US3954944A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Fine silicas
Assignee: Ineos Silicas Ltd
•
Filing: 1973-03-08
•
Granted: 1976-05-04
•
Expires: 1993-03-08
Abstract
Abstract This invention discloses a new form of wet precipitated silica which is characterised in terms of energy required to breakdown particles and a defined thickening effect. A multistage precipitation and flocculation production process is also disclosed in which primary silica particles are prepared and flocculated using an alkali metal salt solution and further silica precipitated in the presence of the salt, the pH of the mixture reduced and the silica isolated, purified carefully dried and optionally milled.
Inventors
- 👤 Derek Aldcroft
- 👤 Donald Barby
- 👤 Anthony Leonard Lovell
- 👤 James Philip Quinn
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 23:29
CPC Classifications
C; C01; C01B; C01B33/00; C01B33/113; C01B33/12; C01B33/18; C01B33/187; C01B33/193; C01P; C01P2004/00; C01P2004/50; C01P2004/51; C01P2004/60; C01P2004/61; C01P2004/62; C01P2006/00; C01P2006/12; C01P2006/22
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 4
Claim 1
Independent Claim
233 words
A precipitated silica having: a. an ignition weight loss of at least 3% between 120°C and 1000°C, b. a strength such that a sample of the silica having a weight mean particle size on a substantially unimodal distribution in the size range 10-20 microns requires less than 6500 joules of ultrasonic energy to reduce the weight mean particle size of the sample to below 3 microns, said sample comprising 0.05 grams of said silica in 100 ml. of a 1 percent aqueous saline solution containing 0.1 percent sodium azide, and c. after fluid energy milling, a rheological performance index of at least 7, said rheological performance index being determined by subjecting each of a plurality of samples of the milled silica dispersed in a heavy mineral oil (having a specific gravity of 0.880 to 0.900 at 60°F. and a Saybolt viscosity of 360/390 at 100°F.) to varying shear force rates to determine shear stress as a function of shear rate and to determine the apparent yield stress for the system comprising the silica dispersed in said heavy mineral oil, said samples containing a weight percent silica different from the weight percent silica in the other samples, and determining the slope of the line formed by plotting the apparent yield stress as a function of the cube of the weight percent silica in each of said samples, said slope defining the rheological performance index.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
233 words
A precipitated silica having: a. an ignition weight loss of at least 3% between 120°C and 1000°C, b. a strength such that a sample of the silica having a weight mean particle size on a substantially unimodal distribution in the size range 10-20 microns requires less than 6500 joules of ultrasonic energy to reduce the weight mean particle size of the sample to below 3 microns, said sample comprising 0.05 grams of said silica in 100 ml. of a 1 percent aqueous saline solution containing 0.1 percent sodium azide, and c. after fluid energy milling, a rheological performance index of at least 7, said rheological performance index being determined by subjecting each of a plurality of samples of the milled silica dispersed in a heavy mineral oil (having a specific gravity of 0.880 to 0.900 at 60°F. and a Saybolt viscosity of 360/390 at 100°F.) to varying shear force rates to determine shear stress as a function of shear rate and to determine the apparent yield stress for the system comprising the silica dispersed in said heavy mineral oil, said samples containing a weight percent silica different from the weight percent silica in the other samples, and determining the slope of the line formed by plotting the apparent yield stress as a function of the cube of the weight percent silica in each of said samples, said slope defining the rheological performance index.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
175 words
A milled precipitated silica having: a. an ignition weight loss of at least 3% between 120°C. and 1000°C., b. a particle size distribution such that at least 30% by weight is less than 0.2 microns, and c. a rheological performance index of at least 7, said rheological performance index being determined by subjecting each of a plurality of samples of the milled silica dispersed in a heavy mineral oil (having a specific gravity of 0.880 to 0.900 at 60°F. and a Saybolt viscosity of 360/390 at 100°F.) to varying shear force rates to determine shear stress as a function of shear rate and to determine the apparent yield stress for the system comprising the silica dispersed in said heavy mineral oil, said samples containing a weight percent silica different from the weight percent silica in the other samples, and determining the slope of the line formed by plotting the apparent yield stress as a function of the cube of the weight percent silica in each of said samples said slope defining the rheological performance index.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
175 words
A milled precipitated silica having: a. an ignition weight loss of at least 3% between 120°C. and 1000°C., b. a particle size distribution such that at least 30% by weight is less than 0.2 microns, and c. a rheological performance index of at least 7, said rheological performance index being determined by subjecting each of a plurality of samples of the milled silica dispersed in a heavy mineral oil (having a specific gravity of 0.880 to 0.900 at 60°F. and a Saybolt viscosity of 360/390 at 100°F.) to varying shear force rates to determine shear stress as a function of shear rate and to determine the apparent yield stress for the system comprising the silica dispersed in said heavy mineral oil, said samples containing a weight percent silica different from the weight percent silica in the other samples, and determining the slope of the line formed by plotting the apparent yield stress as a function of the cube of the weight percent silica in each of said samples said slope defining the rheological performance index.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1979-05-04 | 1979-11-03 | 1980-05-04 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1983-05-04 | 1983-11-03 | 1984-05-04 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1987-05-04 | 1987-11-03 | 1988-05-04 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |