US4016034A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Nuclear reactor control override system and method
Assignee: Combustion Engineering Inc
•
Filing: 1974-07-19
•
Granted: 1977-04-05
•
Expires: 1994-07-19
Abstract
Abstract A system is provided which prevents the operation of a nuclear reactor in a region of a prohibited reactor power distribution. The method of operation includes inhibiting the insertion of control rods into the reactor on the basis of a power dependent control rod insertion limit and further overriding the control of the reactor by rapidly reducing reactor power when reactor power increases to a reactor power which exceeds by a predetermined margin the limit set by the power dependent control rod insertion limit.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles Ronald Musick
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 22:03
CPC Classifications
G; G21; G21C; G21C7/00; G21C7/36; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
173 words
An apparatus for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor system having control rods by preventing the operation of the nuclear reactor with other than predetermined permissible control rod configurations for given values of bulk power, said permissible control rod configurations being such that local power does not exceed specified limits established to prevent fuel damage, wherein the apparatus comprising in combination: a. means for detecting the bulk power level of said nuclear reactor and for generating a signal proportional to bulk power; b. means for monitoring control rod position; and c. means responsive to said bulk power level detecting means and to said control rod position monitoring means, for determining whether a permissible control rod configuration exists for a given bulk power and for inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce the bulk power of said reactor to prevent said local power from exceeding said specified limits established to prevent fuel damage when a permissible control rod configuration does not exist for a given bulk power.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
173 words
An apparatus for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor system having control rods by preventing the operation of the nuclear reactor with other than predetermined permissible control rod configurations for given values of bulk power, said permissible control rod configurations being such that local power does not exceed specified limits established to prevent fuel damage, wherein the apparatus comprising in combination: a. means for detecting the bulk power level of said nuclear reactor and for generating a signal proportional to bulk power; b. means for monitoring control rod position; and c. means responsive to said bulk power level detecting means and to said control rod position monitoring means, for determining whether a permissible control rod configuration exists for a given bulk power and for inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce the bulk power of said reactor to prevent said local power from exceeding said specified limits established to prevent fuel damage when a permissible control rod configuration does not exist for a given bulk power.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The apparatus as recited in claim 1 for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor system having control rods, further including means responsive to said power level detecting means and to said control rod position monitoring means for inhibiting control rod insertion.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
139 words
The apparatus as recited in claim 1 for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor system having control rods wherein said means for inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce the bulk power of said reactor includes: a. means responsive to said signal proportional to bulk power for generating a biased signal, said biased signal consisting of a first portion which represents said signal proportional to bulk power and which has been tracked and held at its last minimum value and a second portion which represents a power excursion margin; and b. means for comparing said biased signal to said signal proportional to bulk power and for inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce the bulk power of said nuclear reactor when said signal proportional to bulk power equals or exceeds said biased signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
58 words
The apparatus for the prevention of fuel damage caused by a prohibited power configuration in a nuclear reactor having control rods as recited in claim 3, wherein said means for generating a biased signal includes: a. means for tracking and holding the last minimum value of an input signal; and b. means for adding a power excursion margin.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
86 words
The apparatus as recited in claim 4 wherein said means for tracking and holding the last minimum value of an input signal includes: a. means for inverting said signal proportional to bulk power to generate an inverted signal; b. means responsive to said means for inverting said signal proportional to bulk power for picking and holding of the peaks of said inverted signal; and c. means for inverting said peaks into valleys so that the last minimum value of said input signal is tracked and held.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
147 words
An apparatus as recited in claim 2, for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor system having control rods, said reactor being cooled by a coolant circulated therethrough wherein said means for detecting a the bulk power level of said nuclear reactor includes: a. means responsive to reactor coolant temperature rise for generating a signal indicative of bulk reactor power as a function of thermal energy added to the coolant; b. means responsive to reactor neutron flux for generating a signal indicative of bulk reactor power as a function of neutron flux; and c. means responsive to said signal indicative of bulk reactor power as a function of thermal energy added to the coolant and to said signal indicative of bulk reactor power as a function of neutron flux for selecting the signal commensurate with the highest reactor power level.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
127 words
An apparatus for the prevention of fuel damage caused by prohibited power configurations in a nuclear reactor having control rods, as recited in claim 2, wherein said means for inhibiting control rod insertion includes: a. means responsive to said means for detecting the bulk power level of said nuclear reactor for generating a control rod position setpoint which varies as a function of said nuclear reactor bulk power; b. means responsive to said means for generating a control rod position setpoint and to said means for monitoring control rod position for comparing said control rod position and said control rod position setpoint; and c. means responsive to said comparison means for inhibiting said control rod insertion when said control rod position reaches said control rod position setpoint.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
138 words
A process for the prevention of fuel damage in a critical nuclear reactor having control rods, wherein the process comprising the steps of: a. determining permissible control rod configurations for each value of bulk power, said permissible control rod configurations being such that local power does not exceed specified limits established to prevent fuel damage; b. determining from said permissible control rod configurations for each value of bulk power a power dependent control rod insertion limit; c. generating a signal indicative of bulk reactor power; d. generating a signal indicative of control rod position; and e. in response to said indication of bulk reactor power, said indication of control rod position, and said power dependent control rod insertion limit, inserting sufficient negative reactivity to prevent local reactor power from exceeding said specified limits established to prevent fuel damage.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
138 words
A process for the prevention of fuel damage in a critical nuclear reactor having control rods, wherein the process comprising the steps of: a. determining permissible control rod configurations for each value of bulk power, said permissible control rod configurations being such that local power does not exceed specified limits established to prevent fuel damage; b. determining from said permissible control rod configurations for each value of bulk power a power dependent control rod insertion limit; c. generating a signal indicative of bulk reactor power; d. generating a signal indicative of control rod position; and e. in response to said indication of bulk reactor power, said indication of control rod position, and said power dependent control rod insertion limit, inserting sufficient negative reactivity to prevent local reactor power from exceeding said specified limits established to prevent fuel damage.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
100 words
The process of claim 8 wherein said step of determining a power dependent control rod insertion limit includes the steps of: a. determining a locus of points defined by a plurality of said control rod configurations for a plurality of values of bulk power, said locus of points constituting a curve designated the effective power dependent control rod insertion limit; b. determining a maximum permissible power excursion to determine an excursion margin; and c. subtracting said excursion margin from said effective power dependent control rod insertion limit to obtain a curve designated the actual power dependent control rod insertion limit.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
72 words
The process of claim 9 further including the steps of: a. inhibiting control rod insertion when said actual power dependent control rod insertion limit is reached for a given bulk reactor power level; and b. when said bulk reactor power undergoes a power excursion in the increasing direction which exceeds said predetermined excursion margin, inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce bulk reactor power so that said excursion margin is no longer exceeded.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
32 words
The process as recited in claim 10 wherein said step of inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce bulk reactor power includes the step of scramming the control rods into the reactor core.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
123 words
The process as recited in claim 10 wherein said step of inserting sufficient negative reactivity to reduce bulk reactor power when said reactor power undergoes a power excursion in the increasing direction which exceeds a predetermined margin includes the steps of: a. generating a variable excursion setpoint by tracking and holding the minimum value of the sum of said bulk reactor power and said excursion margin; b. resetting said excursion setpoint to a value larger than said minimum value of the sum of said excursion margin and said bulk reactor power only on permission from an independent decision maker; c. comparing said bulk reactor power to said excursion setpoint; and d. inserting negative reactivity when said bulk reactor power exceeds said excursion setpoint.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
87 words
The process as recited in claim 10 wherein the step of inhibiting control rod insertion when said actual power dependent insertion limit is reached includes the steps of: a. generating a control rod position setpoint from said signal indicative of said bulk reactor power and from said actual power dependent control rod insertion limit; b. comparing said control rod position setpoint to said signal indicative of control rod position; and c. inhibiting control rod insertion when said control rod position signal reaches said control rod position setpoint.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
111 words
The process as recited in claim 13 wherein the step of monitoring bulk reactor power and generating a signal indicative of said bulk reactor power includes the steps of: a. monitoring the nuclear reactor neutron flux and generating therefrom a signal indicative of neutron flux power; b. monitoring the nuclear reactor's coolant temperature upstream and downstream of the reactor core and generating therefrom a reactor power signal as a function of thermal energy added to the coolant; and c. auctioneering said signals indicative of neutron flux power and said power signal as a function of thermal energy added to the coolant and choosing the signal indicating a higher bulk reactor power.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3202804A
Cited
US3356577A
Cited
US3423285A
Cited
US3565760A
Cited
US3899727A
Cited
US3706921A
Cited
US3656074A
Cited
US3752735A
Cited
US3791922A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1980-04-04 | 1980-10-04 | 1981-04-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1984-04-04 | 1984-10-04 | 1985-04-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1988-04-04 | 1988-10-04 | 1989-04-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |