Patent US4101392A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4101392A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Process for electrolytic oxidative methyl-methyl coupling of cresol salts

Assignee: Monsanto Co
•
Filing: 1976-12-22
•
Granted: 1978-07-18
•
Expires: 1996-12-22
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Cresol salts substituted with non-interfering, blocking substituents at least at the 2,4,6-positions relative to the phenolic oxyanion where at least one of the substituents is the cresolic methyl are electrolytically oxidized to yield methyl-methyl coupled dehydrodimeric cresols.

Inventors

  • 👤 Richard C. Hallcher
  • 👤 Manuel M. Baizer

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 13:59
CPC Classifications
C; C25; C25B; C25B3/00; C25B3/20; C25B3/29; C25B3/01; C25B3/07

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim 117 words
An improved process for electrolytic oxidative methyl-methyl coupling of cresol salts substituted with non-interfering, blocking substituents at least at the 2, 4, 6-positions relative to the phenolic oxyanion where at least one of the substituents is the cresolic methyl, which process comprises electrolytic oxidation at the anode by electrolysis at no more than about 0.5 volts (versus the saturated calomel electrode) in a liquid electrolysis medium comprising the cresol salt, the corresponding free cresol, and a substantially non-nucleophilic solvent, wherein the molar equivalent ratio of cresol salt to free cresol is no more than about 1.0 molar equivalent of cresol salt to about 5.0 molar equivalents of free cresol, and thereafter recovering a methyl-methyl coupled dehydrodimeric cresol.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 117 words
An improved process for electrolytic oxidative methyl-methyl coupling of cresol salts substituted with non-interfering, blocking substituents at least at the 2, 4, 6-positions relative to the phenolic oxyanion where at least one of the substituents is the cresolic methyl, which process comprises electrolytic oxidation at the anode by electrolysis at no more than about 0.5 volts (versus the saturated calomel electrode) in a liquid electrolysis medium comprising the cresol salt, the corresponding free cresol, and a substantially non-nucleophilic solvent, wherein the molar equivalent ratio of cresol salt to free cresol is no more than about 1.0 molar equivalent of cresol salt to about 5.0 molar equivalents of free cresol, and thereafter recovering a methyl-methyl coupled dehydrodimeric cresol.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the cresol salt is a 2,4,6-trialkylphenol salt.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 2 wherein the 2,4,6-trialkylphenol salt is a 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol salt.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 2 wherein the 2,4,6-trialkylphenol salt is a 2,4,6-trimethylphenol salt.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the cresol salt is a Group 1a metal or tetraalkylphenoxide and the methyl-methyl coupled dehydrodimeric cresol is a 1,2-bis(3,5-dialkyl-hydroxyphenyl)ethane.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 5 wherein the Group 1a or tetraalkylammonium 2,4,6-trialkylphenoxide is sodium 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenoxide and the 1,2-bis(3,5-dialkyl-hydroxyphenyl)ethane is 1,2-bis(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 5 wherein the Group 1a or tetraalkylammonium 2,4,6-trialkylphenoxide is sodium 2,4,6-trimethylphenoxide and the 1,2-bis(3,5-dialkyl-hydroxyphenyl)ethane is 1,2-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethane.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 5 wherein the Group 1a or tetralkylammonium 2,4,6-trialkylphenoxide is tetra-n-butylammonium 2,4,6-trimethylphenoxide and the 1,2-bis(3,5-dialkyl-hydroxyphenyl)ethane is 1,2-bis(2-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)ethane.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the electrolysis medium is basic.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is substantially anhydrous.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 10 wherein the substantially anhydrous solvent is acetonitrile.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent contains small amounts of added water.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process of claim 12 wherein the solvent containing small amounts of added water is acetonitrile.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 21 words
The process of claim 12 wherein the concentration of the small amounts of added water is about 10 percent by volume.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 11 words
The process of claim 1 wherein a supporting electrolyte is used.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 23 words
The process of claim 15 wherein the concentration of the supporting electrolyte is between about 1.0 percent and about 15 percent by weight.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of claim 15 wherein the supporting electrolyte is a quaternary ammonium salt.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 17 wherein the quaternary ammonium salt is tetraethylammonium perchlorate.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 17 words
The process of claim 1 wherein a graphite felt anode and a platinum screen cathode are used.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 38 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the molar equivalent ratio of cresol salt to the corresponding free cresol is between about 1.0 molar equivalent of cresol salt to between about 10 and 25 molar equivalents of free cresol.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 48 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of cresol salt in the electrolysis medium is between about 1.0 percent and about 15 percent by weight; the anode potential is sufficient to effect oxidative methyl-methyl coupling of the cresol salt; and the electrolysis is conducted at ambient temperatures.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3756928A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1981-07-17 1982-01-16 1982-07-18 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1985-07-17 1986-01-16 1986-07-18 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1989-07-17 1990-01-16 1990-07-18 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag