Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 49
Claim 1
Independent Claim
34 words
1 . A method comprising: analyzing a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and rating the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
34 words
1 . A method comprising: analyzing a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and rating the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
15 words
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mobile content is a website.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
3 words
3 . (canceled)
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
3 words
3 . (canceled)
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mobile content is an advertisement.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
5 words
5 - 6 . (canceled)
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
5 words
5 - 6 . (canceled)
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mobile content is at least one of a video file, video download, video stream, audio file, audio download, audio stream, text file, and text information.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
18 words
8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein compatibility is based at least in part on usability.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
21 words
9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is processing speed.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
21 words
10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is cache size.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is resolution.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is multimedia capability.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
21 words
13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a manufacturer.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
21 words
14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is model type.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
21 words
15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a display.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
22 words
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a CPU model.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
22 words
17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is an audio capability.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
23 words
18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type is a phone client application.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
5 words
19 - 22 . (canceled)
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
5 words
19 - 22 . (canceled)
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
16 words
23 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with a mimetype.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
5 words
24 - 25 . (canceled)
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
5 words
24 - 25 . (canceled)
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
19 words
26 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with a mobile communication facility identifier.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
19 words
27 . The method of claim 26 , wherein the mobile communication facility identifier is an user agent string.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
5 words
28 - 38 . (canceled)
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
5 words
28 - 38 . (canceled)
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
21 words
39 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with a Wireless Universal Resource File (WURFL) criterion.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
18 words
40 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with a on a browser.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
17 words
41 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with an operating system.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
18 words
42 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the criterion is associated with an element of usability.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
5 words
43 - 73 . (canceled)
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
5 words
43 - 73 . (canceled)
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
29 words
74 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the compatibility of the mobile content with the criterion is presented to an owner of the mobile content for review.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
5 words
75 - 79 . (canceled)
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
5 words
75 - 79 . (canceled)
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
15 words
80 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the rating is a continuous score.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
15 words
81 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the rating is a binary categorization.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
3 words
82 . (canceled)
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
3 words
82 . (canceled)
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
32 words
83 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the rating is used at least in part to determine if the mobile content may be displayed on a mobile communication facility type.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
20 words
84 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the rating is used to determine a rank for mobile content.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
32 words
85 . The method of claim 84 , wherein a priority for presentation of the mobile content to the mobile communication facility type is based at least in part on the rank.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
44 words
86 . A system comprising: an analysis facility adapted to analyze a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and a rating facility adapted to rate the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
44 words
86 . A system comprising: an analysis facility adapted to analyze a mobile content for compatibility with a criterion associated with a mobile communication facility type; and a rating facility adapted to rate the mobile content based at least in part on the compatibility.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
5 words
87 - 170 . (canceled)
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
5 words
87 - 170 . (canceled)