Patent US4117524A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4117524A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Current-limiting devices
Assignee: Rolls Royce Power Engineering PLC
•
Filing: 1976-10-01
•
Granted: 1978-09-26
•
Expires: 1996-10-01
Abstract
Abstract A current-limiting device for an alternating current system has for each phase a pair of saturable reactors each with an iron core, an alternating current winding and a superconducting direct current bias winding which is common to the reactor cores and biases them both to saturation. The two alternating current windings in each phase are connected in series opposition such that under fault conditions they are driven out of saturation on alternate half-cycles and thus limit the overload current. The superconducting winding has a surrounding magnetic flux screen which also forms a loop for shunting alternating current under fault conditions and which may be used as a direct current control circuit for varying the bias level. The screen serves as the outer vessel of an evacuated enclosure for the superconducting winding and a suppot system for the inner vessel is also described.
Inventors
- 👤 Kenneth Charles Parton
- 👤 Anthony Derek Appleton
- 👤 Trevor Carlisle Bartram
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 15:09
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01F; H01F6/00; G; G05; G05F; G05F3/00; G05F3/02; G05F3/04; G05F3/06; H01F29/00; H01F29/14; H01F29/143; H02; H02H; H02H9/00; H02H9/02; H01F2006/001; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E40/00; Y02E40/60; Y10; Y10S; Y10S336/00; Y10S336/01; Y10S505/00; Y10S505/825; Y10S505/85
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
161 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor having an alternating current winding and a direct current superconducting bias winding, the bias winding being common to the reactors of that phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated under full load alternating current conditions, said bias winding having a surrounding screen of electrically-conductive material shielding the direct current bias winding against alternating magnetic flux, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
161 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor having an alternating current winding and a direct current superconducting bias winding, the bias winding being common to the reactors of that phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated under full load alternating current conditions, said bias winding having a surrounding screen of electrically-conductive material shielding the direct current bias winding against alternating magnetic flux, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 1 having at least one air-gap magnetic core linked by the bias winding.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
35 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said screen provides a closed loop for the circulation of alternating current which is electrically independent of but physically in parallel with the superconducting bias winding.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said screen forms part of a direct current control circuit for varying the bias level of said reactor cores.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
163 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor comprising an iron core, an alternating current winding on said core, a direct current superconducting bias winding and an auxiliary direct current bias winding of normal conductivity material linking said core, said bias windings being common to the reactors of that phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
163 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor comprising an iron core, an alternating current winding on said core, a direct current superconducting bias winding and an auxiliary direct current bias winding of normal conductivity material linking said core, said bias windings being common to the reactors of that phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 5 wherein said auxiliary direct current bias winding is in the form of a magnetic flux screen surrounding said superconducting winding.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
23 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 1 wherein said screen forms the outer vessel of a vacuum enclosure surrounding said superconducting winding.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
31 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 7 in which said evacuated enclosure has an inner vessel surrounding said superconducting winding and means suspending said inner vessel within said outer vessel.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
36 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 8 in which said suspension means comprise tensioned ropes following a zig-zag path in a vertical plane between said inner and outer vessels above and below the inner vessel.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 9 in which the superconducting winding and the screen form a loop disposed in a horizontal plane.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
177 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two saturable reactors, each reactor comprising an iron core, an alternating-current winding on said core, a superconducting direct current bias winding linking said core, and an alternating current shunt winding linking said core, said shunt winding being a loop disposed in parallel with but electrically independent of said bias winding, said bias winding being common to the reactors of the said phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
177 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two saturable reactors, each reactor comprising an iron core, an alternating-current winding on said core, a superconducting direct current bias winding linking said core, and an alternating current shunt winding linking said core, said shunt winding being a loop disposed in parallel with but electrically independent of said bias winding, said bias winding being common to the reactors of the said phase and establishing a bias level of saturation in the reactor cores such that the reactor cores are maintained saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, and the alternating current windings of each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
34 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 11 comprising a controllable direct-current source connected to said shunt winding to supply current to said shunt winding and thereby vary the flux in the reactor cores.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
169 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system a pair of saturable reactors, each reactor having an iron core, an alternating current winding on the core, and a superconducting direct current bias winding linking the core, the bias winding being common to the reactor cores of that phase and capable of maintaining the cores saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, an electrically-conducting screen enclosing said bias winding to shield the bias winding against alternating magnetic flux, said screen forming a circuit electrically separate from but physically parallel to said bias winding, and the alternating current windings of said pair of reactors being connected in series opposition with respect to the bias winding whereby under full load conditions an increase in the saturation level in one core is compensated by a decrease in the saturation level in the other core whereas under fault conditions current is limited as the cores are alternately forced out of saturation on successive half-cycles.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
169 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system a pair of saturable reactors, each reactor having an iron core, an alternating current winding on the core, and a superconducting direct current bias winding linking the core, the bias winding being common to the reactor cores of that phase and capable of maintaining the cores saturated when the alternating current windings are under full load, an electrically-conducting screen enclosing said bias winding to shield the bias winding against alternating magnetic flux, said screen forming a circuit electrically separate from but physically parallel to said bias winding, and the alternating current windings of said pair of reactors being connected in series opposition with respect to the bias winding whereby under full load conditions an increase in the saturation level in one core is compensated by a decrease in the saturation level in the other core whereas under fault conditions current is limited as the cores are alternately forced out of saturation on successive half-cycles.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1981-09-25 | 1982-03-27 | 1982-09-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1985-09-25 | 1986-03-27 | 1986-09-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1989-09-25 | 1990-03-27 | 1990-09-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |