Patent US4035474A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4035474A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

CBA for Claus tail gas cleanup

Assignee: BP Corp North America Inc
•
Filing: 1976-03-01
•
Granted: 1977-07-12
•
Expires: 1996-03-01
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An improved method for further removal of sulfur from the tail gas of a conventional Claus plant by the use of a Cold Bed Adsorption process involving the specific improvement of maintaining at all times the lead Claus reactor of a series of such reactors at sufficiently high temperatures to promote hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 and then utilizing part or all of the hot effluent gases of this lead reactor to regenerate the sulfur-fouled Cold Bed Adsorption catalyst by passing the hot stream through the fouled reactor, removing the deposited sulfur and then returning the stream to the Claus plant at a point essentially immediately downstream from where it was originally withdrawn. Such a method is useful in maintaining ultra-high sulfur conversion levels on a commercial scale.

Inventors

  • 👤 Lorenz V. Kunkel
  • 👤 John W. Palm
  • 👤 Luther E. Petty
  • 👤 Howard Grekel

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-29 17:10
CPC Classifications
C; C01; C01B; C01B17/00; C01B17/02; C01B17/04; C01B17/0404; C01B17/0426; C01B17/0439

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 294 words
In a process for catalytic conversion of a gaseous stream containing hydrogen sulfide wherein said stream is subjected to an oxidation step to produce a reaction mixture in which hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide are present in a molar ratio of about 2:1 and wherein the sulfur content of said reaction mixture is substantially reduced by first passing said mixture through a series of at least two Claus reactors with associated liquid sulfur condensers, and then passing the resulting Claus effluent through a CBA cleanup step involving at least two interchangeable CBA reactors wherein said Claus effluent at all times passes through at least one of said CBA reactors being sufficiently regenerated to further convert and condense the sulfur for a time sufficient to allow said other interchangeable CBA reactor to be regenerated by thermal removal of deposited sulfur followed by cooling of the sulfur-denuded CBA reactor, the improvement comprising: (a) maintaining the reaction conditions of a lead Claus reactor such that the effluent temperature of said reactor is from 600° to 800° F., thus promoting hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 ; (b) diverting, periodically, a stream of said 600° to 800° F. effluent of said lead Claus reactor to the CBA reactor having deposited sulfur on the catalyst bed of said CBA reactor, thereby vaporizing and removing said deposited sulfur and regenerating said CBA catalyst bed; (c) returning the effluent of said CBA reactor being regenerated during said period of regeneration to a point downstream from said lead Claus reactor and downstream from where said stream is diverted but upstream to a subsequent second Claus reactor; and (d) cooling the sulfur-denuded CBA reactor before returning it to the cleanup mode for further removal of sulfur from the effluent of said Claus reactors.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 294 words
In a process for catalytic conversion of a gaseous stream containing hydrogen sulfide wherein said stream is subjected to an oxidation step to produce a reaction mixture in which hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide are present in a molar ratio of about 2:1 and wherein the sulfur content of said reaction mixture is substantially reduced by first passing said mixture through a series of at least two Claus reactors with associated liquid sulfur condensers, and then passing the resulting Claus effluent through a CBA cleanup step involving at least two interchangeable CBA reactors wherein said Claus effluent at all times passes through at least one of said CBA reactors being sufficiently regenerated to further convert and condense the sulfur for a time sufficient to allow said other interchangeable CBA reactor to be regenerated by thermal removal of deposited sulfur followed by cooling of the sulfur-denuded CBA reactor, the improvement comprising: (a) maintaining the reaction conditions of a lead Claus reactor such that the effluent temperature of said reactor is from 600° to 800° F., thus promoting hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 ; (b) diverting, periodically, a stream of said 600° to 800° F. effluent of said lead Claus reactor to the CBA reactor having deposited sulfur on the catalyst bed of said CBA reactor, thereby vaporizing and removing said deposited sulfur and regenerating said CBA catalyst bed; (c) returning the effluent of said CBA reactor being regenerated during said period of regeneration to a point downstream from said lead Claus reactor and downstream from where said stream is diverted but upstream to a subsequent second Claus reactor; and (d) cooling the sulfur-denuded CBA reactor before returning it to the cleanup mode for further removal of sulfur from the effluent of said Claus reactors.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 34 words
A process of claim 1 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent is returned to the inlet of a condenser which is located downstream of said lead Claus reactor and upstream of said second Claus reactor.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 25 words
A process of claim 1 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent flows to a condenser for sulfur removal and then to a blower before being returned.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process of claim 3 wherein said diverted stream is from about 5 to 75 percent of said effluent of said Claus reactor.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 43 words
A process of claim 4 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent is returned to the outlet of the hot side of a reheat exchanger which is located upstream of another condenser, downstream of said lead Claus reactor and upstream of said second Claus reactor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 39 words
A process of claim 1 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent flows to a condenser for sulfur removal and then is returned to the inlet of the cold side of a reheat exchanger located upstream from said second Claus reactor.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 50 words
A process of claim 1 wherein the direction of flow of said diverted stream through said CBA reactor during the removal of deposited sulfur is opposite to the direction of flow of the effluent gas from said Claus plant during catalytic conversion and depositing of sulfur by said CBA reactor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 36 words
A process of claim 7 wherein the direction of flow of said diverted stream during removal of deposited sulfur is upflow and the direction of flow of said effluent gas from said Claus plant is downflow.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 36 words
A process of claim 7 wherein the direction of flow of said diverted stream during removal of deposited sulfur is downflow and the direction of flow of said effluent gas from said Claus plant is upflow.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 54 words
A process of claim 1 wherein the direction of flow of said cooling gas through said CBA reactor after removal of said deposited sulfur in said CBA reactor is opposite to the direction of flow of the effluent gas from said Claus plant during catalytic conversion and depositing of sulfur by said CBA reactor.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 31 words
A process of claim 10 wherein the direction of flow of said cooling gas is upflow and the direction of flow of said effluent gas from said Claus plant is downflow.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 31 words
A process of claim 10 wherein the direction of flow of said cooling gas is downflow and the direction of flow of said effluent gas from said Claus plant is upflow.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 49 words
A process of claim 1 wherein the direction of flow of said diverted stream and the cooling gas through said CBA reactor is the same and the cooling and regeneration time cycle overlap to allow cooling to begin at the inlet of said CBA reactor before regeneration is completed.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 39 words
A process of claim 1 wherein there are three CBA reactors downstream from said Claus plant, two of said CBA reactors acting in parallel to clean up the Claus plant effluent while the third CBA reactor is being regenerated.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 84 words
A method of claim 1 wherein the need for a condenser downstream from said CBA reactor is eliminated by returning the flow of CBA regeneration and cooling effluent to a point upstream of at least one condenser and Claus reactor in series, during the regeneration and the cooling of said CBA reactors and during the time when reverse Claus reaction products are present in the CBA effluent, and at all other times directing the CBA effluent to an incinerator without passing through a condenser.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 89 words
A process of claim 1 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent is returned to the inlet of a condenser which is located downstream of said lead Claus reactor and upstream of said second Claus reactor and wherein the direction of flow of said diverted stream through said CBA reactor during regeneration and the flow of said cooling gas through said CBA reactor after regeneration is opposite to the direction of flow of the effluent gas from said Claus plant during catalytic conversion and depositing of sulfur by said CBA reactor.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 47 words
A process of claim 5 wherein said CBA regeneration effluent being returned to the outlet of the hot side of said reheat exchanger then flows to the inlet of a condenser which is located downstream of said lead Claus reactor and upstream of said second Claus reactor.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

GB722038A Cited
US3702884A Cited
US3758676A Cited
US3749762A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1980-07-11 1981-01-10 1981-07-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1984-07-11 1985-01-10 1985-07-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1988-07-11 1989-01-10 1989-07-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag