Patent EP0216135A1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent EP0176410A1 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
EP0176410A1 Expired / Lapsed EP ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for uniquely estimating permeability and skin factor for at least two layers of a reservoir

Assignee: SLB NV
•
Filing: 1985-09-05
•
Granted: —
•
Expires: 2005-09-05
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for layered reservoirs without crossflow in order to estimate individual layer permeabilities and skin factors is disclosed. The method consists of two sequential drawdown tests. During these tests the wellbore pressure and the sandface flow must be measured simultaneously. The permeability and skin factor for each layer are estimated uniquely using measured wellbore pressure and sandface flow rate from these two drawdown tests.

Inventors

  • 👤 Fikri Kucuk
  • 👤 Luis C. Ayestaran

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction EP
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 23:56
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B49/00; E21B49/008

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim 380 words
A well test method for uniquely estimating permeability and skin factor for each of at least two layers of respective thicknesses, h 1 and h 2 , of a reservoir comprising the steps of, positioning a logging tool of a logging system in a wellbore traversing the two layers at the top of the upper layer, said logging system having means for measuring downhole fluid flow rate and pressure as a function of time, changing the surface flow rate from an initial flow rate at an initial time, t l , during a first time interval, measuring and recording the downhole fluid flow rate, q l (t), and downhole pressure, p l (t), during the first interval, t l to t 2 , at the top of the upper layer, positioning said logging tool to the top of the lower layer, measuring and recording the downhole flow rate, q 1 (t 3 ), at time, t 3 , from the top of the lower layer, changing the surface flow rate at time, t 3 , to another flow rate, measuring and recording the downhole fluid flow rate, q 22 (t), and downhole pressure, p 2 (t), during a second interval, t 3 to t 4 , at the top of the lower layer, determining functions and , where where k 1 = permeability of upper layer k 2 = permeability of lower layer by matching the measured change in downhole pressure, Δp 1 (t) = p 1 (t 1 ) - p 1 (t) , with the convolution of the measured fluid flow rate, q 1 (t), and an influence function, Δp sf (t), which is a function of combined-layered permeability, , and skin effect, , determining the permeability,k 2 , of the lower layer and the skin factor, s 2 , of the lower layer by matching the measured fluid flow rate, q 22 (t), with the convolution of the measured change in downhole pressure Δp 2 (t) = p 1 (t 3 ) - p 2 (t) and an influence function f (t) which is a function of the lower layer permeability, k 2 , and skin factor, s 2 , and determining k 1 and s 1 from estimates of k 2 , s2 and and .
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 380 words
A well test method for uniquely estimating permeability and skin factor for each of at least two layers of respective thicknesses, h 1 and h 2 , of a reservoir comprising the steps of, positioning a logging tool of a logging system in a wellbore traversing the two layers at the top of the upper layer, said logging system having means for measuring downhole fluid flow rate and pressure as a function of time, changing the surface flow rate from an initial flow rate at an initial time, t l , during a first time interval, measuring and recording the downhole fluid flow rate, q l (t), and downhole pressure, p l (t), during the first interval, t l to t 2 , at the top of the upper layer, positioning said logging tool to the top of the lower layer, measuring and recording the downhole flow rate, q 1 (t 3 ), at time, t 3 , from the top of the lower layer, changing the surface flow rate at time, t 3 , to another flow rate, measuring and recording the downhole fluid flow rate, q 22 (t), and downhole pressure, p 2 (t), during a second interval, t 3 to t 4 , at the top of the lower layer, determining functions and , where where k 1 = permeability of upper layer k 2 = permeability of lower layer by matching the measured change in downhole pressure, Δp 1 (t) = p 1 (t 1 ) - p 1 (t) , with the convolution of the measured fluid flow rate, q 1 (t), and an influence function, Δp sf (t), which is a function of combined-layered permeability, , and skin effect, , determining the permeability,k 2 , of the lower layer and the skin factor, s 2 , of the lower layer by matching the measured fluid flow rate, q 22 (t), with the convolution of the measured change in downhole pressure Δp 2 (t) = p 1 (t 3 ) - p 2 (t) and an influence function f (t) which is a function of the lower layer permeability, k 2 , and skin factor, s 2 , and determining k 1 and s 1 from estimates of k 2 , s2 and and .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the influence function Δp sf (t) is, where µ = reservoir fluid viscosity, cp = reservoir porosity, fraction r = wellbore radius Ei = Exponential integral.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 35 words
The method of claim 2 whereby the measured change in downhole pressure Δp 1 (t) is matched to the calculated downhole pressure, Δp wf (t), where by minimizing the function where β = [k, s].
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 102 words
The method of claim 1 wherein for the lower layer, the measured fluid flow rate, q 22 (t), is matched with a calculated fluid flow rate n(β,t) according to the relation, where q'D = total normalized rate and the Laplace transform of the relation is, where β 2 = k 2 h 2 /µ C = wellbore storage constant z = the Laplace image space variable r w = wellbore radius K o = modified Bessel function of the second kind and order zero K 1 = modified Bessel function of the second kind and order one µ = reservoir fluid viscosity.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 37 words
The method of claim 4 whereby the measured fluid flow rate q 22 (t) is matched to the calculated fluid flow rate η (β,t) by minimizing the function where S = [k 2 , s 2 ].
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 90 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the well test is for a non-flowing well, and the surface flow rate is increased from a q l (t l ) of zero flow rate at an initial time t 1 to a stabilized flow rate of q 1 (t 2 ) at a time t 2 and is increased from the surface flow rate q 2 (t 3 ) at a time t 3 to a stabilized flow rate of q 2 (t 4 ) at a later time, t 4 .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 87 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the well test is for a flowing well and the surface flow rate is decreased from a q 1 (t 1 ) non-zero flow rate at an initial time t 1 to a stabilized flow rate of q 1 (t 2 ) at a time t 2 and is increased from the surface flow rate from q 1 (t 3 ) at a time t 3 to a stabilized flow rate of q 2 (t 4 ) at a later time.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3321965A Cited
US3636762A Cited
FR2434923A1 Cited
US4328705A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Maintenance schedule is calculated for granted US utility patents.

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag