fluid of the same volume and comprising the same concentration of the retained chemical as in step (a) until such time as the simulated produced fluid concentration profile of the chemical is essentially the same as the actual produced fluid concentration profile of tracer from step (a); (e) determining the amount of chemical retained within the contacted core volume by summing the amount of the chemical retained in step (a) and the amounts of the chemical retained in the simulated cycles of step (d); (f) determining the amount of the chemical that is retained per unit volume by those portions of the core undergoing the chemical flood by dividing the summed amount of chemical retained in step (e) the core volume contacted in the cyclic test from step (a); and (g) determining the amount of chemical retained within the reservoir by calculation from the value obtained from step (f).

Claim 7

In a petroleum recovery method wherein a chemical is injected into an underground petroleum reservoir, the chemical being of a type which will be retained to some extent within the reservoir, wherein the chemical is injected in an amount in excess of that which would be retained within the reservoir wherein the retained amount is determined by a method comprising: (a) conducting a first injection-soak-production cycle in a core with a volume of a fluid which comprises the retained chemical and a non-retained tracer material; (b) obtaining from a produced fluids concentration profile of the tracer the core volume contacted and a dispersion parameter describing the dispersion effects for a non-retained material within the core; (c) obtaining retention parameters for the retained chemical by comparing the produced fluids concentration profile of the retained chemical with a simulated produced fluids concentration profile of the retained chemical for this cycle obtained from a chemical flood mathematical model of the core; (d) simulating within the chemical flood mathematical model at least one more injection-soak-production cycle in the well utilizing a fluid of the same volume and comprising the same concentration of the retained chemical as in step (a) until such time as the simulated produced fluid concentration profile of the chemical is essentially the same as the actual produced fluid concentration profile of tracer from step (a); (e) determining the amount of chemical retained within the contacted core volume by summing the amount of the chemical retained in step (a) and the amounts of the chemical retained in the simulated cycles of step (d); (f) determining the amount of the chemical that is retained per unit volume by those portions of the core undergoing the chemical flood by dividing the summed amount of chemical retained in step (e) the core volume contacted in the cyclic test from step (a); and (g) determining the amount of chemical retained within the reservoir by calculation from the value obtained from step (f).

Claim 8

The method of claim 5 comprising an additional step wherein produced fluids concentration profiles are obtained from a second actual injection-soak-production cycle conducted in the core which are compared with the corresponding simulated produced fluids concentration profiles for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the simulations.

Claim 9

The method of claim 6 comprising an additional step wherein, if the actual second cycle produced fluids concentration profiles differ from the corresponding simulated profiles by more than an acceptable level, the retention and dispersion parameters from steps (b) and (c) of claim 1 are adjusted in order to bring the differences between the actual second cycle profiles and the corresponding simulated profile to within acceptable levels.

Claim 10

The method claim 5 wherein the core is taken from the reservoir.

Claim 11

The method of claim 5 wherein the retained chemical comprises a combination of at least two different chemical compounds.