Patent US3947258A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US3812353A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for determining formation parameters

Assignee: ConocoPhillips Co
•
Filing: 1971-10-06
•
Granted: 1974-05-21
•
Expires: 1991-10-06
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for determining formation parameters such as the effective porosity ( phi e), the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) and the formation matrix capture cross section ( Sigma ma), utilizing predetermined thermal neutron capture cross sections of a first and a second injected fluid, and the thermal neutron capture cross sections of the formation flooded with the first injected fluid and subsequently flooded with the second injected fluid to determine the formation effective porosity ( phi e); and subsequently utilizing the determined values of the effective porosity ( phi e) and the formation neutron porosity ( phi n) and the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh) to determine the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ); the determined values of ( phi e) and ( Rho ) being utilized to determine the formation matrix cross section ( Sigma ma). The method of the present invention thus provides determined data for calibrating the tool response of a gamma ray type logging tool.

Inventors

  • 👤 J Gilchrist

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 17:42
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V5/00; G01V5/04; G01V5/08; G01V5/10

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim 172 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2); determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1) and ( Sigma 2); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n); determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho phi n phi e/ phi sh.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 172 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2); determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1) and ( Sigma 2); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n); determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho phi n phi e/ phi sh.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 85 words
The method of claim 1 defined further to include the steps of: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1) ); and determining the formation matrix capture cross section ( Sigma ma) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho ma ( Sigma r -( Rho ) ( Sigma sh)/1 - Rho ).
Claim 4
Independent Claim 322 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation utilizing field determined data obtained from the tool responses of logging tools run in a borehole in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); injecting the first injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the first injected fluid; running a first logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1) utilizing the tool response of the first logging tool; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); injecting the second injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the second injected fluid; running a second logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the fOrmation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2) utilizing the tool response of the second logging tool; determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1), and ( Sigma 2); and determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation in the formation zone of interest of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1)).
Claim 5
Independent Claim 322 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation utilizing field determined data obtained from the tool responses of logging tools run in a borehole in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); injecting the first injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the first injected fluid; running a first logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1) utilizing the tool response of the first logging tool; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); injecting the second injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the second injected fluid; running a second logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the fOrmation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2) utilizing the tool response of the second logging tool; determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1), and ( Sigma 2); and determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation in the formation zone of interest of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1)).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 127 words
The method of claim 3 defined further to include the steps of: running a third logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation neutron porosity ( phi n) and indicative of the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the tool response of the third logging tool; determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the tool response of the third logging tool; and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the determined values of ( phi n), ( phi sh) and ( phi e).
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 90 words
The method of claim 4 defined further to include the step of: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1) ); and determining the formation matrix capture cross section ( Sigma ma) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma ma ( Sigma r - ( Rho ) ( Sigma sh)/ 1 -Rho ).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 36 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale is defined further as being determined utilizing the following algebraic expression: Rho ( phi n - phi e)/ phi sh .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 50 words
The method of claim 6 defined further to include the step of: calibrating the tool response of a Gamma Ray Logging tool utilizing the determined values of the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) to calibrate the deviation of the Gamma Ray Logging tool response.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1977-05-20 1977-11-19 1978-05-21 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1981-05-20 1981-11-19 1982-05-21 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1985-05-20 1985-11-19 1986-05-21 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag