Patent US4125799A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4125799A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Gyro caging loop system

Assignee: McDonnell Douglas Corp
•
Filing: 1977-07-29
•
Granted: 1978-11-14
•
Expires: 1997-07-29
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A system for providing a stable caging loop for two-degree-of-freedom dry tuned gyros used in a strap-down inertial navigation system. The system provides satisfactory noise rejection and good navigation accuracy using cross axis torquing only with extremely simple analog shaping circuits in place of the combination of cross axis and direct axis torquing with complex shaping circuitry that is normally required with these gyros in such an application. A 64 Hz bandwidth loop is provided with less than 1 DEG phase lag below 5 Hz, 10 db attenuation of rotor spin rate noise, and at least 35 db attenuation of all higher frequencies. Its performance is such that it can be used in a navigation system requiring accuracy on the order of one nautical mile per hour in a typical missile environment.

Inventors

  • 👤 John T. Harduvel

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 23:03
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01C; G01C19/00; G01C19/02; G01C19/04; G01C19/30; G01C19/26; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T74/00; Y10T74/12; Y10T74/1229

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim 163 words
A caging loop system for a gyro having two orthogonal axes, the caging loop system having a cross feed shaping network without any direct feed network, comprising: demodulator means; means for applying gyro pickoff signals to the demodulator means; circuit means coupled to the demodulator means and having an output for applying signals to drive to gyro, the circuit means including an integrator; a predetermined lead-lag network intercoupled with the integrator to develop a complex zero and a complex pole at preselected frequencies, the frequency of the complex zero being lower than the frequency of the complex pole; and a complex second-order lag network coupled to the output of the integrator and providing a pair of complex zeros and a pair of complex poles at selected frequencies determined in accordance with the nutation resonance frequency of the gyro, the complex poles being at a frequency below said nutation resonance frequency and the complex zeros being at a frequency above said nutation resonance frequency.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 163 words
A caging loop system for a gyro having two orthogonal axes, the caging loop system having a cross feed shaping network without any direct feed network, comprising: demodulator means; means for applying gyro pickoff signals to the demodulator means; circuit means coupled to the demodulator means and having an output for applying signals to drive to gyro, the circuit means including an integrator; a predetermined lead-lag network intercoupled with the integrator to develop a complex zero and a complex pole at preselected frequencies, the frequency of the complex zero being lower than the frequency of the complex pole; and a complex second-order lag network coupled to the output of the integrator and providing a pair of complex zeros and a pair of complex poles at selected frequencies determined in accordance with the nutation resonance frequency of the gyro, the complex poles being at a frequency below said nutation resonance frequency and the complex zeros being at a frequency above said nutation resonance frequency.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 28 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the frequency of said pair of complex zeros is between the nutation resonance frequency and twice the spin speed of the gyro.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 29 words
The system of claim 1 wherein said circuit means is a cross feed shaping network having a Laplace transfer function (F c ) corresponding to the following equation: ##EQU3##
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system of claim 1 further including a caging switch coupled in series between the demodulating means and the circuit means.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 70 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the demodulator means comprises first and second demodulators coupled to first and second gyro axes and wherein the circuit means constitutes a first cross feed network coupled between the first demodulator and the second gyro axis and further including a second cross feed network identical to the first cross feed network and coupled between the second demodulator and the first axis of the gyro.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 52 words
The system of claim 1 wherein the second-order lag network comprises a plurality of resistors and a plurality of capacitors intercoupled in a circuit arrangement and selected to produce a phase lag of approximately 180° at the nutation resonance frequency of the gyro to develop phase stability at said nutation resonance frequency.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 83 words
A signal shaping circuit comprising: an integrator having an amplifier for receiving signals at an input thereof; and a feedback loop including a first capacitor in series with a parallel combination of a resistor and a second capacitor, said resistor and said first and second capacitors constituting a lead-lag network and having values such that the network develops, with said amplifier, a Laplace transform function having a complex pole and a complex zero, the zero being at a lower frequency than the pole.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 83 words
A signal shaping circuit comprising: an integrator having an amplifier for receiving signals at an input thereof; and a feedback loop including a first capacitor in series with a parallel combination of a resistor and a second capacitor, said resistor and said first and second capacitors constituting a lead-lag network and having values such that the network develops, with said amplifier, a Laplace transform function having a complex pole and a complex zero, the zero being at a lower frequency than the pole.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The circuit of claim 7 wherein said zero is at approximately 15.8 Hz and said pole is at approximately 108.9 Hz.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 75 words
The circuit of claim 7 further comprising additional resistors and capacitors interconnected in a complex lag network coupled to the integrator output for further shaping signals received by the amplifier, the additional resistors and capacitors being of values such that the lag network develops a second order Laplace transfer function having a pair of complex zeros and a pair of complex poles, the zeros being at a frequency greater than the frequency of the poles.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 46 words
The circuit of claim 9 wherein the circuit is associated with a device having a fixed nutation resonance frequency, and wherein the frequencies of the complex zeros and complex poles of the second order Laplace transfer function fall on opposite sides of the nutation resonance frequency.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 20 words
The circuit of claim 9 wherein the Laplace transfer function (F c ) thereof corresponds to the following equation: ##EQU4##
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 33 words
The circuit of claim 11 wherein the second order complex zeros are at a frequency of approximately 185 Hz and the second order complex poles are at a frequency of approximately 150 Hz.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 25 words
The circuit of claim 12 wherein the complex zeros damping factor is equal to 0.01 and the complex poles damping factor is equal to 0.35.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 33 words
The circuit of claim 9 wherein the values of the circuit components are such as to satisfy the Nyquist theory stability criterion over a frequency range of at least 10 to 200 Hz.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3227935A Cited
US3398341A Cited
US3986092A Cited
US3808486A Cited
US4052654A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1981-11-13 1982-05-15 1982-11-14 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1985-11-13 1986-05-15 1986-11-14 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1989-11-13 1990-05-15 1990-11-14 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag