Patent US3969928A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US3969928A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Non-destructive testing method for determining a body's mechanical properties and stresses

Assignee: SKF Compagnie dApplications Mecaniques SA
•
Filing: 1974-06-25
•
Granted: 1976-07-20
•
Expires: 1994-06-25
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The mechanical properties within a part are determined as a function of depth in a non-destructive manner by punching the body with a series of punches having different radii of curvature. Using a plastic criterion with the data obtained the elastic limit of the body as a function of depth is determined as well as the residual self-stresses that exist in the part.

Inventors

  • 👤 Joseph Zarka

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-29 12:43
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N3/00; G01N3/40; G01N3/42; G01N2203/00; G01N2203/0098

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim 171 words
A non-destructive testing method for determining the elastic limit of a body or part as a function of depth suitable for a part having been subjected to surface treatment comprising: a. subjecting the surface of said part to an increasing pressure exerted by a series of punches, each punch having a contact surface with a different radii of curvature; b. measuring the deformation in the vicinity of the punch of the surface of said part for each punch pressure; c. measuring the force (F e1 ) at which the deformation for each punch ceases to be elastic; d. removing the pressure applied to each punch in order that the surface deformation to the part is reversible; e. constructing a curve for each punch from the force (F e1 ) data representing the relation between the main stresses as a function of depth; and f. constructing an envelope-curve over each of said curves in step (e) whereby said envelope-curve represents the elastic limit of the part as a function of the depth.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 171 words
A non-destructive testing method for determining the elastic limit of a body or part as a function of depth suitable for a part having been subjected to surface treatment comprising: a. subjecting the surface of said part to an increasing pressure exerted by a series of punches, each punch having a contact surface with a different radii of curvature; b. measuring the deformation in the vicinity of the punch of the surface of said part for each punch pressure; c. measuring the force (F e1 ) at which the deformation for each punch ceases to be elastic; d. removing the pressure applied to each punch in order that the surface deformation to the part is reversible; e. constructing a curve for each punch from the force (F e1 ) data representing the relation between the main stresses as a function of depth; and f. constructing an envelope-curve over each of said curves in step (e) whereby said envelope-curve represents the elastic limit of the part as a function of the depth.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 45 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the elastic limit at given depths is determined by selecting the values of the radii of curvature of said punches so that the maxima of the curves representing said relation between the stresses are located at said given depths.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 11 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said punches are hemispherically shaped.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 28 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the relation used in constructing said curve for each punch from said force data (F e1 ) is the Tresca plasticity criterion.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the relation used in constructing said curve for each punch from said force data (F e1 ) is the Von Mises plasticity criterion.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 211 words
A non-destructive testing method for determining in situ by means of a given plasticity criterion unknown elastic or residual stresses to which a part of material having only slight work-hardening properties remains subjected during the testing steps, comprising: a. exerting a compression force at one point of said part by means of an exterior punch to deform said part at said point and to super-impose an elastic stress having known characteristics onto said unknown stresses; b. increasing said compression force up to the proportionality limit of said part beyond which the deformation of said part in the vicinity of said point is no longer proportional to the total stresses applied to said part; c. measuring the force (F e1 ) at which the deformation for said punch ceases to be elastic; d. removing the pressure applied to said punch in order that the surface deformation of the part is reversible; e. determining from said given plasticity criterion and from said measured force (F e1 ) and said elastic stress having known characteristics a relationship with the unknown elastic or residual stresses; and f. determining the unknown elastic or residual stresses from said relationship from given equilibrium equations for said part and from given boundary conditions at the periphery of said part.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 211 words
A non-destructive testing method for determining in situ by means of a given plasticity criterion unknown elastic or residual stresses to which a part of material having only slight work-hardening properties remains subjected during the testing steps, comprising: a. exerting a compression force at one point of said part by means of an exterior punch to deform said part at said point and to super-impose an elastic stress having known characteristics onto said unknown stresses; b. increasing said compression force up to the proportionality limit of said part beyond which the deformation of said part in the vicinity of said point is no longer proportional to the total stresses applied to said part; c. measuring the force (F e1 ) at which the deformation for said punch ceases to be elastic; d. removing the pressure applied to said punch in order that the surface deformation of the part is reversible; e. determining from said given plasticity criterion and from said measured force (F e1 ) and said elastic stress having known characteristics a relationship with the unknown elastic or residual stresses; and f. determining the unknown elastic or residual stresses from said relationship from given equilibrium equations for said part and from given boundary conditions at the periphery of said part.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 6, further comprising exerting successively several different compression forces by punches of various radii of curvature at the same point of the part to obtain the proportionality limit in the part for each punch.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 66 words
The method of claim 7, wherein said punches are hemispherical and said method comprises the further steps of constructing a series of curves graphically expressing the total stress field for each punch used, constructing an envelope-curve for said series of curves and applying said given plasticity criterion in conjunction with said envelope-curve to determine the value of the largest residual stress as a function of depth.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 56 words
The method of claim 6, wherein three different compression forces are successively applied with a given punch to the same point of the part after rotating the given punch each time about its own axis by a given angle so that the proportionality limit is just reached each time in the vicinity of the part's surface.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 9, wherein the punch is made to rotate 45° each time.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said punch is ellipsoidal in shape.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said punch is cylindrical in shape.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 83 words
The method of claim 6, wherein three different compression forces are successively exerted at the same point of the part by means of a given punch following rotation of said punch about its axis by a given angle in such a manner that the proportionality limit is just reached each time in the vicinity of the part's surface, and wherein a plasticity criterion is applied three times to the total field obtained in order to deduce three relations for determining the residual stresses.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 15 words
The method of claim 13, wherein said punch is made to rotate once by 90°.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said punch is ellipsoidal in shape.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said punch is cylindrical in shape.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 12 words
The method of claim 14, wherein said punch is hemispheric in shape.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 95 words
A non-destructive testing method suitable for a part having been subjected to surface treatment comprising: subjecting the surface of said part to an increasing pressure force exerted by a series of punches, each punch having a contact surface with a different radius of curvature; measuring the pressure force exerted by each punch at which deformation of said part ceases to be elastic; and determining the variations in the elastic limit of said part as a function of depth from said measured pressure force for each of said punches exerting a pressure force on said part.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 95 words
A non-destructive testing method suitable for a part having been subjected to surface treatment comprising: subjecting the surface of said part to an increasing pressure force exerted by a series of punches, each punch having a contact surface with a different radius of curvature; measuring the pressure force exerted by each punch at which deformation of said part ceases to be elastic; and determining the variations in the elastic limit of said part as a function of depth from said measured pressure force for each of said punches exerting a pressure force on said part.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US1312805A Cited
US1825387A Cited
US1781002A Cited
US2377590A Cited
US3106837A Cited
US3763697A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1979-07-20 1980-01-19 1980-07-20 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1983-07-20 1984-01-19 1984-07-20 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1987-07-20 1988-01-19 1988-07-20 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag