Patent US4197643A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4197643A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Orthodontic appliance of titanium alloy
Assignee: University of Connecticut
•
Filing: 1978-03-14
•
Granted: 1980-04-15
•
Expires: 1998-03-14
Abstract
Abstract A beta-titanium alloy wire is used as the force-imparting component in orthodontic appliances. The alloy provides up to a threefold improvement over 18-8 stainless steel wire in load deflection rate and a twofold increase in maximum elastic displacement while providing a low modulus of elasticity and optimum low level force magnitudes. The wire also finds utility as ligature wires, as clasps and related structures in orthodontic and prosthetic appliances and as surgical arch bars for jaw fractures and the like.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles J. Burstone
- 👤 A. Jon Goldberg
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 19:21
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61C; A61C7/00; A61C7/12
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
159 words
In an orthodontic appliance having a force-imparting wire for applying corrective forces to a tooth, said wire having a cross section in the range of about 0.1 mm. to 2.0 mm., the improvement wherein said force-imparting wire is formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire having a preselected ratio of yield strength to modulus of elasticity ranging from a level comparable to that of stress relieved 18-8 stainless steel wire of the same cross section up to at least 80% greater than that of such stainless steel wire, whereby said wire is capable of applying a lower and more constant force magnitude with greater accuracy over a longer period thereby enhancing the effective working period of the appliance, said beta-titanium alloy wire having a higher maximum elastic deflection to yield than said stainless steel wire and an ability to withstand extensive bending into complex orthodontic configurations.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
159 words
In an orthodontic appliance having a force-imparting wire for applying corrective forces to a tooth, said wire having a cross section in the range of about 0.1 mm. to 2.0 mm., the improvement wherein said force-imparting wire is formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire having a preselected ratio of yield strength to modulus of elasticity ranging from a level comparable to that of stress relieved 18-8 stainless steel wire of the same cross section up to at least 80% greater than that of such stainless steel wire, whereby said wire is capable of applying a lower and more constant force magnitude with greater accuracy over a longer period thereby enhancing the effective working period of the appliance, said beta-titanium alloy wire having a higher maximum elastic deflection to yield than said stainless steel wire and an ability to withstand extensive bending into complex orthodontic configurations.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein said beta-titanium alloy has a modulus of elasticity in the range of 8-16×10 6 psi.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein said beta-titanium alloy contains a stabilizing amount of a metal selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, columbium, tantalum and vanadium.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein the deflection to yield of the beta-titanium alloy wire is at least about 50 percent greater than that of 18-8 stainless steel wire.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein said beta-titanium alloy is hardened by cold working.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein said beta-titanium alloy is a solution heat treated material that has been heat aged at a temperature above about 400° C.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein the alloy contains about 11.5 percent by weight molybdenum, 6 percent by weight zirconium and 4.5 percent by weight tin.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein the alloy contains about 13 percent by weight vanadium, 11 percent by weight chromium and 3 percent by weight aluminum.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
The orthodontic appliance of claim 1 wherein the alloy contains about 8 percent by weight molybdenum, 8 percent by weight vanadium, 2 percent by weight iron and 3 percent by weight aluminum.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
89 words
A highly ductile orthodontic ligature wire consisting essentially of wire having a cross section in the range of about 0.1 mm. to 2.0 mm. and formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire exhibiting a cold bending value as measured by ADA Specification No. 32 at least twice as great as that exhibited by a beta-titanium alloy wire of the same composition and cross section that has been heat aged for four hours at about 482° C.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
89 words
A highly ductile orthodontic ligature wire consisting essentially of wire having a cross section in the range of about 0.1 mm. to 2.0 mm. and formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire exhibiting a cold bending value as measured by ADA Specification No. 32 at least twice as great as that exhibited by a beta-titanium alloy wire of the same composition and cross section that has been heat aged for four hours at about 482° C.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
124 words
A retaining wire adapted for use in orthodontic clasps and retainers, prosthetic appliances, surgical jaw bars and the like consisting essentially of a wire formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire having a preselected ratio of yield strength to modulus of elasticity ranging from a level comparable to that of 18-8 stainless steel wire of the same cross section up to at least 80% greater than that of such stainless steel wire as well as an ability to withstand extensive bending, said wire being capable of applying lower force magnitudes during chewing and having a higher maximum elastic deflection to yield than said stainless steel wire so that retention is enhanced.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
124 words
A retaining wire adapted for use in orthodontic clasps and retainers, prosthetic appliances, surgical jaw bars and the like consisting essentially of a wire formed from a room temperature stabilized beta-titanium alloy having a modulus of elasticity well below 20×10 6 psi, said wire having a preselected ratio of yield strength to modulus of elasticity ranging from a level comparable to that of 18-8 stainless steel wire of the same cross section up to at least 80% greater than that of such stainless steel wire as well as an ability to withstand extensive bending, said wire being capable of applying lower force magnitudes during chewing and having a higher maximum elastic deflection to yield than said stainless steel wire so that retention is enhanced.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2798806A
Cited
US2798807A
Cited
US3052976A
Cited
US3351463A
Cited
US4094708A
Cited
US3748194A
Cited
US3767480A
Cited
US4037324A
Cited
US4067734A
Cited
US4098623A
Cited
US4055975A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-04-15 | 1983-10-15 | 1984-04-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-04-15 | 1987-10-15 | 1988-04-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-04-15 | 1991-10-15 | 1992-04-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |