Patent EP0231028A2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
EP0231028A2 Expired / Lapsed EP ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

High contrast low metal ion photoresist developing method and composition

Assignee: Shin Etsu MicroSi Inc
•
Filing: 1987-01-29
•
Granted: —
•
Expires: 2007-01-29
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A novel low metal ion developer composition used in a two step process which provided high contrast images and long developer bath life is provided. The process gives high contrast images. The substrate coated with positive photoresist is exposed then immersed in a "predip" bath, rinsed, and then, immersed in the developer bath, rinsed and dried. This process provided high contrast which does not decrease over the life of the developer system. The system consists of 1) a predip solution containing aqueous non-metal ion organic base and a cationic surfactant adjusted to a concentration that does not give development, and 2) a developer solution containing an aqueous solution of an non-metal ion organic base and a fluorochemical surfactant adjusted to a concentration that provides development. The high contrast is achieved by the cationic surfactant coating the resist and inhibiting the attack on the unexposed resist by the developer while permitting the developer to dissolve away the exposed resist.

Inventors

  • 👤 James Marvin Lewis
  • 👤 Andrew Joseph Blakeney

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction EP
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-25 12:44
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03C; G03C5/00; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/26; G03F7/30; G03F7/32; G03F7/322

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 31
Claim 1
Independent Claim 272 words
A process for developing a positive radiation sensitive resist film comprised of quinone diazide sulfonic acid derivatives and alkali soluble resin that has been coated on a substrate and exposed to radiation to form a surface relief pattern which comprises: (a) contacting the exposed film with a solution comprising an organic base aqueous solution adjusted to a concentration that does not give development of the photoresist and containing a cationic surfactant from about 0.0001 to about 1.0% and more preferably from about 0.001 to about 0.75% and most preferably 0.01 to 0.25% by weight of the total solution. (b) subjecting said film to an aqueous rinse, and (c) contacting the said film with an organic aqueous base developer solution having a p H of at least 9 and containing from about 0.0001 to 5% and more preferably from about 0.001 to about 2% based on the weight of developer of a fluorocarbon surfactant having the formula: where Y is a a radical selected from the group -CH 2 CH 2 0-, -SO 2 NR-, -SO 3 -, -SO 2 N(R )CH 2 CO 2 -, -CO 2 - and -CO-NR I- wherein R f is either a straight or branched chain of the formula C p F 2p+1 where p is an integer of from 3-17 and wherein R is hydrogen or an acyl or alkyl radical of 1 to 30 carbon atoms and m is an integer of 2 to 26 and preferably where m is an integer of 5-2,6, and R is hydrogen or an alkyl radical of 1-6 carbon atoms until the exposed portions of the film are dissolved.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 272 words
A process for developing a positive radiation sensitive resist film comprised of quinone diazide sulfonic acid derivatives and alkali soluble resin that has been coated on a substrate and exposed to radiation to form a surface relief pattern which comprises: (a) contacting the exposed film with a solution comprising an organic base aqueous solution adjusted to a concentration that does not give development of the photoresist and containing a cationic surfactant from about 0.0001 to about 1.0% and more preferably from about 0.001 to about 0.75% and most preferably 0.01 to 0.25% by weight of the total solution. (b) subjecting said film to an aqueous rinse, and (c) contacting the said film with an organic aqueous base developer solution having a p H of at least 9 and containing from about 0.0001 to 5% and more preferably from about 0.001 to about 2% based on the weight of developer of a fluorocarbon surfactant having the formula: where Y is a a radical selected from the group -CH 2 CH 2 0-, -SO 2 NR-, -SO 3 -, -SO 2 N(R )CH 2 CO 2 -, -CO 2 - and -CO-NR I- wherein R f is either a straight or branched chain of the formula C p F 2p+1 where p is an integer of from 3-17 and wherein R is hydrogen or an acyl or alkyl radical of 1 to 30 carbon atoms and m is an integer of 2 to 26 and preferably where m is an integer of 5-2,6, and R is hydrogen or an alkyl radical of 1-6 carbon atoms until the exposed portions of the film are dissolved.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process in Claim 1 in which the organic base in Step (a) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process in Claim 1 in which the organic base in Step (a) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 118 words
The process of Claim 1 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises a compound selected from those having the formula: where R 3 is a cyclic group of from 2 to 6 carbons with from 0 to 3 heteroatoms chosen from the group 0, N and S provided that each heteroatom is not bonded to another or a quaternary nitrogen. R 1 are saturated or unsaturated, straight or branched hydrocarbon chains of from 6 to 20 carbons. R 2 is the same as R 1 except has 1 to 120 carbon atoms. X - may be Cl - ,I - , Br-, CH 3 SO 4 - or CH 3 CH 2 SO 4 - .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of Claim 4 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises:
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 73 words
The process of Claim 1 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises a compound selected from those having the formula: where R1 and R2 are as described above; R 3 is an alkyl group of between 1 and 4 carbons; and R 4 is a saturated or unsaturated straight or branched hydrocarbon chain of from 1 to 4 carbons or phenalkyl wherein the alkyl moiety has from 0 to 3 carbons.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of Claim 6 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises:
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 105 words
The process of Claim 1 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises a compound selected from those having the formula: where R 1 , R 2 , and R 3 are as described above. R 4 is a saturated or unsaturated straight or branched hydrocarbon chain containing 1 to 4 quaternary ammonium groups -(N + R 5 R 6 R 7 ) wherein R 5 is a saturated or unsaturated straight or branched hydrocarbon chain of from 1 to 20 carbons, R 6 and R 7 are the same or different and each is an alkyl group of from 1 to 4 carbons.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of Claim 8 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises:
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 47 words
The process of Claim 1 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises a compound selected from those having the formula: where R is a hydrocarbon chain derived from coconut oils. R 1 and R 2 are hydroxy alkyl groups containing between 1 and 4 carbons.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of Claim 10 in which the cationic surfactant in Step (a) comprises:
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 33 words
The process in Claim 1 in which the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0- ( CH 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process in Claim 1 in which the organic base in Step (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process in Claim 1 in which the organic base in Step (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 26 words
The process in Claim 4 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF3(CF2)6-CH2CH20-(CH2CH20)4H.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process in Claim 5 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-(C H 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process in Claim 6 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-(C H 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 42 words
The process in Claim 7 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 O-(CH 2 CH 2 O) 4 H.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process in Claim 8 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-( CH 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process in Claim 9 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-( CH 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 44 words
The process in Claim 10 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-( CH 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 47 words
The process in Claim 11 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is tetramethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (CF 2 ) 6 -C H 2 C H 2 0- ( CH 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 45 words
The process in Claim 4 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is CF 3 (C F 2 ) 6 -CH 2 CH 2 0-(C H 2 CH 2 0 ) 4 H.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 5 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 6 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 7 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 8 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 9 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 25 words
The process in Claim 10 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 27 words
. 30. The process in Claim 11 in which the organic base in Steps (a) and (c) is (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium hydroxide and the surfactant in Step (c) is

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Maintenance schedule is calculated for granted US utility patents.

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag