Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
126 words
A method for regulating the flow of vehicular traffic over a network of interconnected itineraries travelled by a plurality of vehicles which comprises: (a) defining at least one time-table for each vehicle over each itinerary to be travelled by said vehicle; (b) storing said time-table on board said vehicles; (c) assigning to each vehicle a time-table and a time-lag in coordination with the time-tables and time-lags assigned to other vehicles scheduled to travel over said network; on board each vehicle Hx, (d) continuously reckoning the location coordinates px of said vehicle Hx; (e) controlling the movement of vehicle Hx along said itinerary in function of the time of day and the coordinates px in order to meet its assigned time-table as modified by its assigned time-lag.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
126 words
A method for regulating the flow of vehicular traffic over a network of interconnected itineraries travelled by a plurality of vehicles which comprises: (a) defining at least one time-table for each vehicle over each itinerary to be travelled by said vehicle; (b) storing said time-table on board said vehicles; (c) assigning to each vehicle a time-table and a time-lag in coordination with the time-tables and time-lags assigned to other vehicles scheduled to travel over said network; on board each vehicle Hx, (d) continuously reckoning the location coordinates px of said vehicle Hx; (e) controlling the movement of vehicle Hx along said itinerary in function of the time of day and the coordinates px in order to meet its assigned time-table as modified by its assigned time-lag.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
106 words
The method claimed in 1 wherein step 1b comprises: (a) storing on board said vehicle an assigned time-table comprising location coordinates defining a plurality of sequential points along said itinerary in correlation which the time required for said vehicle to reach said points; and Step (1d) comprises: (b) measuring the distance travelled by said vehicle through a plurality of independent means; (c) accumulating said travelled distances in a register by periodical increments selected from said means whereby a particular means is selected as a source of periodical increment only during such phase of the vehicle movement when said means is expected to be the most accurate.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
86 words
The method claimed in 2 which further comprises: (a) storing on board said vehicle the premeasured location coordinates of a plurality of events which can be detected by said vehicle along its itinerary; (b) detecting the encounter of said events along the itinerary and upon detection of each of said events, update the contents of said register by an amount derived from a continuous non-linear function of the difference between the current distance accumulated in said register and the stored coordinates of the events being detected;
Claim 5
Independent Claim
48 words
The method claimed in 3 wherein said events comprise: means specifically installed along said itinerary as indicators of position; and recurring and immutable physical phenomena detectable along the itinerary, wherein the locations of occurrence coordinates of said events have been recorded during an experimental run over said itinerary.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
156 words
The method claimed in 4 which further comprises: (a) recording in a memory during said experimental run, an identification code for each said event in coordination with its location of occurrence coordinates; (b) reading at least one of said events identification code during subsequent scheduled runs from said memory according to an address margin determined in function of the estimated location coordinates held in said register combined with statistical factors which are modified in function of the current estimated accuracy of the coordinates held in said register; (c) comparing the identification code of the event being detected with the identification code being read out from the memory; (d) upon detecting similarity between said identification codes, generating a correction factor to be applied to the contents of said register where said correction factor is a continuous non-linear function of the difference between the coordinates stored in the register and the prerecorded location coordinates of the detected event.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
36 words
The method claimed in 1 wherein step 1e comprises: (a) computing the time error between the time derived from a clock and the time at which the vehicle should pass the location defined in step 1d.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
108 words
The method claimed in 6 wherein step 1e further comprises: (a) storing periodically on board said vehicle the instantaneous acceleration or deceleration commands applied to said vehicle during an experimental run over said itinerary in correlation with its location and in correlation with the time at which said commands were recorded; and during subsequent scheduled runs; (b) extracting from storage said commands in function of the location coordinates derived from said register, and said commands in function of the time derived from a clock; (c) computing an acceleration or deceleration command in function of said time error; (d) applying a combination of said various commands to the vehicle.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method claimed in claim 2 wherein step 2b comprises: measuring said distance by means of at least one accelerometer, the output of which is twice integrated, and by means of at least one wheel revolutions counter, wherein the accelerometer generated data are given more weight during periods of acceleration and deceleration and the revolutions counter data are given more weight during periods of constant speed or minor acceleration and deceleration.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
48 words
The method claimed in 8 which further comprises: modifying the wheel circumference factor used to calculate the distance travelled from the wheel revolution counters data, by a correction factor adjusted periodically in function of the error between said data and measurement derived from at least one other means.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
130 words
The method claimed in claim 1 wherein step 1c comprises: (a) examining each combination of two said time-tables, TTi and TTj for possible interference and defining for each said combination up to four parameters, ai, aj, bij and bji, whereby when a first vehicle Hi, which has been assigned a time-table TTi and a time-lag TLi, is to use the same path as, and follow a second vehicle Hj, which has been assigned a time-table TTj and a time-lag TLj, TLi≧TLj+aj·lj+bij, wherein lj is the length of vehicle Hj, and when vehicle Hi is to precede vehicle Hj over said path, TLj≧TLi+ai·li+bji, wherein li is the length of vehicle Hi; (b) negotiating between the vehicles crews and a traffic control center, by radio communication, changes of time-tables or time-lags. 0000