Patent US4023972A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4023972A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of preparing a blend of fogged, direct-positive silver halide emulsions of different average grain sizes
Assignee: Agfa Gevaert NV
•
Filing: 1974-06-07
•
Granted: 1977-05-17
•
Expires: 1994-06-07
Abstract
Abstract A method is described of preparing a blend of direct-positive silver halide emulsions that has a pAg value of at least 8.35 from two or more direct-positive silver halide emulsions of different average grain-sizes comprising fogged silver halide grains and having pAg values below 8.35, without inducing physical ripening, by raising the pAg to the value of at least 8.35 before or after blending the emulsions, and providing at least one electron-accepting or halogen-conducting compound, at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains prior to raising the pAg to the value of at least 8.35.
Inventors
- 👤 Willy Joseph Vanassche
- 👤 Herman Alberik Pattyn
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 20:42
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03C; G03C1/00; G03C1/005; G03C1/485; G03C1/48515
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
175 words
Method of making a direct-positive photographic silver halide material which comprises a support and a layer of an emulsion blend having a pAg value of at least 8.35, by the steps of: 1. preparing two or more direct-positive silver halide emulsions of different average grain-sizes comprising fogged silver halide grains and having pAg values below 8.35, wherein one direct-positive silver halide emulsion of the blend has an average grain size of at least 50% greater than another emulsion of the blend, 2. raising the pAg values of the separate emulsions to a value of at least 8.35 and subsequently blending the emulsions or blending the separate emulsions and subsequently raising the pAg of the emulsion blend to a value of at least 8.35, 3. providing at least one halogen conducting or electron-accepting compound at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains prior to raising the pAg value to a value of at least 8.35, and 4. coating on a support a layer of the emulsion blend having a pAg value of at least 8.35.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
175 words
Method of making a direct-positive photographic silver halide material which comprises a support and a layer of an emulsion blend having a pAg value of at least 8.35, by the steps of: 1. preparing two or more direct-positive silver halide emulsions of different average grain-sizes comprising fogged silver halide grains and having pAg values below 8.35, wherein one direct-positive silver halide emulsion of the blend has an average grain size of at least 50% greater than another emulsion of the blend, 2. raising the pAg values of the separate emulsions to a value of at least 8.35 and subsequently blending the emulsions or blending the separate emulsions and subsequently raising the pAg of the emulsion blend to a value of at least 8.35, 3. providing at least one halogen conducting or electron-accepting compound at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains prior to raising the pAg value to a value of at least 8.35, and 4. coating on a support a layer of the emulsion blend having a pAg value of at least 8.35.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
61 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the separate direct-positive silver halide emulsions to be blended are provided at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains with at least one electron-accepting or halogen-conducting compound whereupon the pAg-values of the separate emulsions are raised to the value of at least 8.35 and the emulsions are then mixed to form the emulsion blend.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
60 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the separate direct-positive silver halide emulsions to be blended are provided at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains with at least one electron-accepting or halogen-conducting compound, whereupon the emulsions are mixed to form an emulsion blend and the pAg of the emulsion blend is raised to the value of at least 8.35.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
68 words
Method according to claim 1 comprising the steps of blending two or more direct-positive silver halide emulsions of different average grain-sizes comprising fogged silver halide grains and having pAg values below 8.35, providing at least one electron-accepting or halogen-conducting compound at the surface of the fogged silver halide grains of the emulsion blend and raising the pAg of the emulsion blend to the value of at least 8.35.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the emulsions to be blended have pAg values in the range from about 5 to about 7.7.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the pAg is raised to a value in the range from about 9 to about 11.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein raising the pAg occurs by addition of a compound, yielding bromide and/or iodide ions in aqueous medium.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein in addition to raising the pAg, the pH is lowered to a value below 6.5.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the silver halide grains of the separate emulsions have been fogged by reduction sensitization.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
23 words
Method according to claim 9, wherein the reduction sensitization occurs in the presence of a compound of a metal more electropositive than silver.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
Method according to claim 1, wherein the surface of the fogged silver halide grains are provided with an electron-accepting compound and a spectrally sensitizing dye.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
Method according to claim 11, wherein the electron accepting compound is a nitrostyryl or nitrobenzylidene dye.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3367778A
Cited
GB1186718A
Cited
US3531290A
Cited
US3615610A
Cited
US3615573A
Cited
GB1287425A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-05-16 | 1980-11-15 | 1981-05-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-05-16 | 1984-11-15 | 1985-05-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-05-16 | 1988-11-15 | 1989-05-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |