US7327238B2
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method, system, and computer program product for determining and reporting tailgating incidents
Assignee: Google LLC
•
Filing: 2005-06-06
•
Granted: 2008-02-05
•
Expires: 2025-06-06
Abstract
Abstract A method, system, and computer program product for detecting a tailgate event between two vehicles moving in a forward motion is provided. The two vehicles include a first and second vehicle, one of the two vehicles being an offending vehicle and the other of the two vehicles being an affected vehicle. The method includes determining a distance between the two vehicles. The first vehicle is ahead of the second vehicle. The method also includes calculating a safe distance range between the two vehicles based upon one or more of speed, weight, and safe braking range values of at least one of the two vehicles. The method further includes comparing the distance and the safe distance range and activating a recording device on the affected vehicle if the distance is less than the safe distance range indicating an unacceptable range value, the offending vehicle being responsible for causing the unacceptable range value.
Inventors
- 👤 Kulvir S. Bhogal
- 👤 Gregory J. Boss
- 👤 II Rick A. Hamilton
- 👤 Alexandre Polozoff
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 02:01
CPC Classifications
G; G08; G08G; G08G1/00; G08G1/01; G08G1/017; G08G1/0175; G08G1/16; G08G1/161
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
282 words
A method for monitoring and detecting a tailgate event between two vehicles moving in a forward motion, the two vehicles comprising a first vehicle and a second vehicle, one of the two vehicles being an offending vehicle and the other of the two vehicles being an affected vehicle, the method comprising: determining a distance between the two vehicles, the first vehicle in front of the second vehicle; calculating a safe distance range between the two vehicles based upon at least one of speed, weight, and safe braking range values of at least one of the two vehicles; comparing the distance and the safe distance range; based upon the comparing, activating a recording device on the affected vehicle if the distance is less than the safe distance range indicating an unacceptable distance range value, the offending vehicle being responsible for causing the unacceptable distance range value; wherein the weight is obtained via at least one of: a memory device that stores the pre-programmed weight; a user input via a weight calibration device; a weigh in motion scale on a roadway, the weight transmitted from the weigh in motion scale to the weighed vehicle over a network via at least one of a monitoring vehicle and a weigh in motion terminal within transmission range of the weighed vehicle, wherein the weighed vehicle is the offending vehicle; and an estimated calculation based upon at least one of a vehicle make and model, a number of attached trailers, and a number of axels, wherein the vehicle make and model, the number of attached trailers, and the number of axels are captured by a camera near the roadway and transmitted over a network to the offending vehicle.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
282 words
A method for monitoring and detecting a tailgate event between two vehicles moving in a forward motion, the two vehicles comprising a first vehicle and a second vehicle, one of the two vehicles being an offending vehicle and the other of the two vehicles being an affected vehicle, the method comprising: determining a distance between the two vehicles, the first vehicle in front of the second vehicle; calculating a safe distance range between the two vehicles based upon at least one of speed, weight, and safe braking range values of at least one of the two vehicles; comparing the distance and the safe distance range; based upon the comparing, activating a recording device on the affected vehicle if the distance is less than the safe distance range indicating an unacceptable distance range value, the offending vehicle being responsible for causing the unacceptable distance range value; wherein the weight is obtained via at least one of: a memory device that stores the pre-programmed weight; a user input via a weight calibration device; a weigh in motion scale on a roadway, the weight transmitted from the weigh in motion scale to the weighed vehicle over a network via at least one of a monitoring vehicle and a weigh in motion terminal within transmission range of the weighed vehicle, wherein the weighed vehicle is the offending vehicle; and an estimated calculation based upon at least one of a vehicle make and model, a number of attached trailers, and a number of axels, wherein the vehicle make and model, the number of attached trailers, and the number of axels are captured by a camera near the roadway and transmitted over a network to the offending vehicle.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method of claim 1 , further comprising: based upon the comparing, activating a timer device on the affected vehicle if the distance is less than the safe distance range; recalculating the distance and the safe distance range; comparing the recalculated distance and safe distance range and generating an incident report if the recalculated distance is less than the recalculated safe distance value for a specified time period measured by the timer, the incident report including results of the recording.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method of claim 2 , wherein the incident report further includes at least one of: a license number of the offending vehicle; a speed of the affected vehicle; safe braking range of the affected vehicle; weight of at least one of the affected vehicle and the offending vehicle; steering maneuvers of the affected vehicle; braking operation of the affected vehicle; and air bag deployment status of the affected vehicle.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 2 , further comprising transmitting the incident report to at least one of: a law enforcement entity; an insurance company; and a registry service or host system.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining a distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle further includes validating the distance using at least one of: a laser range finding device; and optical range marker.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining a distance between the first vehicle and the second vehicle is performed by at least one of a front facing range sensor and a rear-mounted range sensor affixed to the affected vehicle.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method of claim 1 , wherein the weighed vehicle transmits the weight via a transceiver, and wherein further, responsive to receiving the weight at the affected vehicle and determining a distance between the vehicles, the affected vehicle uses the weight to calculate a safe braking distance.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3840848A
Cited
US3949362A
Cited
US4600913A
Cited
US4833469A
Cited
US5066950A
Cited
US5760708A
Cited
US5162794A
Cited
US5166681A
Cited
US5357438A
Cited
US6498620B2
Cited
US5436835A
Cited
US6345228B1
Cited
US6240346B1
Cited
US6233515B1
Cited
US6630888B2
Cited
US6225918B1
Cited
US6401024B1
Cited
US6690268B2
Cited
US6502035B2
Cited
US6597981B2
Cited
US7133661B2
Cited
US6737963B2
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 2011-02-04 | 2011-08-06 | 2012-02-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2015-02-04 | 2015-08-06 | 2016-02-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2019-02-04 | 2019-08-06 | 2020-02-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |