Patent US3816649A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US3816649A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Optical inspection

Assignee: National Research Development Corp UK
•
Filing: 1972-06-19
•
Granted: 1974-06-11
•
Expires: 1992-06-19
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An inspection system employing television techniques makes use of coherent optical phenomena. A comparison is made between two video signals each resulting from irradiation of a photosensitive screen with coherent light consisting of two interfering beams, the light of one beam having been scattered from a surface to be inspected and imaged on the screen. In studying deformation of a surface, the two signals are derived with the surface in different states. In comparing two similar surfaces, the two signals may be derived using light of different wavelengths, the two interfering beams consisting of light scattered respectively from the two surfaces.

Inventors

  • 👤 J Butters
  • 👤 J Leendertz

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-06 15:15
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01B; G01B11/00; G01B11/16; G01B11/161; G01B11/162; G01B11/164; G01B9/00; G01B9/02; G01B9/02094

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 30
Claim 1
Independent Claim 125 words
A method of optical inspection comprising: deriving two similar video signals respectively representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in two patterns of illumination each of which results from the irradiation of a photo-sensitive screen with coherent light consisting of first and second interfering beams, said first beam in each case being constituted by light scattered from a surface to be inspected and imaged on to the photo-sensitive screen and said second beam in each case having a form such that at every point in the relevant pattern of illumination the maximum angle between a ray of the first beam and a ray of the second beam is not greater than the maximum angle between rays of the first beam; and correlating said two video signals.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 125 words
A method of optical inspection comprising: deriving two similar video signals respectively representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in two patterns of illumination each of which results from the irradiation of a photo-sensitive screen with coherent light consisting of first and second interfering beams, said first beam in each case being constituted by light scattered from a surface to be inspected and imaged on to the photo-sensitive screen and said second beam in each case having a form such that at every point in the relevant pattern of illumination the maximum angle between a ray of the first beam and a ray of the second beam is not greater than the maximum angle between rays of the first beam; and correlating said two video signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 43 words
A method according to claim 1, in which said two patterns of illumination are simultaneously formed respectively by means of light of two different wavelengths and respectively on two different photo-sensitive screens by means of which said two video signals are respectively derived.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 35 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the correlation comprises deriving a unidirectional signal whose magnitude varies in accordance with the strength of the alternating components of the difference between said two video signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 38 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the result of the correlation is itself displayed as a television picture whose brightness varies from point to point in accordance with the differences between said two patterns of illumination.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method according to claim 1, in which the imaging of the light is effected using an aperture not greater than f/5.6.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 80 words
A method according to claim 1, applied to the comparison of two nominally identical surfaces, in which each pattern of illumination is formed by two beams of light respectively scattered from the two surfaces and imaged in a similar manner on to a photo-sensitive screen, the two patterns of illumination being respectively formed under conditions which differ in respect of the optical (but not the geometrical) path lengths between the photo-sensitive screen and the two surfaces but are otherwise identical.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 40 words
A method according to claim 6, in which the said patterns of illumination are formed successively on the same photo-sensitive screen, the correlation being effected between the video signal as derived and a delayed version of the other video signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method according to claim 6, in which said two patterns of illumination are formed respectively by means of light of two different wavelengths.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 32 words
A method according to claim 8, in which said two patterns of illumination are respectively formed simultaneously on two different photo-sensitive screens by means of which two video signals are respectively derived.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 40 words
A method according to claim 1, in which said two patterns of illumination are formed successively in the same manner on the same photo-sensitive screen, the correlation being effected using a recorded version of the first signal to be derived.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 24 words
A method according to claim 10, in which said two patterns of illumination are formed respectively by means of light of two different wavelengths.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 50 words
A method according to claim 10, in which said two patterns of illumination are formed using light of the same wavelength respectively before and after a change in the state of an object of which said surface forms part, said second Beam being the same for both patterns of illumination.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 36 words
A method according to claim 12, in which said second beam is constituted by light scattered from a different surface and imaged on to the photo-sensitive screen in the same manner as for said first beam.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method according to claim 12, in which said second beam has a smooth wavefront such that the beam diverges from an effective point source disposed at a position optically equivalent to the centre of the optical system used for imaging the light of said first beam.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 179 words
Apparatus for use in optical inspection, the apparatus comprising: a television camera operative to generate video signals representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in patterns of illumination formed on at least one photo-sensitive screen incorporated in the camera, the camera further incorporating an optical system for imaging on to said at least one screen light from surfaces viewed by the camera; illuminating means operative when a surface is viewed by said camera to irradiate each photo-sensitive screen incorporated in said camera with coherent light consisting of two interfering beams a first of which is constituted by light scattered from said surface and imaged on to the screen by said optical system and the second of which has a form such that at every point in the pattern of illumination formed on the screen by said two interfering beams the maximum angle between a ray of the first beam and a ray of the second beam is not greater than the maximum angle between rays of the first beam; and means for correlating two video signals derived from said camera.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 179 words
Apparatus for use in optical inspection, the apparatus comprising: a television camera operative to generate video signals representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in patterns of illumination formed on at least one photo-sensitive screen incorporated in the camera, the camera further incorporating an optical system for imaging on to said at least one screen light from surfaces viewed by the camera; illuminating means operative when a surface is viewed by said camera to irradiate each photo-sensitive screen incorporated in said camera with coherent light consisting of two interfering beams a first of which is constituted by light scattered from said surface and imaged on to the screen by said optical system and the second of which has a form such that at every point in the pattern of illumination formed on the screen by said two interfering beams the maximum angle between a ray of the first beam and a ray of the second beam is not greater than the maximum angle between rays of the first beam; and means for correlating two video signals derived from said camera.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 47 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which said illuminating means is operative so that said second beam has a smooth wavefront such that the beam diverges from an effective point source disposed at a position optically equivalent to the centre of the aperture of said optical system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 54 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which there are provided means enabling said camera to view two similar surfaces simultaneously in a similar manner, said illuminating means being operative to illuminate the two surfaces in a similar manner, whereby said two interfering beams will be constituted by light respectively scattered from the two surfaces.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 18 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which the aperture of said optical system is not greater than f/5.6.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 17 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which said illuminating means is operative at two different light wavelengths.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 27 words
Apparatus according to claim 19, in which said television camera incorporates two photo-sensitive screens, and means rendering said screens respectively responsive to light of said two wavelengths.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 33 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which said camera incorporates only a single photo-sensitive screen, and the correlating means is operative to correlate two video signals derived from said camera at different times.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 41 words
Apparatus according to claim 21, in which said correlating means comprises means for recording the video signal which is derived at the earlier of said different times, and means for utilising the recorded version of that signal in effecting the correlation.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 37 words
Apparatus according to claim 15, in which the correlating means comprises means for deriving a unidirectional signal whose magnitude varies in accordance with the strength of the alternating components of the difference between said two video signals.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 28 words
Apparatus according to claim 23, comprising a cathode ray tube monitor operative in synchronism with said television camera, and means for applying said unidirectional signal to said monitor.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 124 words
Apparatus for use in the optical comparison of two nominally identical surfaces, the apparatus comprising: a television camera operative to generate two video signals respectively representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in two patterns of illumination formed respectively by light of two different wavelengths on at least onE photo-sensitive screen incorporated in the camera, the camera further incorporating an optical system for imaging on to said at least one screen light from surfaces viewed by the camera; means for enabling the camera to view two surfaces to be compared in a similar manner; means for illuminating said two surfaces, while they are so viewed, in a similar manner with coherent light of said two different wavelengths; and means for correlating said two video signals.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 124 words
Apparatus for use in the optical comparison of two nominally identical surfaces, the apparatus comprising: a television camera operative to generate two video signals respectively representing the point-by-point variations of intensity in two patterns of illumination formed respectively by light of two different wavelengths on at least onE photo-sensitive screen incorporated in the camera, the camera further incorporating an optical system for imaging on to said at least one screen light from surfaces viewed by the camera; means for enabling the camera to view two surfaces to be compared in a similar manner; means for illuminating said two surfaces, while they are so viewed, in a similar manner with coherent light of said two different wavelengths; and means for correlating said two video signals.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 36 words
Apparatus according to claim 25, in which said television camera is operative to generate said two video signals simultaneously, the camera incorporating two photo-sensitive screens by means of which said two video signals are respectively derived.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 44 words
Apparatus according to claim 25, in which said television camera is operative to generate said two video signals alternately, and the correlating means is operative to effect the correlation between one video signal as derived and a delayed version of the other video signal.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1977-06-10 1977-12-10 1978-06-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1981-06-10 1981-12-10 1982-06-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1985-06-10 1985-12-10 1986-06-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag