Patent BE765987A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US487639A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4045823A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4045823A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Current limiting devices for alternating current systems
Assignee: Rolls Royce Power Engineering PLC
•
Filing: 1976-01-14
•
Granted: 1977-08-30
•
Expires: 1996-01-14
Abstract
Abstract A current-limiting device for A.C. systems comprises saturable reactors with superconducting bias windings which maintain the reactors in saturation for normal A.C. loads. Excess current drives one of the reactors out of saturation on alternate half-cycles and thus creates a large flux change with accompanying back EMF to limit the current. The device is applicable to the connection of electric power distribution systems to limit fault currents and to allow power transfer without loss of stability.
Inventors
- 👤 Kenneth Charles Parton
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-30 21:46
CPC Classifications
H; H02; H02H; H02H9/00; H02H9/02; G; G05; G05F; G05F3/00; G05F3/02; G05F3/04; G05F3/06; H01; H01F; H01F29/00; H01F29/14; H01F29/143; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S336/00; Y10S336/01; Y10S505/00; Y10S505/825; Y10S505/85
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
126 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor having an alternating current winding and a direct current super-conducting bias winding, the bias winding being capable of maintaining the core of the reactor saturated under full load alternating current conditions, the alternating current windings in each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding alone is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one or other of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
126 words
A current-limiting device for an alternating current system comprising for each phase of the system at least two iron-cored saturable reactors, each reactor having an alternating current winding and a direct current super-conducting bias winding, the bias winding being capable of maintaining the core of the reactor saturated under full load alternating current conditions, the alternating current windings in each phase being so arranged and connected that under full load conditions a change in the level of saturation in any one reactor core relative to the bias level due to the bias winding alone is accompanied by a compensating change in saturation level in another core or cores, current limiting occurring when on each half-cycle one or other of the cores is forced out of saturation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
23 words
A device as claimed in claim 1 in which the alternating current windings in each phase are connected in series with one another.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
A device as claimed in claim 1 in which the superconducting bias windings of all the reactors are formed by a single superconducting loop.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
17 words
A device as claimed in claim 1 including means for varying the bias level of each reactor.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
A device as claimed in claim 4 in which the said means includes means for varying the current supply to the bias winding.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
A device as claimed in claim 4 in which the said means include an air gap magnetic core, linking the bias winding, and a control winding on the said air-gap core.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
A device as claimed in claim 1 including an alternating current mesh winding of material of normal conductivity linking the cores of all the reactors.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
25 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 1 having an electrical-energy-absorbing element connected in parallel therewith to improve the stability of the alternating current system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
15 words
A device as claimed in claim 8 in which the electrical-energy-absorbing element is a resistor.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
A device as claimed in claim 9 having an inductive element in series with the resistor to minimize energy loss under full load conditions.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
60 words
A power transfer system comprising two electrical power supply systems connected through a current-limiting device as claimed in claim 4, and a control device cyclically varying the bias level of the current limiting device as a function of the phase angle between the systems between upper and lower levels such that pulsed power transfer takes place between the supply systems.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
52 words
A power transfer system as claimed in claim 11 having three current-limiting devices connected in parallel between the supply systems and having a similar cyclic variation of bias level in each current-limiting device but offset by 120° from one device to the next to produce a substantially constant level of power transfer.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
80 words
A method of current limiting in an alternating current line or network comprising connecting in series in the line or network an iron-cored inductive choke device provided with a superconducting direct current biasing winding whereby under normal full load conditions the device operates entirely in the region of saturation and has a low impedence whilst upon increase of current the device is forced out of saturation on alternate half cycles and reacts to present substantial impedence to the excess current.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
80 words
A method of current limiting in an alternating current line or network comprising connecting in series in the line or network an iron-cored inductive choke device provided with a superconducting direct current biasing winding whereby under normal full load conditions the device operates entirely in the region of saturation and has a low impedence whilst upon increase of current the device is forced out of saturation on alternate half cycles and reacts to present substantial impedence to the excess current.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
115 words
A current limiting device for a three-phase alternating current system comprising three pairs of iron-cored saturable reactors, the two cores of each pair each carrying an alternating current winding and these two windings being series-connected in one phase of the system in such a manner as to produce opposed flux changes in the two cores, a single turn direct-current superconducting bias winding linking the six reactor cores, at least one air-gap magnetic core linked by the bias winding, said bias winding saturating said reactor cores under normal full alternating current load conditions, whereby current-limiting is effected when excess current drives each core out of saturation on alternate half cycles and thereby creates large flux changes.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
115 words
A current limiting device for a three-phase alternating current system comprising three pairs of iron-cored saturable reactors, the two cores of each pair each carrying an alternating current winding and these two windings being series-connected in one phase of the system in such a manner as to produce opposed flux changes in the two cores, a single turn direct-current superconducting bias winding linking the six reactor cores, at least one air-gap magnetic core linked by the bias winding, said bias winding saturating said reactor cores under normal full alternating current load conditions, whereby current-limiting is effected when excess current drives each core out of saturation on alternate half cycles and thereby creates large flux changes.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
33 words
A current-limiting device as claimed in claim 14 having an alternating current mesh winding comprising six windings, one on each iron-cored saturable reactor, whereby harmonic currents in the line or network are minimized.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
19 words
A current-limiting device in accordance with claim 1 and further including an air-gap magnetic core linking the bias winding.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-08-29 | 1981-02-28 | 1981-08-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-08-29 | 1985-02-28 | 1985-08-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-08-29 | 1989-02-28 | 1989-08-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |