← Back to Patent Explorer
US4080191A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Aquatic pesticidal compositions and method

Assignee: Sandoz AG
•
Filing: 1973-06-29
•
Granted: 1978-03-21
•
Expires: 1993-06-29
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The present invention concerns a pesticidal formulation which comprises, in admixture, a pesticidal agent, an anionic or non-ionic surfactant and a water-immiscible solvent/diluent, the formulation being adapted to form a slick on a water surface. The formulation is useful in combating pests on or directly beneath water.

Inventors

  • 👤 John Charles Harvey

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-04 19:06
CPC Classifications
A; A01; A01N; A01N39/00; A01N39/02; A01N39/04; A01N25/00; A01N25/02; A01N43/00; A01N43/48; A01N43/58; A01N57/00; A01N57/10; A01N57/16

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 56
Claim 1
Independent Claim 122 words
A pesticidal "slick" formulation comprising: (a) 5 to 60% by weight of a pesticidal agent, (b) 0.2 to 4% by weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant and mixtures thereof, said surfactant havig an HLB value of less than 12.5, and (c) a water-immiscible solvent/diluent selected from the group consisting of a water-immiscible solvent, a water-immiscible solvent with one or more water-immiscible diluents and mixtures thereof, said water-immiscible solvent/diluent having a mean specific gravity of less than 1 and being present in an amount to make up the balance to 100% by weight; the proportions of said constituents (a), (b) and (c) being such that said formulation has a positive spreading co-efficient value.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 122 words
A pesticidal "slick" formulation comprising: (a) 5 to 60% by weight of a pesticidal agent, (b) 0.2 to 4% by weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant and mixtures thereof, said surfactant havig an HLB value of less than 12.5, and (c) a water-immiscible solvent/diluent selected from the group consisting of a water-immiscible solvent, a water-immiscible solvent with one or more water-immiscible diluents and mixtures thereof, said water-immiscible solvent/diluent having a mean specific gravity of less than 1 and being present in an amount to make up the balance to 100% by weight; the proportions of said constituents (a), (b) and (c) being such that said formulation has a positive spreading co-efficient value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 13 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the pesticidal agent is an insecticidal agent.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 12 words
The formulation of claim 2, wherein the insecticidal agent is an organophosphate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 18 words
The formulation of claim 3, wherein the organophosphate is selected from the group consisting of O,O-dimethyl-O-[quinoxalkyl-(2)]-thionophosphate and O,O-diethyl-O-[quinoxalyl-(2)]-thionophsophate.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 13 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the pesticidal agent is a herbicidal agent.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 24 words
The formulation of claim 5, wherein the herbicidal agent is selected from the group consisting of a pyradazinone and a phenoxy aliphatic acid derivative.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 20 words
The formulation of claim 6, wherein the pyradazinone is (4-chloro-5-dimethylamino)-2,α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone and the phenoxy aliphatic acid derivative is 2-methyl-4-chloro-phenoxy iso-octyl acetate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 173 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: a. a propylene oxide/ethylene-diamine/ethylene-oxide copolymer having an HLB value of 7.0, b. a sorbitol monolaurate having an HLB value of 8.6, c. an alkylaryl polyether-ethanol hving an HLB value of 9.1, d. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol monostearate having an HLB value of 9.6, e. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol oleate laurate having an HLB value of 10.0, f. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate having an HLB value 10.2, g. a nonylphenylpolyethylene glycol ether having an HLB value of 10.9, h. a condensate of ethylene oxide with a hydrophobic precondensate formed by condensing propylene oxide with propylene glycol, having an HLB value of either 11.0 or 12.0, i. a polyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate having an HLB value of 11.4, j. a polyethylene ether having an HLB value of less than 12.5, k. a polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and l. a blend polyoxyethylene ether or fatty acid ester/alkylaryl sulphonate having an HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 59 words
The formulation of claim 8, wherein the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of a polyoxyethylene ether having an HLB value of less then 12.5, a polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and a blend polyoxyethylene ether or polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester/alkylaryl sulphonate having a mean HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 24 words
The formulation of claim 9, wherein the surfactant is a blend of polyoxyethylene ether/alkylaryl sulphonate having a mean HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 18 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the solvent/diluent consists of a mixture of a solvent and a diluent.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 14 words
The formulation of claim 11, wherein the solvent comprises an aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 25 words
The formulation of claim 12, wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction has a boiling range of 130°-220° C, 161°-182° C, 187°-213° C or 203°-267° C.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 17 words
The formulation of claim 12, wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is a high boiling aromatic naphtha.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 16 words
The formulation of claim 12, wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is xylene, toluene or methyl-naphthalene.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 13 words
The formulation of claim 11, wherein the solvent is a liquid, water-immiscible phenol.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 13 words
The formulation of claim 16, wherein the phenol is technical grade nonyl phenol.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 15 words
The formulation of claim 11, wherein the solvent itself comprises a mixture of separate constituents.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 19 words
The formulation of claim 18, wherein the solvent consists of a mixture of xylene and nonyl phenol (technical grade).
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 14 words
The formulation of claim 11, wherein the diluent comprises an aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 25 words
The formulation of claim 20, wherein the aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction has a boiling range of 175° to 288° C or 140° to 200° C.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 22 words
The formulation of claim 21, wherein the aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is kerosene having a boiling range of 175° to 288° C.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 18 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the solvent/diluent consists of a solvent which also serves as a diluent.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 13 words
The formulation of claim 23, wherein the solvent is a mixture of solvents.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 23 words
The formulation of claim 1, wherein the proportion of each constituent is arranged to provide a spreading co-efficient of at least +5 dyn/cm.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 19 words
The formulation of claim 25, wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of from +5 to +30 dyn/cm.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 19 words
The formulation of claim 26, wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of from +10 to +30 dyn/cm.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 19 words
The formulation of claim 27, wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of from +20 to +30 dyn/cm.
Claim 30
Independent Claim 156 words
The method of combating pests on or in a water locus comprising applying to the surface of the water locus a pesticidal formulation comprising: (a) 5 to 60% by weight of a pesticidal agent, (b) 0.2 to 4% by weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant and mixtures thereof, said surfactant having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and (c) a water-immiscible solvent/diluent selected from the group consisting of a water-immiscible solvent, a water-immiscible solvent with one or more water-immiscible diluents and mixtures thereof, said water-immiscible solvent/diluent having a mean specific gravity of less than 1 and being present in an amount to make up the balance to 100% by weight; the proportions of said constituents (a), (b) and (c) being such that said formulation has a positive spreading co-efficient value, whereby said formulation distributes itself over water surface areas not covered by such initial application.
Claim 31
Independent Claim 156 words
The method of combating pests on or in a water locus comprising applying to the surface of the water locus a pesticidal formulation comprising: (a) 5 to 60% by weight of a pesticidal agent, (b) 0.2 to 4% by weight of a surfactant selected from the group consisting of an anionic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant and mixtures thereof, said surfactant having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and (c) a water-immiscible solvent/diluent selected from the group consisting of a water-immiscible solvent, a water-immiscible solvent with one or more water-immiscible diluents and mixtures thereof, said water-immiscible solvent/diluent having a mean specific gravity of less than 1 and being present in an amount to make up the balance to 100% by weight; the proportions of said constituents (a), (b) and (c) being such that said formulation has a positive spreading co-efficient value, whereby said formulation distributes itself over water surface areas not covered by such initial application.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of plus 10 to plus 30 dyn/cm.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 175 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of: a. a propylene oxide/ethylene-diamine ethylene-oxide copolymer having an HLB value of 7.0, b. a sorbitol monolaurate having an HLB value of 8.6, c. an alkylaryl polyether-ethanol having an HLB value of 9.1, d. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol monostearate having an HLB value of 9.6, e. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol oleate laurate having an HLB value of 10.0, f. a polyoxyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate having an HLB value of 10.2, g. a nonylphenylpolyethylene glycol ether having an HLB value of 10.9, h. a condensate of ethylene oxide with a hydrophobic precondensate formed by condensing propylene oxide with propylene glycol, having an HLB value of either 11.0 or 12.0, i. a polyethylene sorbitol hexaoleate having an HLB value of 11.4, j. a polyethylene ether having an HLB value of less than 12.5, k. a polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and l. a blend polyoxyethylene ether or fatty acid ester/alkylaryl sulphonate having an HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 59 words
The method of claim 31 wherein the surfactant is selected from the group consisting of a polyoxyethylene ether having an HLB value of less than 12.5, a polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester having an HLB value of less than 12.5, and a blend polyoxyethylene ether or polyoxyethylene fatty acid ester/alkylaryl sulphonate having a mean HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 32 wherein the surfactant is a blend polyoxyethylene ether/alkylaryl sulphonate having a mean HLB value of less than 12.5.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the solvent/diluent consists of a mixture of a solvent and a diluent.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 34 wherein the solvent comprises an aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 35 wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction has a boiling range of 130°-220° C, 151°-182° C, 187°-213° C or 203°-267° C.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 35 wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is a high boiling aromatic naphtha.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method of claim 35 wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is xylene, toluene or methyl-naphthalene.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 34 wherein the solvent is a liquid, water-immiscible phenol.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 39 wherein the phenol is technical grade nonyl phenol.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 34 wherein the solvent itself comprises a mixture of separate constituents.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 41 wherein the solvent consists of a mixture of xylene and nonyl phenol (technical grade).
Claim 45
Dependent Claim 14 words
The method of claim 34 wherein the diluent comprises an aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 43 wherein the aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction has a boiling range of 175° to 288° C or 140° to 200° C.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 44 wherein the aliphatic hydrocarbon petroleum fraction is kerosene having a boiling range of 175° to 288° C.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the solvent/diluent consists of a solvent which also serves as a diluent.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 46 wherein the solvent is a mixture of solvents.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim 23 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the proportion of each constituent is arranged to provide a spreading co-efficient of at least +5 dyn/cm.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 48 wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of from +5 to +30 dyn/cm.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 30 wherein the spreading co-efficient is in the range of from +20 to +30 dyn/cm.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim 13 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the pesticidal agent is an insecticidal agent.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim 19 words
The method of claim 51 wherein the pesticidal agent is selected from the group consisting of O,O-dimethyl-O-[quinoxalyl-(2)]-thionophosphate and O,O-diethyl-O-[quinoxalyl-(2)]-thionophosphate.
Claim 55
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of claim 29 wherein the pesticidal agent is a herbicidal agent selected from the group consisting of a pyradazinone and a phenoxy aliphatic acid derivative.
Claim 56
Dependent Claim 20 words
The method of claim 53 wherein the pyradazinone is (4-chloro-5-dimethylamino-2,α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone and the phenoxy aliphatic acid derivative is 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxy iso-octyl acetate.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3810980A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1981-03-20 1981-09-19 1982-03-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1985-03-20 1985-09-19 1986-03-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1989-03-20 1989-09-19 1990-03-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag