Patent US4594471A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US3978488A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US3978488A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Offset fed electric microstrip dipole antenna

Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1975-04-24
•
Granted: 1976-08-31
•
Expires: 1995-04-24
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An offset fed electric microstrip dipole antenna consisting of a thin eleically conducting, element formed on one surface of a dielectric substrate, the ground plane being on the opposite surface. The length of the element determines the resonant frequency. The feed point is located along one edge of the antenna length and the input impedance can be varied by moving the feed point along the edge of the antenna to obtain optimum match for the resonant mode without affecting the radiation pattern. The antenna bandwidth increases with the width of the element and spacing between the element and ground plane. Slanting one end of the element will provide a slightly wider bandwidth.

Inventors

  • 👤 Cyril M. Kaloi

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-25 23:19
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01Q; H01Q9/00; H01Q9/04; H01Q9/0407; H01Q9/30; H01Q9/40

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim 320 words
An offset fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin substantially rectangular radiating element spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. the dimension of said radiating element along the length thereof lies in the E-plane and the dimension of said radiating element along the width thereof lies in the H-plane; the dimension of said radiating element which lies in the H-plane never being greater than the dimension thereof which lies in the E-plane; e. said radiating element having a feed point located along the edge of the length thereof; f. said radiating element being fed from a coaxial-to-microstrip adapter, the center pin of said adapter extending through said ground plane and dielectric substrate to said radiating element; g. the length of said radiating element determining the resonant frequency of said antenna; the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said edge of the length of said antenna radiating element without affecting the antenna radiation pattern; i. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width; j. said radiating element oscillating in only a resonant mode along the length of the element when the element width is less than one-half the element length; k. said radiating element oscillating in a resonant mode along its length and a non-resonant mode along its width when the element width is greater than one-half the element length; and l. optimum match for the resonant mode of oscillation being obtained by varying the location of said feed point along the element edge.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 320 words
An offset fed electric microstrip dipole antenna having low physical profile and conformal arraying capability, comprising: a. a thin ground plane conductor; b. a thin substantially rectangular radiating element spaced from said ground plane; c. said radiating element being electrically separated from said ground plane by a dielectric substrate; d. the dimension of said radiating element along the length thereof lies in the E-plane and the dimension of said radiating element along the width thereof lies in the H-plane; the dimension of said radiating element which lies in the H-plane never being greater than the dimension thereof which lies in the E-plane; e. said radiating element having a feed point located along the edge of the length thereof; f. said radiating element being fed from a coaxial-to-microstrip adapter, the center pin of said adapter extending through said ground plane and dielectric substrate to said radiating element; g. the length of said radiating element determining the resonant frequency of said antenna; the antenna input impedance being variable to match most practical impedances as said feed point is moved along said edge of the length of said antenna radiating element without affecting the antenna radiation pattern; i. the antenna bandwidth being variable with the width of the radiating element and the spacing between said radiating element and said ground plane, said spacing between the radiating element and the ground plane having somewhat greater effect on the bandwidth than the element width; j. said radiating element oscillating in only a resonant mode along the length of the element when the element width is less than one-half the element length; k. said radiating element oscillating in a resonant mode along its length and a non-resonant mode along its width when the element width is greater than one-half the element length; and l. optimum match for the resonant mode of oscillation being obtained by varying the location of said feed point along the element edge.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 29 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the ground plane conductor extends at least one wavelength beyond each edge of the radiating element to minimize any possible backlobe radiation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 42 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin, substantially rectangular radiating element is rectangular except for being slanted at one end thereof, such that along the length thereof one edge is slightly shorter than the other, providing a slightly greater bandwidth.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 22 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein a plurality of said radiating elements are arrayed to provide a near isotropic radiation pattern.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 17 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of said radiating element is approximately one-half wavelength.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 16 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin, substantially rectangular radiating element is exactly rectangular.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 21 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein said thin, rectangular radiating element is formed on one surface of said dielectric substrate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 83 words
A antenna as in claim 1 wherein the length of the antenna radiating element is substantially determined by the equation: A = [1.18 × 10.sup.10 - F × 4 × H × √ε]/[2 × F × √1 + 0.61 × (ε - 1) × (B/H).sup.0.1155 ] where A is the length to be determined F = the center frequency (Hz) B = the width of the antenna element H = the thickness of the dielectric ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 224 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the radiation patterns are power patterns, |E.sub.θ | 2 and |E.sub.φ | 2 , polarization field E.sub.θ and the field normal to the polarization field E.sub.φ , and are given by the equations: ##EQU17## and ##EQU18## where U = (U2 - U3)/U5 t = (t3 - t4)/t8 u2 = p sin (A × P/2)cos(k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U3 = k sin θ sin φ cos (A × P/2)sin(k × A × sin θ sin φ/2) U5 = (P 2 - k 2 sin 2 θ sin 2 φ) T3 = P sin (P × B/2)cos(k × B × cos θ/2) T4 = k cos θ cos (P × B/2) sin (k × B × cos θ/2) T8 = (P 2 - k 2 cos 2 θ) I m = maximum current (amps) ##EQU19## λ = free space wave length (inches) λ g = waveguide wavelength (inches) and λ g ≈ 2 × A + (4 × H/√ ε) r = the range between the antenna and an arbitrary point in space (inches) Z o = characteristic impedance of the element (ohms) and Z o is given by ##EQU20## H = the thickness of the dielectric B = the width of the antenna element ε = the dielectric constant of the substrate (no units).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 30 words
An antenna as in claim 1 wherein the minimum width of said radiating element is determined by the equivalent internal resistance of the conductor plus any loss due the dielectric.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3803623A Cited
US3811128A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1979-08-31 1980-03-01 1980-08-31 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1983-08-31 1984-03-01 1984-08-31 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1987-08-31 1988-03-01 1988-08-31 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag