US4195337A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Control method utilizing a model control scheme
Assignee: Bpifrance Financement SA
•
Filing: 1978-05-24
•
Granted: 1980-03-25
•
Expires: 1998-05-24
Abstract
Abstract A control method is described in which, a plant, a reference model and a corrector are serially connected in the loop. The plant output is fed back and compared against a reference signal to develop an error signal. The reference mode operates upon the error signal with a predetermined transfer function to develop signals proportional to the error signal and various successive order derivatives of the error signal. The model output signals are applied to a corrector circuit which multiplies the respective model output signals by appropriate coefficients, and sums the resultant product signals to produce control signals for the plant. Provisions are also disclosed for varying the coefficients to provide self-adaptive control. Provisions for accommodating process delays are also provided.
Inventors
- 👤 Pierre Bertrand
- 👤 Michel Jamet
- 👤 Jacques Strub
- 👤 Eric Walter
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 18:16
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
201 words
A system for controlling a process of the type including: a plant for effecting said process, said plant being responsive to a control signal applied thereto and generating a plant output signal in accordance with a predetermined transfer function; error signal generator means, responsive to said plant output signal and a reference signal applied thereto, for generating an error signal indicative of deviations of said plant output signal from said reference signal; and means, responsive to said error signal for generating said control signal to said plant, the improvement wherein: said means for generating said control signal comprises; model means, responsive to said error signal, for generating respective proportional, and successive order derivative output signals from said error signal in accordance with a predetermined model transfer function; corrector means, responsive to the respective model means output signals, for generating, in accordance with a transfer function inverse from the transfer function of said plant, said control signals, said inverse transfer function being of the form k 0 +k 1 p+k 2 p 2 + . . . k n p n , where p, p 2 . . . p n respresent the first, second . . . and nth derivative operators.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
201 words
A system for controlling a process of the type including: a plant for effecting said process, said plant being responsive to a control signal applied thereto and generating a plant output signal in accordance with a predetermined transfer function; error signal generator means, responsive to said plant output signal and a reference signal applied thereto, for generating an error signal indicative of deviations of said plant output signal from said reference signal; and means, responsive to said error signal for generating said control signal to said plant, the improvement wherein: said means for generating said control signal comprises; model means, responsive to said error signal, for generating respective proportional, and successive order derivative output signals from said error signal in accordance with a predetermined model transfer function; corrector means, responsive to the respective model means output signals, for generating, in accordance with a transfer function inverse from the transfer function of said plant, said control signals, said inverse transfer function being of the form k 0 +k 1 p+k 2 p 2 + . . . k n p n , where p, p 2 . . . p n respresent the first, second . . . and nth derivative operators.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
181 words
A method for controlling a process, said process being effected by a plant responsive to a control signal applied thereto and generating a plant output signal in accordance with a predetermined plant transfer function, said method comprising the steps of: generating an error signal from said plant output signal and a reference signal, said error signal being indicative of deviations from said plant output signal from said reference signal; generating from said error signal respective proportional and successive order derivative output signals in accordance with a predetermined model transfer function; and generating, in accordance with a second predetermined transfer function, inverse from said plant transfer function, said control signal from said aforementioned proportional and successive order derivative output signals, said control signals being of the form k 0 +k 1 p+k 2 p 2 + . . . k n p n , where p, p 2 . . . p n represents the first, second . . . and nth derivative output signals; and adjusting said predetermined model transfer function to define desired response time and overshoot for said plant.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
181 words
A method for controlling a process, said process being effected by a plant responsive to a control signal applied thereto and generating a plant output signal in accordance with a predetermined plant transfer function, said method comprising the steps of: generating an error signal from said plant output signal and a reference signal, said error signal being indicative of deviations from said plant output signal from said reference signal; generating from said error signal respective proportional and successive order derivative output signals in accordance with a predetermined model transfer function; and generating, in accordance with a second predetermined transfer function, inverse from said plant transfer function, said control signal from said aforementioned proportional and successive order derivative output signals, said control signals being of the form k 0 +k 1 p+k 2 p 2 + . . . k n p n , where p, p 2 . . . p n represents the first, second . . . and nth derivative output signals; and adjusting said predetermined model transfer function to define desired response time and overshoot for said plant.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said predetermined model transfer function m 0 of (p) is equal to ω 0 2 /p(p+2zω 0 ), where p represents the first derivative and ω 0 and z are adjustable parameters defining the desired response time and overshoot.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
35 words
The system of claim 1 further comprising a delay circuit responsive to said model means proportional output signal, and means for adding said delayed signal to said error signal for application to said model means.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 2 further comprising the step of delaying said proportional signal in accordance with 1-e - τp, and adding said delayed signal to said error signal.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
58 words
The method of claims 2 or 5 further comprising the steps of generating a second error signal indicative of deviations of said plant output signal from said model signal; and varying the coefficients k 0 , k 1 , k 2 . . . k n of said inverse transfer function in accordance with said second error signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 6 adapted for a process including a dead time, further including the step of delaying said proportional output signal in accordance with 1-e - τp ; and said adjusting of coefficient step includes applying said proportional and successive ordered derivative signals to respective delay circuits.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
A control method according to claim 7 further comprising the step of adapting the delay circuits through an auto-adaptative algorithm.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said corrector means comprises respective adjustable multipliers responsive to said proportional and successive order derivative output signals, and an adder receptive of the multiplier output signals, for generating said control signal.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
77 words
The system of claim 9 wherein said corrector means further comprises means for generating a second error signal indicative of the difference between said plant output signal and said model means output signals; respective second multipliers responsive to said second error signals and said model means output signals, for generating respective product signals; and respective integrators responsive to said respective product signals, for developing multiplication factor signals for application to said adjustable multipliers in said corrector means.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
76 words
The system of claim 10 adapted for a process including a dead time, further comprising: a first delay circuit responsive to said model means proportional output signal for delaying said proportional signal in accordance with 1-e - τ /p, said delayed signal being fed back as an input signal to said model means and second delay circuits responsive to said respective model means output signals, for providing respective delayed signals for application to said second multipliers.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
147 words
The system of claim 10 wherein said model means comprises: a first ω 0 multiplier, responsive to said error signals; an adder for summing output signals from said first ω 0 multiplier with a 2z feedback signal applied thereto; a second ω 0 multiplier, responsive to the output signal of said adder; a first integrator responsive to the output signal of said second ω 0 multiplier; an amplifier responsive to the output signal of said first integrator; a 2z-multiplier responsive to the output signals from said amplifier, for generating said 2z feedback signal to said adder; a second integrator responsive to said amplifier output signal; whereby said second integrator output signal generates said model means proportional output signal, said first integrator output signal provides said model means first order derivative signal and the output of said second multiplier provides said model means second order derivative output signal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
147 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said model means comprises: a first ω 0 multiplier, responsive to said error signals; an adder for summing output signals from said first ω 0 multiplier with a 2z feedback signal applied thereto; a second ω 0 multiplier, responsive to the output signal of said adder; a first integrator responsive to the output signal of said second ω 0 multiplier; an amplifier responsive to the output signal of said first integrator; a 2z-multiplier responsive to the output signals from said amplifier, for generating said 2z feedback signal to said adder; a second integrator responsive to said amplifier output signal; whereby said second integrator output signal generates said model means proportional output signal, said first integrator output signal provides said model means first order derivative signal and the output of said second multiplier provides said model means second order derivative output signal.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
141 words
The system of claim 13 wherein said corrector means comprises: first, second and third multipliers responsive to said model means proportional, first derivative, and second derivative output signals and to respective variable multiplier signals applied respectively thereto; means for summing the output signals of said first, second and third multipliers for generating said control signal to said plant; a subtractor responsive to said plant output signal and a signal indicative of said model means proportional output signal for generating a second error signal; fourth, fifth and sixth multipliers responsive to said second error signal and respectively responsive to signals indicative of said proportional, first derivative, and second derivative model means output signals; and respective integrators responsive to the respective output signals of said fourth, fifth and sixth multipliers for generating said variable multiplier signals to said first, second and third multipliers.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1983-03-25 | 1983-09-24 | 1984-03-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1987-03-25 | 1987-09-24 | 1988-03-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1991-03-25 | 1991-09-24 | 1992-03-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |