Patent US3993672A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US3993672A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for direct olefin oxidation
Assignee: Bpifrance Financement SA
•
Filing: 1974-08-21
•
Granted: 1976-11-23
•
Expires: 1994-08-21
Abstract
Abstract Olefins containing from 3 to 30 carbon atoms are directly oxidized to epoxides and allyl alcohols in the liquid phase by contact with a gas stream comprising oxygen but substantially free from hydrogen, in the presence of two metal compound catalysts which are soluble in the reaction mixture. The catalysts are preferably a compound of a Group VII or VIII metal and a compound of a Group VA or VIA transition metal.
Inventors
- 👤 Henri Arzoumanian
- 👤 Alain A. Blanc
- 👤 Ulrich Hartig
- 👤 Jacques V. Metzger
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 06:26
CPC Classifications
C; C07; C07D; C07D303/00; C07D303/02; C07D303/04; C07D301/00; C07D301/02; C07D301/03; C07D301/04; C07D301/06
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
112 words
A process for oxidising an olefin containing from 3 to 30 carbon atoms to form an epoxide and an allyl alcohol, which process comprises forming a solution of the olefin in an organic solvent which is not oxidised under the reaction conditions, dissolving in the solution a first catalyst which is a soluble compound of rhodium, and a second catalyst which is a soluble compound of molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, niobium, titanium, and manganese which together catalyse the oxidation of the olefin, and contacting the catalyst-containing solution so formed with a gas which includes oxygen but is free from hydrogen, until substantial quantities of the epoxide and the allyl alcohol have been formed.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
112 words
A process for oxidising an olefin containing from 3 to 30 carbon atoms to form an epoxide and an allyl alcohol, which process comprises forming a solution of the olefin in an organic solvent which is not oxidised under the reaction conditions, dissolving in the solution a first catalyst which is a soluble compound of rhodium, and a second catalyst which is a soluble compound of molybdenum, tungsten, vanadium, niobium, titanium, and manganese which together catalyse the oxidation of the olefin, and contacting the catalyst-containing solution so formed with a gas which includes oxygen but is free from hydrogen, until substantial quantities of the epoxide and the allyl alcohol have been formed.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
118 words
A process for oxidizing an olefin containing from 3 to 30 carbon atoms to form an epoxide and an allyl alcohol, which process comprises forming a liquid phase containing the reactants and a non-oxidizable solvent having dissolved therein the said olefin, a first soluble metal catalyst and a second soluble metal catalyst for the reaction, the first metal catalyst being a soluble compound of rhodium, and the second metal catalyst being a soluble compound of a metal selected from molybdenum, tungsten, niobium, titanium, manganese, and vanadium, and contacting the liquid phase with a gas which contains oxygen and is substantially free from hydrogen, at temperature which is below the boiling point of the olefin under the reaction conditions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
118 words
A process for oxidizing an olefin containing from 3 to 30 carbon atoms to form an epoxide and an allyl alcohol, which process comprises forming a liquid phase containing the reactants and a non-oxidizable solvent having dissolved therein the said olefin, a first soluble metal catalyst and a second soluble metal catalyst for the reaction, the first metal catalyst being a soluble compound of rhodium, and the second metal catalyst being a soluble compound of a metal selected from molybdenum, tungsten, niobium, titanium, manganese, and vanadium, and contacting the liquid phase with a gas which contains oxygen and is substantially free from hydrogen, at temperature which is below the boiling point of the olefin under the reaction conditions.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
A process according to claim 2 wherein the molar concentrations of the two catalysts are, respectively, in the ratio of about 0.7 to about 1.5.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
42 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is selected from aqueous chloro-tris-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, rhodium triacetylacetonate, chlorocarbonyl-bis-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, and the second catalyst is selected from molybdenum oxodiperoxaquohexamethylphosphorotriamide, vanadium triacetylacetonate, tungstic acid, molybdeum triacetylacetonate, molybdenum pentacarbonyl, niobium pentaethylate, manganese diacetylacetonate and titanium acetylacetonate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is selected from aqueous chloro-tris-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, rhodium triacetylacetonate, chlorocarbonylbis-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, and second catalyst is molybdenum oxodiperoxaquohexamethylphosphorotriamide.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is aqueous chloro-bis-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, and the second catalyst is vanadium triacetonacetonate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
29 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is chloro-tris-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, the second catalyst is selected from tungstic acid, niobium pentaethylate, manganese diacetylacetonate, titanium acetylacetonate and molybdenum triacetylacetonate,
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is rhodium triacetylacetonate, and the second catalyst is molybdenum triacetylacetonate.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the first catalyst is chlorocarbonyl-bis-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium, and the second catalyst is molybdenum pentacarbonyl.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process according to claim 1, wherein the solvent is selected from carbon tetrachloride, benzene, nitrobenzene, dinitrobenzene, chlorobenzene and fluorobenzene.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process according to claim 2, wherein the liquid phase also comprises a minute dose of a radical reaction initiator.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
A process according to claim 11, wherein the said initiator is selected from azo compounds, benzoyl peroxide and hydroperoxide, tertiary butyl hydroperoxide, and cumyl hydroperoxide.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
10 words
A process according to claim 11 wherein the initiator α,α'-azoisobutyronitrile.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process according to claim 2 wherein during contact of the liquid phase with the gas, the oxygen partial pressure is below flash point of the liquid phase but above 100 millibars, and the temperature is below the boiling point of the said olefin under the reaction conditions.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
25 words
A process according to claim 14, wherein the temperature is between 25° C and 150° C and the reaction is carried out at atmospheric pressure.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
126 words
A process according to claim 2 wherein the olefin is cyclohexene, the cyclohexene being present in the liquid phase at a concentration of 4.88 mols/litre, and wherein the first catalyst is chloro-tris-(triphenylphosphine)-rhodium at a concentration of from 1 to 2 × 10.sup. -3 mol/litre, and the second catalyst is molybdenum oxodiperoxaquohexamethylphosphorotriamide at a concentration 0.5 × 10.sup. -3 mol/litre greater than the said first catalyst, and wherein the liquid phase comprises nitrobenzene as solvent and tertiary butyl hydroperoxide at a concentration of 10.sup. -2 mol/litre as an initiator, and wherein the temperature is raised to 70° C under an oxygen pressure of 1 atmosphere and, after 150 minutes, 44 mol% of epoxide and a molar percentage of allyl alcohol of between 42 and 44% are obtained.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
FR1505337A
Cited
FR1506303A
Cited
DE1280234B
Cited
FR1572146A
Cited
GB1201086A
Cited
GB1206166A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-11-23 | 1980-05-24 | 1980-11-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-11-23 | 1984-05-24 | 1984-11-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-11-23 | 1988-05-24 | 1988-11-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |