Patent US4181130A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4181130A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Drop discriminator system

Assignee: NEW IVAC Inc
•
Filing: 1977-11-04
•
Granted: 1980-01-01
•
Expires: 1997-11-04
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An electronic method and apparatus for evaluation of the quality of drop detection in apparatus for parenteral administration of medical fluids, wherein the waveforms of electrical signals representing drop flow detection are evaluated for conformity with both prescribed amplitude and time duration characteristics. Separate counters record the total number of drop events evaluated and the portion of the total which are determined to be non-conforming, and the latter counter triggers alarms if a predetermined limit is exceeded within a prescribed number of total events.

Inventors

  • 👤 Wilber H. Bailey

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-23 17:32
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61M; A61M5/00; A61M5/14; A61M5/168; A61M5/16886; A61M5/1689; G; G06; G06M; G06M1/00; G06M1/08; G06M1/10; G06M1/101; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S128/00; Y10S128/13

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 51
Claim 1
Independent Claim 167 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means, also responsive to said second means, for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said fourth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 167 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means, also responsive to said second means, for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said fourth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 32 words
A combination as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 35 words
A combination as set forth in claim 2, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals by comparing said amplitude with a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 28 words
A combination as set forth in claim 2, wherein said second means provides an indication of nonconformity in the amplitudes of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 34 words
A combination as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed time duration characteristics.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 38 words
A combination as set forth in claim 5, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals by comparing said time duration with a plurality of prescribed time duration frames.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 29 words
A combination as set forth in claim 5, wherein said second means provides an indication of nonconformity in the time durations of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 41 words
A combination as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating both the amplitude and the time duration of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude and time duration characteristics, respectively.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 51 words
A combination as set forth in claim 8, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude and the time duration of each of said electrical signals by comparing said amplitude and said time duration with a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels and a plurality of prescribed time durations, respectively.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 31 words
A combination as set forth in claim 8, wherein said second means provide an indication of nonconformity in the amplitudes and time durations of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 172 words
In a drop detection system for use with a fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means for qualitatively evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop flow events during a prescribed time frame to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics during said time frame, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said fourth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 172 words
In a drop detection system for use with a fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means for qualitatively evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop flow events during a prescribed time frame to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics during said time frame, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said fourth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 39 words
A combination as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals during a plurality of successive time frames to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 35 words
A combination as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals by comparing said amplitude with a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 39 words
A combination as set forth in claim 13, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals during a plurality of successive time frames to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 169 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means for qualitatively evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop flow events within a prescribed amplitude range to determine their conformity with prescribed time duration characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said forth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 169 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of drop flow activity; second means for receiving said electrical signals to determine the occurrence of individual drops; third means, responsive to said second means, for providing drop signals indicative of drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; fourth means for qualitatively evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop flow events within a prescribed amplitude range to determine their conformity with prescribed time duration characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; and fifth means, responsive to the electrical output of said forth means, for providing an indication of nonconformity in the waveform characteristics of a prescribed number of said electrical signals to determine proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 41 words
A combination as set forth in claim 15, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals within a plurality of prescribed amplitude ranges to determine their conformity with prescribed time duration characteristics.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 37 words
A combination as set forth in claim 15, wherein said fourth means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals by comparing said time duration with a plurality of prescribed time frames.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 193 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: sensing means for detecting drop flow activity; means responsive to said sensing means for generating electrical signals representative of the individual drops detected; means for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals to establish the occurrence of individual drop flow events, whereby individual drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from artifacts, and for providing drop signals indicative of individual drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; amplitude discrimination means for qualitatively evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; timing means for establishing a time frame during which the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations is evaluated by said amplitude discrimination means; and means responsive to qualitative evaluation of said drop flow events, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 193 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: sensing means for detecting drop flow activity; means responsive to said sensing means for generating electrical signals representative of the individual drops detected; means for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals to establish the occurrence of individual drop flow events, whereby individual drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from artifacts, and for providing drop signals indicative of individual drop flow events to the fluid flow control apparatus; amplitude discrimination means for qualitatively evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper drop flow events; timing means for establishing a time frame during which the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations is evaluated by said amplitude discrimination means; and means responsive to qualitative evaluation of said drop flow events, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 24 words
A combination as set forth in claim 18, and further including means for initiating said timing means in response to said amplitude discrimination means.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 39 words
A combination as set forth in claim 18 wherein said timing means includes means for establishing a plurality of successive time frames during which the amplitude of each of said electrical signals is evaluated by said amplitude discrimination means.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 30 words
A combination as set forth in claim 18, and further including: indicator means for providing an indication of non-conformity in the amplitudes of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 26
Independent Claim 82 words
A method for determining the quality of the detection of drop flow activity during the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, comprising the steps of: generating electrical signals in response to the detection of individual drops; and qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts.
Claim 27
Independent Claim 82 words
A method for determining the quality of the detection of drop flow activity during the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, comprising the steps of: generating electrical signals in response to the detection of individual drops; and qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 29 words
A method as set forth in claim 22, comprising the additional step of: indicating a lack of conformity in the waveforms of a predetermined number of said electrical signals.
Claim 29
Independent Claim 92 words
A method for evaluating the quality of the detection of drop flow activity during the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, comprising the steps of: generating electrical signals in response to the detection of individual drops; and qualitatively evaluating the amplitudes of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations during time frames of predetermined duration to determine the conformity of said electrical signals with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts.
Claim 30
Independent Claim 92 words
A method for evaluating the quality of the detection of drop flow activity during the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, comprising the steps of: generating electrical signals in response to the detection of individual drops; and qualitatively evaluating the amplitudes of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations during time frames of predetermined duration to determine the conformity of said electrical signals with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 30 words
A method as set forth in claim 24, and further including the step of: indicating a lack of conformity in the amplitudes of a predetermined number of said electrical signals.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 167 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: sensing means for detecting drop flow activity; means responsive to said sensing means for generating electrical signals representative of the individual drops detected; first discriminator means for qualitatively determining whether the amplitude of each of said electrical signals exceeds a first level, whereby the occurrence of an individual drop flow event is detected; second discriminator means for qualitatively determining whether the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing an individual drop configurations exceeds a second level greater than said first level; timing means responsive to said first discriminator means for establishing first and second successive time frames during which the amplitude of each of said electrical signals is compared with said second level; and means responsive to qualitative evaluation of said drop flow events, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 167 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: sensing means for detecting drop flow activity; means responsive to said sensing means for generating electrical signals representative of the individual drops detected; first discriminator means for qualitatively determining whether the amplitude of each of said electrical signals exceeds a first level, whereby the occurrence of an individual drop flow event is detected; second discriminator means for qualitatively determining whether the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing an individual drop configurations exceeds a second level greater than said first level; timing means responsive to said first discriminator means for establishing first and second successive time frames during which the amplitude of each of said electrical signals is compared with said second level; and means responsive to qualitative evaluation of said drop flow events, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 52 words
A combination as set forth in claim 26, and further including: indicator means for indicating whether the amplitude of each of said electrical signals representing an individual drop flow event does not exceed said second level during said first time frame or does exceed said second level during said second time frame.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 85 words
A combination as set forth in claim 26, and further including: first counting means for counting each electrical signal with an amplitude exceeding said first level, whereby a count of individual drop flow events is provided; and second counting means for counting each electrical signal counted by said first counting means and having an amplitude which also does not exceed said second level during said first time frame, whereby a count is provided of improper drop flow events as distinguished from proper drop flow events.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 48 words
A combination as set forth in claim 28, and further including: alarm means responsive to said first and second counting means for triggering an alarm when the ratio of the count in said first counting means to the count in said second counting means exceeds a prescribed level.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 34 words
A combination as set forth in claim 29, including means for resetting both said first counting means and said second counting means if the count in said first counting means exceeds a prescribed level.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 82 words
A combination as set forth in claim 26, further including: first counting means for counting each electrical signal with an amplitude exceeding said first level, whereby a count of individual drop flow events is provided; and second counting means for counting each electrical signal counted by said first counting means and having an amplitude which also exceeds said second level during said second time frame, whereby a count is provided of improper drop flow events as distinguished from proper drop flow events.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 47 words
A combination as set forth in claim 31, further including: alarm means responsive to said first and second counting means for triggering an alarm when the ratio of the count at said first counting means to the count at said second counting means exceeds a prescribed level.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 34 words
A combination as set forth in claim 32, including means for resetting both said first counting means and said second counting means if the count in said first counting means exceeds a prescribed level.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim 106 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of individual drops; second means for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts; and third means, responsive to the electrical output of said second means, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim 106 words
In a drop detection system for use with fluid flow control apparatus, in the parenteral administration of liquids through a feeding tube from a liquid source to a patient, the combination comprising: first means for generating electrical signals in response to detection of individual drops; second means for qualitatively evaluating the waveforms of each of said electrical signals representing individual drop configurations to determine their conformity with prescribed waveform characteristics, whereby proper drop flow events may be qualitatively distinguished from improper events and artifacts; and third means, responsive to the electrical output of said second means, for determining proper operation of the fluid flow control apparatus.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim 32 words
A combination as set forth in claim 34, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude characteristics.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim 35 words
A combination as set forth in claim 35, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating the amplitude of each of said electrical signals by comparing said amplitude with a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim 31 words
A combination as set forth in claim 35, wherein said second means includes means for providing an indication of non-conformity in the amplitudes of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim 34 words
A combination as set forth in claim 34, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed time duration characteristics.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim 38 words
A combination as set forth in claim 38, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating the time duration of each of said electrical signals by comparing said time duration with a plurality of prescribed time duration frames.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim 32 words
A combination as set forth in claim 38, wherein said second means includes means for providing an indicacion of non-conformity in the time durations of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim 41 words
A combination as set forth in claim 34, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating both the amplitude and the time duration of each of said electrical signals to determine their conformity with prescribed amplitude and time duration characteristics, respectively.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim 58 words
A combination as set forth in claim 41, wherein said second means includes means for evaluating the amplitude and the time duration of each of said electrical signals by comparing said amplitude and said time duration with a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels and a plurality of prescribed amplitude levels and a plurality of prescribed time durations, respectively.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim 34 words
A combination as set forth in claim 41, wherein said second means include means for providing an indication of non-conformity in the amplitudes and time durations of a prescribed number of said electrical signals.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3340386A Cited
US3618061A Cited
US3669540A Cited
US3890968A Cited
US3754220A Cited
US3867613A Cited
US3831039A Cited
US4000801A Cited
US3935876A Cited
US4075462A Cited
US4038982A Cited
US4114144A Cited
US4105028A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1982-12-31 1983-07-02 1984-01-01 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1986-12-31 1987-07-02 1988-01-01 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1990-12-31 1991-07-02 1992-01-01 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag