Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 53
Claim 1
Independent Claim
174 words
Adaptive blind equalization method for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics variable in time which introduce an intersymbol interference, said reception taking place by means of a reception device comprising a filter with adaptable parameters at the output of which there are signal samples, a decision element which assigns to each signal sample a symbol, and a control device which on the basis of a pilot vector of the received signal, of the signal samples and of the decided symbols regulates the adaptable parameters of the filter until there is reached an optimal configuration which gives the least intersymbol interference characterized in that said optimal configuration of the parameters (c n+1 ) ) of the filter (1) which gives the least intersymbol interference is obtained by minimizing a cost function by means of self-decided symbols (a ) of the decision element (4) without knowledge n of the symbols actually transmitted and of the signal samples (z ) available at the filter output (1). n
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
174 words
Adaptive blind equalization method for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics variable in time which introduce an intersymbol interference, said reception taking place by means of a reception device comprising a filter with adaptable parameters at the output of which there are signal samples, a decision element which assigns to each signal sample a symbol, and a control device which on the basis of a pilot vector of the received signal, of the signal samples and of the decided symbols regulates the adaptable parameters of the filter until there is reached an optimal configuration which gives the least intersymbol interference characterized in that said optimal configuration of the parameters (c n+1 ) ) of the filter (1) which gives the least intersymbol interference is obtained by minimizing a cost function by means of self-decided symbols (a ) of the decision element (4) without knowledge n of the symbols actually transmitted and of the signal samples (z ) available at the filter output (1). n
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said cost function is the mean square error existing between said self-decided symbols (â) n and said signal samples (z n ).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said cost function is the peak distortion existing between said self-decided symbols (a ) n and said signal samples (z n ).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that the delay introduced by each of the delay lines of said filter (1) is equal to the signal transmission time and thus produces a synchronous signal equalization.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
42 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that the delay introduced by each of the delay lines of said filter (1) is smaller than the signal transmission time, thus producing an equalization of signals with fractionary spacing cells.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 5 characterized in that the delay introduced by each of the delay lines of said filter (1) is equal to half the signal transmission time.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
53 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said optimal configuration of the parameters (c 1) of the filter (1) which minimizes the intersymbol interference is obtained by successive approximations and in that for some iterations adaptation of the parameters (c 1) of the filter (1) is not accomplished.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
46 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 7 characterized in that said iterations in which adaptation of the parameters (c 1) of the filter (1) is not accomplished are decided on the basis of the value assumed by a binary consent function (f n ).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 8 characterized in that said binary consent function (f ) is constructed by comparing the sign of a self-decided n error (e ) with the sign of a reference error (e ). n n
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
72 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 9 characterized in that said self-decided error sign (ê n ) is obtained by comparing the signal samples (z n ) with n n the self-decided symbols (a ) while said reference error n sign (e ) is obtained by comparing the signal samples (z ) n n with a reference point ( n βsgnz n ) of the space of the n symbols.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
27 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said electrical signals codified in symbols are transmitted on two carriers at the same frequency.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
21 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 11 characterized in that said carriers at the same frequency are in quadrature.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
19 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 12 characterized in that said carriers in quadrature are amplitude modulated.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
19 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 13 characterized in that the number of said symbols is 16.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 13 characterized in that the number of said symbols is 64.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
19 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 13 characterized in that the number of said symbols is 256.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
35 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claims 8 and 13 characterized in that said binary consent function (f n ) has a real part (f n,R ) and an imaginary part (f n,I ).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
63 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 17 characterized in that said real part (f n,R ) and imaginary part (fn 1) of said binary consent function (f ) n, act independently of each other thus providing for adaptation of the real part and the imaginary part respectively of the parameters (c n+1 ) of the filter (1) independently of each other.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
61 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 17 characterized in that said real part (f n,R ) and imaginary part (f n,I ) of said binary consent function (f n ) act together thus providing for adaptation of the real part and imaginary part respectively of the parameters (c 1) of the filter (1) only when both give consent simultaneously.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
114 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 17 characterized in that said real part (f n,R ) of the binary consent function (f ) is constructed by comparing the n sign of the real part (ê n,R ) of a self-decided error with the sign of the real part (e n,R ) of a reference error (e n ) while said imaginary part (f n,I ) ) of the binary consent function (f ) is constructed by comparing the sign of the n imaginary part (ê n,I ) of a self-decided error (e ) with the n, n sign of the imaginary part (e n,I ) of a reference error (e n ).
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
210 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 20 characterized in that said sign of the real part (ê n,R ) of the self-decided error (ê n ) is obtained by n comparing the real part (z n,R ) of said signal samples (z ) with the real part (â n,R ) of said self-decided symbols (â n ) n, n while said sign of the imaginary part (ê n,I ) of the self-decided error (e ) is obtained by comparing the n imaginary part (z n, I ) of said signal samples (z n ) with the imaginary part (â n,I ) of said self-decided symbols (â n ) and n, n the fact that said sign of the real part (e n,R ) of the reference error (e n ) is obtained by comparing the real part (z n,R ) of said signal samples (z ) with a reference point n ( n sgnz n ) of the symbol constellation plane while said sign of the imaginary part (e n,I ) of the reference error (e n ) is obtained by comparing the imaginary part (zn,I) ) of said signal samples (z ) with a reference point (β Ssgnz ) of the n n n symbol constellation plane.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
62 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said reception device comprises a second decision feedback filter (2) with adaptable parameters (g n+1 ) and that said parameters (g n+1 ) are adjusted until there is reached an optimal configuration having minimal intersymbol interference by minimization of said cost function constructed with said self-decided symbols (â n ).
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
64 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said reception device comprises an automatic gain control block (6) and a carrier phase recovery block (7) of which the gain (G ) and phase n (Φ) respectively are adjusted until there is reached an n optimal configuration by minimization of said cost function constructed with said self-decided symbols (â n ).
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
21 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said pilot vector (x ) is limited in amplitude.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 1 characterized in that said pilot vector (x ) is replaced by a vector made up of the signs of its components.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
23 words
Adaptive blind equalization method in accordance with claim 9 characterized in that said self-decided error (e ) n is replaced by its sign.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
101 words
Adaptive blind equalization device for the reception of electrical signals codified into symbols comprising a filter with adaptable parameters at the output of which there are signal samples, a decision element which assigns a symbol to each signal sample, and a control block which on the basis of a pilot vector of the signals received, if the signal samples and of the decided symbols regulates the adaptable parameters of the filter characterized in that said control block (5) comprises a first multiplier (28) which at each iteration enables or inhibits adaptation of the parameters (c n+1 ) of the filter (1).
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
101 words
Adaptive blind equalization device for the reception of electrical signals codified into symbols comprising a filter with adaptable parameters at the output of which there are signal samples, a decision element which assigns a symbol to each signal sample, and a control block which on the basis of a pilot vector of the signals received, if the signal samples and of the decided symbols regulates the adaptable parameters of the filter characterized in that said control block (5) comprises a first multiplier (28) which at each iteration enables or inhibits adaptation of the parameters (c n+1 ) of the filter (1).
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
57 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 27 characterized in that it comprises a second decision feedback filter (2) with adaptable parameters (g n+1 ) and that said control block (5) comprises a second multiplier (29) which at each iteraton enables or inhibits adaptation of the parameters (g n+1 ) of the decision feedback filter (2).
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
73 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 27 characterized in that it comprises an automatic gain control block (6) and a carrier phases recovery block (7) and that said control block (5) comprises a third multiplier (30) which at each iteration enables or inhibits adaptation of the gain (G ) of the automatic gain control n block (6) and the phase (¢_) of the phase recovery block of n the carrier (7).
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
39 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 27 characterized in that said first multiplier (28) receives at one of its inputs a binary consent signal (f n ·ê n ) generated by a fourth multiplier (23). n n
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
53 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 30 characterized in that said fourth multiplier (23) receives at a first input a self-decided error signal (e ) n coming from a first adder (10) and at a second input a binary consent function (f ) coming from a first decision n block (26).
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
49 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 31 characterized in that said first decision block (26) receives at its input the output signal of a fifth multiplier (20) which in turn receives at its inputs the output signals of a first (18) and second (22) sign calculation block.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
35 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 32 characterized in that said first sign calculation block (18) receives at its input a reference error signal (e ) generated by a second adder (11). n
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
45 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 33 characterized in that said second adder (11) receives at its noninverting input a signal sample (z ) n coming from said filter (1) and at its inverting input the output signal of a sixth multiplier (15).
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
43 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 34 characterized in that said sixth multiplier (15) receives at its inputs the output of a third sign calculation block (12) and the output of a block (17) generator of a real quantity (S ).
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
33 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 35 characterized in that said third sign calculation block (12) receives at its output a signal sample (z ) n coming from said filter (1).
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
49 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 31 characterized in that said first adder (10) receives at its inverting input a self-decided symbol (e ) n coming from said decision device (4) and at its noninverting input a signal sample (z ) coming from said filter (1). n
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
59 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 37 characterized in that said first multiplier (28) receives at one of its inputs a binary consent signal made up of a real part (f n,R · ê n,R ) generated by a fourth multiplier (23) and an imaginary part (f n,I ·ê n,I ) generated by a seventh multiplier (25).
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
127 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 38 characterized in that said fourth multiplier (23) receives at a first input a real part signal (e n,R ) of a self-decided error (e ) coming from a first adder (10) and n at a second input a real part signal (f n,R ) of a binary consent function (f ) coming from a first decision block n (26) and that said seventh multiplier (25) receives at a first input an imaginary part signal ê n,I ) of a self-decided error (e ) coming from a first adder (10) and at a second n input an imaginary part signal (f n,I ) ) of a binary consent function (f ) coming from a second decision block (27). n
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
90 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 39 characterized in that said first decision block (26) receives at its input the output signal of a fifth multiplier (20) which in turn receives at its inputs the output signals of a first (18) and a second (22) sign calculation block and that the second decision block (27) receives at its input the output signal of an eighth multiplier (21) which in turn receives at its inputs the output signals of a fourth (19) and a fifth (24) sign calculation block.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
76 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 40 characterized in that said first sign calculation block (18) receives at its input a real part signal (e n,R ) ) of a reference error (e ) generated by a second adder (11) n and that said fourth sign calculation block (19) receives at its input an imaginary part signal (e n,I ) ) of a reference error (e ) generated by a third adder (13). n
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
95 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 41 characterized in that said second adder (11) receives at its noninverting input the real part (z n,R ) of a signal sample (z ) coming from said filter (1) and at its n inverting input the output signal of a sixth multiplier (15) and that said third adder (13) receives at its noninverting input the imaginary part (z n,I ) of a signal sample (z n ) n coming from said filter (1) and at its inverting input the output signal of a ninth multiplier (16).
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
77 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 42 characterized in that said sixth multiplier (15) receives at its inputs the output of a third sign calculation block (12) and the output of a block (17) generator of a real quantity (β) and that said ninth multiplier (16) n receives at its inputs the output of a sixth sign calculation block (14) and the output of a block (17) generator of a real quantity (β n ).
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
71 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 43 characterized in that said third sign calculation block (12) receives at its input the real part (z n,R ) of a signal sample (z ) coming from said filter (1) and that said n sixth sign calculation block (14) receives at its input the imaginary part (z n,I ) ) of a signal sample (z n ) coming from said filter (1).
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
108 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 31 characterized in that said first adder (10) receives at its inverting input a self-decided symbol (â) made up of a real part (â n,R ) and an imaginary part (â n,I ) ) coming from said decision device (4) and at its noninverting input a signal sample (z ) made up also of a real part n (z n,R and an imaginary part (z n,I ) coming from said filter (1) and generates at its output a self-decided error signal (ê n ) made up of a real part (ê n,R ) and of imaginary part (ê n,I ).
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
53 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 27 characterized in that said first multiplier (28) receives at one of its inputs a pilot vector (x ) and that upstream from said first multiplier (28) is inserted a limiter which limits the amplitude of the individual components of the pilot vector (x ).
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
50 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 27 characterized in that said first multiplier (28) receives at one of its inputs a pilot vector (x ) and that upstream from said first multiplier (28) is inserted a seventh sign calculation block which extracts the pilot vector sign (x ).
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
34 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 31 characterized in that upstream from said fourth multiplier (23) is inserted an eighth sign calculation block which extracts the self-decided error sign (ê n ).
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
53 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with one of claims 27 to 48 inclusive characterized in that said multipliers (15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 28, 29, 30), said adders (10, 11, 13), said sign calculation blocks (12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 24) and said decision block (26, 27) are accomplished with analog components.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
53 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with one of claims 27 to 48 inclusive characterized in that said multipliers (15, 16, 20, 21, 23, 28, 29, 30), said adders (10, 11, 13), said sign calculation blocks (12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 24) and said decision block (26, 27) are accomplished with digital components.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
23 words
Adaptive blind equalization device in accordance with claim 50 characterized in that said digital components are implemented in one or more integrated circuits.