Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
172 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2); determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1) and ( Sigma 2); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n); determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho phi n phi e/ phi sh.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
172 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2); determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1) and ( Sigma 2); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n); determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho phi n phi e/ phi sh.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
85 words
The method of claim 1 defined further to include the steps of: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1) ); and determining the formation matrix capture cross section ( Sigma ma) utilizing the algebraic expression: Rho ma ( Sigma r -( Rho ) ( Sigma sh)/1 - Rho ).
Claim 4
Independent Claim
322 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation utilizing field determined data obtained from the tool responses of logging tools run in a borehole in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); injecting the first injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the first injected fluid; running a first logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1) utilizing the tool response of the first logging tool; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); injecting the second injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the second injected fluid; running a second logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the fOrmation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2) utilizing the tool response of the second logging tool; determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1), and ( Sigma 2); and determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation in the formation zone of interest of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1)).
Claim 5
Independent Claim
322 words
A method for determining formation parameters at predetermined depths in a borehole in a zone of interest in the formation utilizing field determined data obtained from the tool responses of logging tools run in a borehole in the formation, the method comprising: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a first injected fluid ( Sigma w1); injecting the first injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the first injected fluid; running a first logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest flooded with the first injected fluid ( Sigma 1) utilizing the tool response of the first logging tool; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of a second injected fluid ( Sigma w2); injecting the second injected fluid in the formation zone of interest to substantially flood the formation zone of interest with the second injected fluid; running a second logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the fOrmation thermal neutron capture cross section; determining the thermal neutron capture cross section in the formation zone of interest flooded with the second injected fluid ( Sigma 2) utilizing the tool response of the second logging tool; determining the effective porosity ( phi e) at predetermined borehole depths in the formation zone of interest utilizing the determined values of ( Sigma w1), ( Sigma w2), ( Sigma 1), and ( Sigma 2); and determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation in the formation zone of interest of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1)).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
127 words
The method of claim 3 defined further to include the steps of: running a third logging tool in the borehole in the formation having a tool response indicative of the formation neutron porosity ( phi n) and indicative of the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh); determining the formation neutron porosity ( phi n) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the tool response of the third logging tool; determining the porosity of the shale component of the formation ( phi sh) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the tool response of the third logging tool; and determining the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) utilizing the determined values of ( phi n), ( phi sh) and ( phi e).
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
90 words
The method of claim 4 defined further to include the step of: determining the thermal neutron capture cross section of the formation and shale ( Sigma r) utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma r ( Sigma 1 Sigma w2 - Sigma 2 Sigma w1/( Sigma w2 - Sigma w1) - ( Sigma 2 - Sigma 1) ); and determining the formation matrix capture cross section ( Sigma ma) at predetermined borehole depths utilizing the algebraic expression: Sigma ma ( Sigma r - ( Rho ) ( Sigma sh)/ 1 -Rho ).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale is defined further as being determined utilizing the following algebraic expression: Rho ( phi n - phi e)/ phi sh .
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 6 defined further to include the step of: calibrating the tool response of a Gamma Ray Logging tool utilizing the determined values of the formation fraction of bulk volume that is shale ( Rho ) to calibrate the deviation of the Gamma Ray Logging tool response.