← Back to Patent Explorer
US3731269A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Static corrections for seismic traces by cross-correlation method

Assignee: Chevron USA Inc
•
Filing: 1971-04-05
•
Granted: 1973-05-01
•
Expires: 1991-04-05
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method is disclosed for determining source-to-datum corrections for a multitrace seismic cross-section. The method comprises the measurement of a multiplicity of cross-correlation functions between selected traces of the seismic section to establish a redundant set of simultaneous equations including the desired source-to-datum and geophone-to-datum quantities. The simultaneous equations are then solved for the desired corrections by the least squares error method. The method of the invention also provides for the determination of residual normal moveout corrections.

Inventors

  • 👤 R Judson
  • 👤 J Sherwood

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 23:14
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/36; G01V1/362; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/50; G01V2210/52; G01V2210/53

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim 322 words
A method for determining the best values of static correction to be applied to each amplitude versus time trace of a multitrace seismic record representing the output amplitudes of spatially adjacent geophone locations, by determining the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane corrections for each source and each geophone employed in a seismic survey, said method using intertrace cross-correlation time-lag measurements between a plurality of pairs of traces of said record, and taking account of the possibility that measured intertrace crosscorrelation time-lag values between the correlated traces may be composed not only of source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datumplane time components, but also, simultaneously, of time components due to subsurface structural reflection time variations between said correlated pairs of traces and time components due to residual normal moveout variations between said correlated pairs of traces, comprising the steps of: a. constraining said variations of the unknown structural reflection time components, and the unknown residual normal moveout time components by defining their individual unknown values respectively in terms of fewer reference unknown values, b. constraining the variation of at least some of said sourceto-datum correction time components and some of said geophoneto-datum correction time components by the introduction of preliminary, field measured, and field estimated, source-todatum-plane time values and geophone-to-datum-plane time values, both of said time values including error quantities to be minimized, c. generating a redundant set of simultaneous linear equations, corresponding to a redundant set of said cross-correlation time-lag measurements, whose unknowns are (i) said source-todatum corrections, (ii) said geophone-to-datum corrections, (iii) said reference unknown structural reflection time components, and (iv) said reference unknown residual normal moveout time components, d. then solving said redundant set of linear equations for source-to-datum and geophone-to-datum corrections to be applied as said determined static corrections to each of said traces of said record, by minimizing the sum of the squares of the individual amounts by which the individual equations of said redundant set are not satisfied by their common solution.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 322 words
A method for determining the best values of static correction to be applied to each amplitude versus time trace of a multitrace seismic record representing the output amplitudes of spatially adjacent geophone locations, by determining the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane corrections for each source and each geophone employed in a seismic survey, said method using intertrace cross-correlation time-lag measurements between a plurality of pairs of traces of said record, and taking account of the possibility that measured intertrace crosscorrelation time-lag values between the correlated traces may be composed not only of source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datumplane time components, but also, simultaneously, of time components due to subsurface structural reflection time variations between said correlated pairs of traces and time components due to residual normal moveout variations between said correlated pairs of traces, comprising the steps of: a. constraining said variations of the unknown structural reflection time components, and the unknown residual normal moveout time components by defining their individual unknown values respectively in terms of fewer reference unknown values, b. constraining the variation of at least some of said sourceto-datum correction time components and some of said geophoneto-datum correction time components by the introduction of preliminary, field measured, and field estimated, source-todatum-plane time values and geophone-to-datum-plane time values, both of said time values including error quantities to be minimized, c. generating a redundant set of simultaneous linear equations, corresponding to a redundant set of said cross-correlation time-lag measurements, whose unknowns are (i) said source-todatum corrections, (ii) said geophone-to-datum corrections, (iii) said reference unknown structural reflection time components, and (iv) said reference unknown residual normal moveout time components, d. then solving said redundant set of linear equations for source-to-datum and geophone-to-datum corrections to be applied as said determined static corrections to each of said traces of said record, by minimizing the sum of the squares of the individual amounts by which the individual equations of said redundant set are not satisfied by their common solution.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 55 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said trace pairs used for said intertrace cross-correlation time-lag measurements comprise traces selected from the classes: a. trace-pairs that represent common sources, but different geophones, b. trace-pairs that represent common geophones, but different sources, c. trace-pairs that represent common offset distances, and d. trace-pairs that represent common depth points.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the value of one of said reference unknown structural reflection time components is fixed, and others of said reference unknown values are expressed in terms of said fixed unknown value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 55 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said cross-correlation tIme-lag values are weighted in accordance with their known reliability, and the solution of said redundant set of linear equations minimizes the sum of the weighted squares of the individual amounts by which the individual equations of said redundant set are not satisfied by their common solution.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 67 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said solving in step (d) is accomplished by a. converting said redundant set of linear equations to their corresponding normal equations that will result in minimizing said error quantities, b. then, with the use of a high speed computer, solving said normal equations for said source-to-datum-plane and said geophone-to-datum-plane corrections for each source and geophone, respectively, employed in said seismic survey.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 47 words
The method of claim 1 with the additional step of shifting each trace of said seismic record with respect to its original position on said seismic record in accordance with the determined source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane correction for the specific source and geophone employed in producing that trace.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 250 words
A method for determining the static correction to be applied to each trace of a multitrace seismic record by determining the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane corrections for each particular source and each particular geophone employed to produce said trace in said multitrace seismic record, said method using a multiplicity of intertrace cross-correlation time-lag measurements between selected pairs of traces in said record, and taking account of the possibility that measured intertrace cross-correlation time-lag values may be composed not only of source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components, but also, simultaneously, of time components due to subsurface structural reflection time variations between traces and time components due to residual normal moveout variations between traces, comprising the steps of: a. generating from said measured cross-correlation time-lag values, derived from pairs of cross-correlated traces, a redundant set of simultaneous linear equations including error quantities to be minimized, said set comprising one equation for each cross-correlation time-lag value and each equation containing a different set of said source-to-datum-plane time components, said geophone-to-datum-plane time components, said structural reflection time components and said residual normal moveout time components, b. then solving said redundant set of simultaneous linear equations, minimizing said error quantities by the least-squares-error method, for the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components to be applied for the particular source and particular geophone employed in producing each of said cross-correlated traces, c. and shifting each trace on said record in accordance with its found particular source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components constituting said static correction for that trace.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 250 words
A method for determining the static correction to be applied to each trace of a multitrace seismic record by determining the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane corrections for each particular source and each particular geophone employed to produce said trace in said multitrace seismic record, said method using a multiplicity of intertrace cross-correlation time-lag measurements between selected pairs of traces in said record, and taking account of the possibility that measured intertrace cross-correlation time-lag values may be composed not only of source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components, but also, simultaneously, of time components due to subsurface structural reflection time variations between traces and time components due to residual normal moveout variations between traces, comprising the steps of: a. generating from said measured cross-correlation time-lag values, derived from pairs of cross-correlated traces, a redundant set of simultaneous linear equations including error quantities to be minimized, said set comprising one equation for each cross-correlation time-lag value and each equation containing a different set of said source-to-datum-plane time components, said geophone-to-datum-plane time components, said structural reflection time components and said residual normal moveout time components, b. then solving said redundant set of simultaneous linear equations, minimizing said error quantities by the least-squares-error method, for the individual source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components to be applied for the particular source and particular geophone employed in producing each of said cross-correlated traces, c. and shifting each trace on said record in accordance with its found particular source-to-datum-plane and geophone-to-datum-plane time components constituting said static correction for that trace.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3284765A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1976-04-30 1976-10-30 1977-05-01 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1980-04-30 1980-10-30 1981-05-01 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1984-04-30 1984-10-30 1985-05-01 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag