US4069471A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of determining weathering corrections in seismic record processing
Assignee: Geophysical Systems Corp
•
Filing: 1976-03-12
•
Granted: 1978-01-17
•
Expires: 1996-03-12
Abstract
Abstract The method of determining the magnitude of the differential static correction between two selected adjacent receiver points D, E, in a linear seismic array, that involves the steps of: recording a first multi-trace record responsive to a first seismic wave generated at a first source point C on one side of D, E at any distance; recording a second corresponding multi-trace record responsive to a second seismic wave at a second source point F on the opposite side of D, E at any distance; correlating a first trace CE with a second trace CD of the first record to obtain a first time difference R; correlating the corresponding first trace FD with a second trace FE of the second record to get a second time difference S; and determining the value of K = (R - S)/2, where K is a value of the static correction equal to the difference in the travel time through the weathered layer at D and E. The process can be repeated for other positions of C, F to obtain other independent values of K. The various values of K can be averaged to provide an improved value of differential static correction at receiver points D, E. The method is applicable also to determining the differential static correction at two adjacent source points.
Inventors
- 👤 Daniel Silverman
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 22:29
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/36; G01V1/362; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/50; G01V2210/53
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
158 words
In a seismic system having a linear array of receiver positions, A, B, C, and F, G, H, etc. and closely-spaced source positions D, E, therebetween, the method of determining the differential static correction through the weathered layer at source positions D and E, comprising the steps of: a. recording a first record from source point D to receivers C, upline, and F, downline, from source D. b. recording a second record from source point E to receivers C, up line, and F, downline, from source E; c. correlating a first pair of traces DF and EF to provide a first time difference R between said first two traces; d. correlating a second pair of traces EC and DC to provide a second time difference S between said second pair of traces; and e. determining K 1 = (R - S)/2, where K 1 is the first value of differential static correction at source points D and E.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
158 words
In a seismic system having a linear array of receiver positions, A, B, C, and F, G, H, etc. and closely-spaced source positions D, E, therebetween, the method of determining the differential static correction through the weathered layer at source positions D and E, comprising the steps of: a. recording a first record from source point D to receivers C, upline, and F, downline, from source D. b. recording a second record from source point E to receivers C, up line, and F, downline, from source E; c. correlating a first pair of traces DF and EF to provide a first time difference R between said first two traces; d. correlating a second pair of traces EC and DC to provide a second time difference S between said second pair of traces; and e. determining K 1 = (R - S)/2, where K 1 is the first value of differential static correction at source points D and E.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method as in claim 1 including repeating steps (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) for other positions of receivers C and F, such as B and G, respectively; f. determining a second value of K 2 = (R - S)/2 for receiver points B and G, and g. determining the average value K A of K 1 and K 2 .
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as in claim 2 including the step of applying the determined correction K A to one of said first and second records with respect to the other.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method as in claim 1 including the steps of h. repeating steps (a) and (b) for a new position of F such as G; i. repeating step (c) to obtain a new value of R G of R; j. repeating step (e) using the value of R G and the previous value S to provide a value K 3 = (R G - S)/2; and k. determining the average value K A of K 3 and K 1 .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method as in claim 4 in which the number of traces per record is at least 100.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method as in claim 1 in which said step (c) of correlating a pair of corresponding traces comprises the steps of a. multiplying said two corresponding traces; b. varying the time phase of one of said pair of traces with respect to the other, and repeating said multiplying step; c. integrating said products at each value of time phase; d. displaying said integrals as a function of said time phase.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method as in claim 1 in which said correlation is made between selected equal portions of each of said traces.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method as in claim 7 in which said selected portion of said traces includes the portion from the first break to a selected time interval after said first break.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method as in claim 8 in which said selected time interval is less than 100 milliseconds.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method as in claim 8 in which said time interval is less than 250 milliseconds.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method as in claim 1 in which said step of correlation comprises the steps of measuring the travel time for each trace from the time break to the first break and, subtracting one travel time from the other.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method as in claim 11 in which the time difference is measured optically from a printed record.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method as in claim 1 in which the source is impulsive.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as in claim 1 in which said source is vibratory, and including the step of correlating the record against the sweep before correlating said pair of traces.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method as in claim 1 in which said sources are surface sources.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method as in claim 1 in which each source point coincides with a geophone position.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method as in claim 1 in which there are as many source points as geophone positions.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
164 words
In a seismic system having a linear array of source positions A, B, C, and F, G, H, etc. and receiver positions D and E therebetween, the method of determining the differential static correction through the weathered layer at receiver points D and E, comprising the steps of: a. recording a first record from down line source F to receivers D and E to obtain a first trace pair FD and FE; b. recording a second record from up line source C to receivers D and E to obtain a second trace pair CD and CE; c. correlating said first trace pair FD and FE to provide a first time difference R between the first trace pair; d. correlating said second trace pair CD and CE to provide a second time difference S between the second trace pair; and e. determining K 1 = (R - S)/2, where K 1 is the first value of differential static correction at receiver positions D and E.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
164 words
In a seismic system having a linear array of source positions A, B, C, and F, G, H, etc. and receiver positions D and E therebetween, the method of determining the differential static correction through the weathered layer at receiver points D and E, comprising the steps of: a. recording a first record from down line source F to receivers D and E to obtain a first trace pair FD and FE; b. recording a second record from up line source C to receivers D and E to obtain a second trace pair CD and CE; c. correlating said first trace pair FD and FE to provide a first time difference R between the first trace pair; d. correlating said second trace pair CD and CE to provide a second time difference S between the second trace pair; and e. determining K 1 = (R - S)/2, where K 1 is the first value of differential static correction at receiver positions D and E.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method as in claim 18 including repeating the steps (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) for other source positions C and F, such as B and G respectively; f. determining a second value of K 2 for sources B and G; and g. Determining K A , the average value of K 1 and K 2 .
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method as in claim 18 including h. repeating steps (a), and (b) for a new position of F, such as G; i. repeating step (c) to obtain a new value R G of R; j. repeating step (e) using values of R G and S to provide a value K 3 of K = (R G - S)/2; and k. determining the average value K A of K 3 and K 1 .
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1981-01-16 | 1981-07-18 | 1982-01-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1985-01-16 | 1985-07-18 | 1986-01-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1989-01-16 | 1989-07-18 | 1990-01-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |