← Back to Patent Explorer
US7302090B2 Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and device for determining the properties of an integrated circuit

Assignee: Synopsys Inc
•
Filing: 2001-11-30
•
Granted: 2007-11-27
•
Expires: 2021-11-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Process for determination of properties, particularly, the integrity, of an integrated circuit by calculation, wherein a calculation-simulated image of the circuit is compared with a design of the circuit, and deviations between the image and design are detected.

Inventors

  • 👤 Christian K. Kalus
  • 👤 Iouri Malov

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 17:45
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/95; G01N21/956; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G03; G03F; G03F1/00; G03F1/36; G06F; G06F30/00; G06F30/20; G06T2207/00; G06T2207/30; G06T2207/30108; G06T2207/30148

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim 244 words
A method for determining integrity of an integrated circuit, comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing the simulated resist image of the circuit with a design of the circuit to obtain predictions about a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; and detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 244 words
A method for determining integrity of an integrated circuit, comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing the simulated resist image of the circuit with a design of the circuit to obtain predictions about a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; and detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method according to claim 1 , further comprising utilizing an intensity distribution in the resist of the form I(x,y,z)=I(x,y)e −αz .
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method according to claim 1 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing γ>>1.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 87 words
A method according to claim 1 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing an equation of the form S ⁡ ( x , y , z ) = 1 r 0 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( E 0 EI ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) γ ⁢ 1 ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ z ) 2 .
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 121 words
The method according to claim 1 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing an equation of the form z ⁡ ( x , y ) = d ⁡ ( 1 - 1 αγ ⁢ ⁢ d ⁢ ln ⁡ ( 1 + D eff ⁢ γ ⁡ ( EI ⁡ ( x , y ) E 0 ) γ ⁢ F ⁡ ( x , y ) ) ) ⁢ ⁢ wherein F ⁡ ( x , y ) = ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ y ) 2 + α 2 .
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method according to claim 1 , further comprising processing a hierarchically structured data input set describing the design and providing the simulated resist image in the form of a hierarchical structuring.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 246 words
Apparatus for determining integrity of an integrated circuit comprising: means for determining a simulated resist image of the integrated circuit, the simulated resist image being determined by an equation in the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity of light used to illuminate the resist at point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; and means for comparing the simulated resist image with a design of the circuit to make predictions concerning a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process, the means for comparing detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, the simulated resist image having a surface function S(x,y,z) describing a uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 246 words
Apparatus for determining integrity of an integrated circuit comprising: means for determining a simulated resist image of the integrated circuit, the simulated resist image being determined by an equation in the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity of light used to illuminate the resist at point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; and means for comparing the simulated resist image with a design of the circuit to make predictions concerning a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process, the means for comparing detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, the simulated resist image having a surface function S(x,y,z) describing a uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 20 words
The apparatus according to claim 7 , an intensity distribution in the resist being of the form I(x,y,z)=I(x,y)e −αz .
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 9 words
The apparatus according to claim 7 , wherein γ>>1.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 87 words
The apparatus according to claim 7 , the means for determining utilizing an equation of the form S ⁡ ( x , y , z ) = 1 r 0 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( E 0 EI ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) γ ⁢ 1 ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ z ) 2 to determine the simulated resist image.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 124 words
The apparatus according to claim 7 , the means for determining utilizing an equation of the form z ⁡ ( x , y ) = d ⁡ ( 1 - 1 α ⁢ ⁢ γ ⁢ ⁢ d ⁢ ln ⁡ ( 1 + D eff ⁢ γ ⁡ ( EI ⁡ ( x , y ) E 0 ) γ ⁢ F ⁡ ( x , y ) ) ) ⁢ ⁢ wherein F ⁡ ( x , y ) = ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ y ) 2 + α 2 to determine the simulated resist image.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 14 words
The apparatus according to claim 7 , further comprising means for automatically changing parameters.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 260 words
A software product comprising instructions, stored on computer-readable media, wherein the instructions, when executed by a computer, perform steps for determining integrity of an integrated circuit, comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold, γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing the simulated resist image of the circuit with a design of the circuit to obtain predictions about a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, and the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 260 words
A software product comprising instructions, stored on computer-readable media, wherein the instructions, when executed by a computer, perform steps for determining integrity of an integrated circuit, comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold, γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing the simulated resist image of the circuit with a design of the circuit to obtain predictions about a circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value, and the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 22 words
The software product according claim 13 , further comprising utilizing an intensity distribution in the resist of the form I(x,y,z)=I(x,y)e −αz .
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 19 words
The software product according to claim 13 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing γ>>1.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 88 words
A software product according to claim 13 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing an equation of the form S ⁡ ( x , y , z ) = 1 r 0 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( E 0 EI ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) γ ⁢ 1 ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ∂ z ) 2 .
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 121 words
The software product according claim 13 , the step of determining the simulated resist image comprising utilizing an equation of the form z ⁡ ( x , y ) = d ⁡ ( 1 - 1 αγ ⁢ ⁢ d ⁢ ln ⁡ ( 1 + D eff ⁢ γ ⁡ ( EI ⁡ ( x , y ) E 0 ) γ ⁢ F ⁡ ( x , y ) ) ) ⁢ ⁢ wherein F ⁡ ( x , y ) = ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ ln ⁢ ⁢ I ⁡ ( x , y ) ∂ y ) 2 + α 2 .
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 33 words
The software product according to claim 13 , further comprising processing a hierarchically structured data input set describing the design and providing the simulated resist image in the form of a hierarchical structuring.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 245 words
An integrated circuit prepared by a process comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing a simulated resist image of the integrated circuit with a design of the integrated circuit to obtain predictions about the integrated circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; and detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value; the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 245 words
An integrated circuit prepared by a process comprising: determining a simulated resist image for an integrated circuit, wherein determining a simulated resist image involves using an equation of the form ( ∂ S ∂ x ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ y ) 2 + ( ∂ S ∂ z ) 2 = ( I ⁡ ( 0 ) I ⁡ ( x , y , z ) ) 2 ⁢ γ ⁢ ( 1 r 0 ) 2 , wherein I(x,y,z) is intensity used to illuminate the resist at a point (x,y,z) of the resist, I(0) is reference intensity obtainable from equation I(0)=E 0 /E, where E is incident light dose in large exposed areas of the resist and E 0 is a threshold , γ is a non-linearity parameter describing non-linearity of one of a developing or resist process, and r 0 is a factor obtainable from equation D eff =r 0 ·t, wherein D eff is effective resist thickness and t is developing time; comparing a simulated resist image of the integrated circuit with a design of the integrated circuit to obtain predictions about the integrated circuit obtainable in a manufacturing process; and detecting deviations between the simulated resist image and the design which differ from a rated value by more than a tolerance value; the simulated resist image having a surface function of the form S(x,y,z) describing uniform propagation of a surface in a resist to be simulated under illumination.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US6091845A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 2010-11-26 2011-05-28 2011-11-27 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2014-11-26 2015-05-28 2015-11-27 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2018-11-26 2019-05-28 2019-11-27 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag