Patent US310675A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4255049A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4255049A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Non-destructive testing of structural elements for fatigue by measurement of specular reflectance

Assignee: Dornier System GmbH
•
Filing: 1978-11-02
•
Granted: 1981-03-10
•
Expires: 1998-11-02
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue in structural elements is determined by measuring the loss in specular reflection in a foil of polished metal secured to an exposed surface of the tested object, the elastic limit of the foil material under shearing stresses being lower than that of the tested object, and the foil consisting either of a single crystal or of polycrystalline material of uniform, small grain size.

Inventors

  • 👤 Karl-Frieder Sahm
  • 👤 Enno van Rensen
  • 👤 Horst Rieger
  • 👤 Franz Jaeger

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 22:27
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N3/00; G01N3/02; G01N3/06; G01N3/068; G01N2203/00; G01N2203/0058; G01N2203/006; G01N2203/0067

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim 104 words
A non-destructive method of testing an object for repetitive stresses which comprises the steps of applying to a stressed surface portion of said object one major face of at least one piece of a single crystal foil material in area contact, the other major face of said foil material being polished to high specular reflectance, and measuring the reduction of said specular reflectance after application of said stresses to said object, said foil material having an elastic limit lower than the elastic limit of the material of said surface portion, and lower than the stresses transmitted to said foil material from said surface portion.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 104 words
A non-destructive method of testing an object for repetitive stresses which comprises the steps of applying to a stressed surface portion of said object one major face of at least one piece of a single crystal foil material in area contact, the other major face of said foil material being polished to high specular reflectance, and measuring the reduction of said specular reflectance after application of said stresses to said object, said foil material having an elastic limit lower than the elastic limit of the material of said surface portion, and lower than the stresses transmitted to said foil material from said surface portion.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 124 words
A non-destructive method of testing an object for repetitive stresses which comprises the steps of applying to a stressed surface portion of said object one major face of at least one piece of a foil material in area contact, the other major face of said foil material being polished to high specular reflectance, and measuring the reduction of said specular reflectance after application of said stresses to said object, said foil material having an elastic limit lower than the elastic limit of the material of said surface portion, and lower than the stresses transmitted to said foil material from said surface portion, wherein said foil material is polycrystalline, the crystals in said material being not greater than 0.5 mm and substantially uniform in size.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 124 words
A non-destructive method of testing an object for repetitive stresses which comprises the steps of applying to a stressed surface portion of said object one major face of at least one piece of a foil material in area contact, the other major face of said foil material being polished to high specular reflectance, and measuring the reduction of said specular reflectance after application of said stresses to said object, said foil material having an elastic limit lower than the elastic limit of the material of said surface portion, and lower than the stresses transmitted to said foil material from said surface portion, wherein said foil material is polycrystalline, the crystals in said material being not greater than 0.5 mm and substantially uniform in size.
Claim 5
Independent Claim 50 words
A method as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein a plurality of said pieces is applied to said surface portion, each of said pieces being most sensitive to said transmitted stresses in a predetermined direction, the predetermined directions being angularly offset from each other in the applied pieces.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 53 words
A method as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein said surface portion is of arcuate cross section, a body being interposed between said surface portion and said one major face in conforming, stress-transmitting engagement with said surface portion and with said one major face, said one major face being substantially planar.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 22 words
A method as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein said foil material has a thickness of 10 to 100 μm.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 27 words
A method as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein at least 99.99% of the weight of said foil material consists of aluminum, indium, or tin.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3272003A Cited
US3462223A Cited
DE2063913A1 Cited
US3715915A Cited
DE2417232C3 Cited
US4015465A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1984-03-09 1984-09-08 1985-03-10 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1988-03-09 1988-09-08 1989-03-10 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1992-03-09 1992-09-08 1993-03-10 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag