Patent US3887976A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US3640698A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent EP0073602A2 successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
EP0073602A2 Expired / Lapsed EP ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Combining replicated sub-system outputs

Assignee: Siemens Mobility Ltd
•
Filing: 1982-08-18
•
Granted: —
•
Expires: 2002-08-18
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A system comprising replicated sub-systems (x, Y, Z) the outputs (5, 6, 7) of which are consolidated to provide a single output (9) by a majority voter (8) for reliability and availability. The integrity of the system, i. e. confidence in the single consolidated output (9), is provided by an electronic coincidence checking (10) arrangement which involves several levels of checking. A first level of checking is carried out on all sub-system outputs (5, 6, 7) by circuits in each sub-system channel. Thus, each channel assesses the other channels and itself for coincidence. These assessments (X' Y 1 Z 1 ; X 2 Y 2 Z 2 ; X 3 Y 3 Z 3 ) are then consolidated in respect of each sub-system at a second level and the final result (11, 12, 13) employed as an inhibit or power supply disabling control if a fault is declared in one sub-system.

Inventors

  • 👤 Christopher Robert Brown

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction EP
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 15:20
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F11/00; G06F11/07; G06F11/16; G06F11/18; G06F11/181; G06F11/183; G06F11/184; G06F11/187; H; H03; H03K; H03K19/00; H03K19/20; H03K19/23

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim 158 words
A system comprising a plurality of parallel replicated sub-systems the outputs of which are_ combined by a majority voter to provide a single consolidated output and sub-system output coincidence checking mans to assure integrity of the consolidated output, characterised in that the coincidence checking means (10) comprises apparatus (25x, 25 Y , 25 )in each sub-system channel (X, Y, Z) connected to receive the outputs of all channels (5, 6, 7) and arranged to perform a coincidence checking function and to provide an output to operate a fault indicator (X 1 , Y 1 , Z 1 ; X 2 , Y 2 , Z 2 ; X 3 , Y 3 , Z 3 ) in the event of lack of coincidence with the majority, and apparatus (Fig. 3) for combining the fault indications relating to each sub-system (5, 6, 7) to provide a single consolidated output (11, 12, 13) declaring the integrity of each sub-system channel.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 158 words
A system comprising a plurality of parallel replicated sub-systems the outputs of which are_ combined by a majority voter to provide a single consolidated output and sub-system output coincidence checking mans to assure integrity of the consolidated output, characterised in that the coincidence checking means (10) comprises apparatus (25x, 25 Y , 25 )in each sub-system channel (X, Y, Z) connected to receive the outputs of all channels (5, 6, 7) and arranged to perform a coincidence checking function and to provide an output to operate a fault indicator (X 1 , Y 1 , Z 1 ; X 2 , Y 2 , Z 2 ; X 3 , Y 3 , Z 3 ) in the event of lack of coincidence with the majority, and apparatus (Fig. 3) for combining the fault indications relating to each sub-system (5, 6, 7) to provide a single consolidated output (11, 12, 13) declaring the integrity of each sub-system channel.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 49 words
A system according to Claim 1 further characterised in that the consolidated output (11, 12, 13) declaring the consolidated output declaring the integrity of each sub-system (X, Y, Z) is connected to means (31, 32, 33) for disabling the output (5, 6, 7) of the sub-system (X, Y, Z).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 23 words
A system according to Claim 2 further characterised in that the means for disabling the sub-systèm output comprises an output inhibit ing circuit.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 26 words
A system according to Claim 2 further characterised in that the means for disabling the sub-system output comprises a sub-system power supply control (31, 32, 33).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 26 words
A system according to Claim 1 further characterised in that the apparatus for combining the sub-system coincidence indications comprises a majority voter (Fig. 4a; Fig. 4b).
Claim 7
Independent Claim 132 words
A system according to any proceding claim further characterised in that the apparatus in each sub-system channel for performing the coincidence checking function comprises a data memory, data reading means connected to the ' ulpjt of cach replicated sub-system for reading data in said outputs into the memory, data comparison means for comparing data stored in the memory, a plurality of fault jndicators one for each sub-system which are responsive to the data comparison means, and control means for operating said apparatus in a succession of cycles each of which incled the steps of reading the sub-system output into the data memory comparing The sto ' red :ita and registering a fault in a .4 fault dicaior when a sub-system output f.j-i')g to coincide with a Tajority of the remaining sub-system outputs.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 177 words
A system according to any preceding claim wherein the replicated sub-systems each produce a plurality of outputs which are consolidated by a plurality of : majorify voters for ce nection to a like plurality of control line's forther characteristed in that the fault indicator (X 1 Y 1 , Z 1 ; X 2 , Y 2 , G 2 ; X 3 , Y 3 , z 3 ) cach Y 1 , Z 1 ; X 2 , Y 2 , Z 2 ; X 3 , Y 3 , Z 3 ) in each sub channel is forther connected to be operated by the output of a pulse testing circuit (21 x , 21 Y , 21 z ) wherein said pulse testing circuit 7S connected to inject a test pulse into the sub-system output (22, 23, 24) and is connected to the output majority voter (8) by a feedback connection (34, 35, 36), the testing circuit being arrenged to rempond to the absence of feedLack of iafast pulse O operate the fault indicator.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 200 words
A system according to any pr ''edi;:g clain farther characterised in that a majority voter (Fig. 4b) includes logic AND gating means (41, 44) for a pair of outputs comprising a first light emitting device (48) connected in a first energising circuit (47, 48, 49), a first terminal (X) in the first energising circuit for receiving a first of the pair of outputs capable of occupying a first state which inhibits energisation of the first light emitting device (48) or an alternative second state which permits energisation of the device, a first light responsive switching device (50) connected in a second energising circuit (Y, 50, 51) for a second light emitting device (51), a second terminal (Y) in the second energising circuit for receiving a second of the pair of outputs also capable of occupying a first state which inhibits energisation of the second light emitting device (51) or an alternative second state which permits energisation of the device, a second light responsive switching device (52) connected to provide an output, and in parallel therewith further second light responsive switching devices of similar logic AND gating means (42, 45; 43, 46) for further pairs (X, Z; Y, Z) of outputs.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 200 words
A system according to any pr ''edi;:g clain farther characterised in that a majority voter (Fig. 4b) includes logic AND gating means (41, 44) for a pair of outputs comprising a first light emitting device (48) connected in a first energising circuit (47, 48, 49), a first terminal (X) in the first energising circuit for receiving a first of the pair of outputs capable of occupying a first state which inhibits energisation of the first light emitting device (48) or an alternative second state which permits energisation of the device, a first light responsive switching device (50) connected in a second energising circuit (Y, 50, 51) for a second light emitting device (51), a second terminal (Y) in the second energising circuit for receiving a second of the pair of outputs also capable of occupying a first state which inhibits energisation of the second light emitting device (51) or an alternative second state which permits energisation of the device, a second light responsive switching device (52) connected to provide an output, and in parallel therewith further second light responsive switching devices of similar logic AND gating means (42, 45; 43, 46) for further pairs (X, Z; Y, Z) of outputs.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 50 words
A system according to any preceding claim further characterised in that a majority voter (8) comprises a relay (9) having a plurality of energising coils (27, 28, 29) co-operating with a magnetic circuit arranged so that the relay operates when a majority of the coils (27, 28, 29) are energised.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Maintenance schedule is calculated for granted US utility patents.

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag