Methods, systems, and programming for computer display of images, text, and/or digital content

Claim 3

A method as in claim 1 wherein: said differences in the shape and pixel alignment of character at said different scale factors cause the relative horizontal width of the font bitmaps of some characters to change at different scale factors; one or more of said text strings are laid out in a horizontal manner; and the relative horizontal width of spacing between individual characters in a given single line strings relative to the horizontal width of characters is changed when displayed at different scale factors to compensate for such change in relative character width.

Claim 4

A method as in claim 1 wherein: the font bitmaps used to represent text at each of said different scale factors are anti-aliased bitmaps that assign a color value to a given screen pixel as a graded function of a coverage value representing the percent of the given pixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; and the shape and pixel alignment of a given character represented by a different font bitmap at each of said different scale factors has been selected to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the font bitmap used at each such the scale factor.

Claim 5

A method as in claim 3 wherein: the screen on which the displays are drawn has pixels comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored subpixels; the anti-aliased font bitmaps used to compose the images of text in said displays are subpixel-optimized bitmaps that assign a luminosity value to a subpixel of a screen pixel having said given arrangement of differently-colored subpixels as a function of: a coverage value representing the percent of the subpixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, a color balancing distribution of a percent of the subpixel's coverage value from said coverage value to coverage values of nearby subpixels, including subpixels of different color, made to prevent a color imbalance that would otherwise result from the difference between the subpixel's coverage value and the coverage values of a given set of one or more nearby subpixels of different colors; and in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, such color balancing distributions to the subpixel's coverage value from one or more nearby subpixels.

Claim 6

A method as in claim 4 wherein said color balancing distributions only distribute portions of a subpixel's coverage value that causes color imbalance within the whole pixel of which it is part.

Claim 7

A method as in claim 3 wherein: said anti-aliased font bitmaps used to represent text at one selected scale factor include small font bitmaps having a small font size of eight pixels per em or less; and the shape and pixel alignment of characters represented in said small font bitmaps have been selected as a function of said small font size to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the small font bitmap.

Claim 8

A method as in claim 6 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of characters of the Roman alphabet within an advance width of 4 pixel columns or less.

Claim 9

A method as in claim 7 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of lowercase letters with an x-height greater than 4 pixels.

Claim 10

A method as in claim 1 : including providing a user interface that allows a user to select a succession of different scale factors selected from among a set of at least two different selectable scale factors; and wherein said displaying is performed at each of said successively selected scale factors.

Claim 11

A method as in claim 1 wherein: the web page's content indicates pixel sizes at which images are to be displayed; and at least two of said selected scale factors causes said display to represent said images at pixel sizes smaller that said indicated sizes.

Claim 12

A method as in claim 1 wherein one or more of said selected scale factors have different component values in a horizontal and a vertical direction, causing the scaling of images and characters to be different in those different directions.

Claim 13

A method as in claim 1 wherein one or more of said selected scale factors have the same value in a horizontal and a vertical directions, causing the scaling of images and characters to be the same in those different directions.

Claim 14

A method as in claim 1 wherein: said display screen has pixels each comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored, differently-positioned subpixels; and the bitmap used to represent a given image accessed as part of a web page in said display of a portion of a web page's layout at a given one of said selected scale factors is a subpixel-optimized image that: is scaled relative to the given accessed imaged as a function of said given selected scale factor; and assigns a luminosity to each differently-colored subpixel in the display of such an image as a function of the amount of luminosity of the given subpixel's color in a source image window in the given accessed image that is associated with the given subpixel; where the source image window associated with each given subpixel has a position relative to the accessed image that corresponds to the position of the given subpixel relative to the subpixel-optimized image, such that the position of the source image windows associated with different subpixels of a given pixel vary in correspondence with the different positions of such subpixels relative to said pixel.

Claim 15

A method as in claim 13 wherein: the bitmaps used to represent a given accessed image in said display at each of two different selected scale factor are two different subpixel-optimized images; and these two different subpixel optimized images assigns luminosity values to subpixels based on source image windows that have different sizes and positions relative to the given accessed image.

Claim 16

A method as in claim 1 wherein: said displayings at said different scale factors are performed on a client computer; the client computer requests a web page from a remote computer over a computer network; said remote computer performs said accessing of the web page's contents; said remote computer performs said laying out of said web page; said remote computer downloads a representation of said images, strings, and layout positions over said computer network to said client computer; and said client computer performs said displaying at each of said different scale factors by drawing said images, strings, and links at positions and sizes on said screen corresponding to those in said layout performed on said remote computer as scaled as a function of said different scale factors.

Claim 17

A method as in claim 15 wherein said made composed from a plurality of separate fonts bitmaps that represents a given single line string is composed by said client computer for the displaying performed at each of said different selected scale factors.

Claim 18

A method as in claim 15 wherein: said remote computer scales the images accessed as part of said web page to produce said scaled bitmaps used to represent said one or more images in the display at a first of said two scale factors, which scaled bitmaps are transmitted to said client computer as part of said download; said client computer performs said displaying for said first scale factor, including representing images in said display with the downloaded image bitmaps that have been scaled for said first scale factors; said client computer has a user interface that allows a user to select to have the layout displayed at a second of said scale factors; and said client computer responds to a selection to display the layout at said second scale factor by displaying the layout of said web page at said second scale factor without a download from said remote client of images scaled for display at said second scale factor.

Claim 19

A method as in claim 17 wherein said client's displaying of the layout of said web page at a second scale factor without download from said remote client of images scaled for said second scale factor includes: re-scaling said images scaled for display at said first scale factor to a size appropriate for display at said second scale factor; and displaying said re-scaled images at positions in said display produced at said second scale factor corresponding to the layout positions of said images at said second scale factor.

Claim 20

A method as in claim 18 wherein: the client computer also responds to said selection to display the layout at said second scale factor by uploading to the remote computer an indication that the remote computer should download images scaled for said second scale factor; in response to the uploading of such an indication, the remote computer: scales the images accessed as part of said web page to produce bitmaps scaled for use in the displaying at said second scale factor; and downloads the images scaled for the second scale factor to said client computer; and after the images scaled for the second scale factor have been downloaded, the client computer uses them to replace, in said display of the layout at said second scale factor, the previously displayed bitmaps that had been re-scaled by the client computer.

Claim 21

A method as in claim 1 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a selected part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first scale factor; and responding to such a drag by performing a zoom-to-fit displaying of said selected part of the web page layout at a second scale factor selected to cause said selected part of said web page layout to have a size that fits the size of said screen.

Claim 22

A method as in claim 20 wherein: the user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a selected part of the web page layout responds to such a drag that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said first scale factor, so as to allow said drag to select as said selected part of the web page layout a part that was either too large or not properly positioned to fit entirely within said screen when the drag first started; and said responding to such a drag performs said zoom-to-fit displaying for the part of the web page layout selected by such a drag.

Claim 23

A method as in claim 1 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to click a pointing device on a selected part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first scale factor; and responding to such a click by performing a displaying of said selected part of the web page layout at a second scale factor that causes said selected part to be shown at a larger size.

Claim 24

A method as in claim 1 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first of said selected scale factor; and responding to such a drag that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said first scale factor.

Claim 25

A method as in claim 1 further including: responding to a press of a pointing device, made at a first layout position relative to a first portion of the web page layout displayed on said screen at a first scale factor, by replacing all or part of the display of said first layout portion with a display of a second, smaller portion of said web page layout, which includes said first position, at a second scale factor that causes said smaller portion to be shown at a larger size; responding to a subsequent releases of said press, made at a selected position relative to the layout shown at said second scale factor, by: acting as if a mouse click had occurred at said selected position relative to said web page layout; and replacing the display of said smaller portion on said screen with a display of the web page layout at said first scale factor.

Claim 26

A method as in claim 24 wherein said replacement of all or part of the display of said first portion of said web page layout with a display of said smaller portion of said layout during the press of said pointing device replaces all of the display of said first portion of said layout.

Claim 27

A method as in claim 24 further including displaying a cursor that indicates the position of the pointing device relative to the portion of said web page layout displayed at said second scale factor during said press, to inform a user of the location that would be treated as said selected position if the pointing device were released at its current location.

Claim 28

A method as in claim 26 wherein: said display screen is a touch screen display; and said cursor is displayed above the point at which the screen is being touched by a pointing device so the cursor can be seen over that pointing device.

Claim 29

A method as in claim 24 wherein said first layout position, which corresponds to the layout position of said pointing device at the time of said press, has substantially the same screen position in said display at said second scale factor made in response to said press as it did in the display at said first scale factor at the time said press was made.

Claim 30

A method as in claim 24 further including responding to movement of the pointing device during said press that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said second scale factor, so as to allow said movement to select as said selected position relative to the layout a position that was not shown on said screen at said second scale when said movement during the press first started.

Claim 31

A method as in claim 1 further including: performing a different displaying of a given portion of said laid out web page that is similar to one of said displayings performed for said at least two different scale factors, except that said different displaying: is performed for a zoomed-out scale factor; and represents said one or more single line string with a greeked bitmap that indicates the size and location of said string in said layout.

Claim 34

A method as in claim 31 wherein: said displaying at said different virtual screen resolutions are performed on a client computer system; the client computer system requests said web page from a remote computer system over a computer network; said remote computer system performs said accessing of the web page; said remote computer system performs said laying out of said web page at each of said virtual screen resolutions; said remote computer system downloads a representation of said images, strings, and layout positions over said computer network to said client computer system for each of said virtual screen resolutions; and said client computer system performs said displaying of said images and strings laid out at each of said virtual screen resolutions by drawing said images, and single line strings at relative positions and sizes on said screen corresponding to those in said layouts performed at each of said virtual screen resolutions on said remote computer system.

Claim 35

A method as in claim 32 wherein said made composed from a plurality of separate fonts bitmaps that represents a given single line string is composed by said client computer system for the layouts performed at each of said virtual screen resolutions from font bitmaps corresponding to the characters of said strings.

Claim 36

A method as in claim 31 wherein: at least in the displaying performed for the layout at one of said virtual screen resolutions, one or more of said single line strings are represented at a font size of 10 pixels per em or less and have individual characters represented by anti-aliased font bitmaps that assign a color value to a given screen pixel as a graded function of a coverage value representing the percent of the given pixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; and the shape and pixel alignment of a character represented by such a font bitmap has been selected to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the font bitmap as a function of the font size of each such a font bitmap.

Claim 37

A method as in claim 34 wherein: the display screen on which displays are drawn has pixels comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored subpixels; the anti-aliased font bitmaps used to represent said text strings at 10 pixels per em or less are subpixel-optimized bitmaps that assign a luminosity value to each given subpixel of said screen as a function of: a coverage value representing the percent of the given subpixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, a color balancing distribution of a percent of a given subpixel's coverage value from said coverage value to coverage values of nearby subpixels, including subpixels of different color, made to a prevent color imbalance that would otherwise result from the difference between the given subpixel's coverage value and the coverage values of a given set of one or more nearby subpixels of different colors; and in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, such color balancing distributions to a given subpixel's coverage value from one or more nearby subpixels.

Claim 38

A method as in claim 35 wherein said color balancing distributions only distribute portions of a subpixel's coverage value that causes color imbalance within the whole pixel of which it is part.

Claim 39

A method as in claim 34 wherein: said anti-aliased font bitmaps include small font bitmaps having a small font size of eight pixels per em or less; and the shape and pixel alignment of characters represented in said small font bitmaps have been selected as a function of said small font size to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the small font bitmap.

Claim 40

A method as in claim 37 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of characters of the Roman alphabet within an advance width of 4 pixel columns or less.

Claim 41

A method as in claim 38 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of lowercase letters with an x-height greater than 4 pixels.

Claim 42

A method as in claim 31 wherein: said display screen has pixels each comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored, differently-positioned subpixels; and the bitmap used to represent a given image, accessed as part of a web page, in said display of a portion of the layout performed at one of said virtual screen resolutions is a subpixel-optimized image that: is scaled relative to the given accessed imaged as a function of said virtual screen resolution; and assigns a luminosity to each differently-colored subpixel in the display of such an image as a function of the amount of luminosity of the given subpixel's color in a source image window in the given accessed image that is associated with the given subpixel; where the source image window associated with each given subpixel has a position relative to the accessed image that corresponds to the position of the given subpixel relative to the subpixel-optimized image, such that the position of the source image windows associated with different subpixels of a given pixel varies in correspondence with the different positions of such subpixels relative to said given pixel.

Claim 43

A method as in claim 40 wherein: the bitmaps used to represent a given accessed image in said displays produced using each of said two different virtual screen resolutions are two different subpixel-optimized images; and these two different subpixel optimized images assigns luminosity values to subpixels based on source image windows that have different sizes and positions relative to the given accessed image.

Claim 44

A computing device comprising: one or more memory devices for storing information, including programming information; one or more processors for processing information in response to said programming information; one or more input devices for receiving inputs from a user that can be supplied to one or more of said processors; a display screen on which information can be shown to a user under control of said one or more processors; wherein said programming information includes programming for causing said computing device, under control of said one or more processors, to perform the following functions: accessing a web page's contents, including one or more images and one or more strings of displayable text, where the contents of said web page do not specify a designated layout position for each of said images and text; laying out the web page in a layout space having a horizontal and a vertical layout resolution, so as to determine a layout position in said layout space for each of said images and each portion of one of said strings that is to be displayed on a separate line in said layout space, said laying out including: treating said images and characters of said displayable text as having respective layout sizes in said layout space; flowing displayable characters of said strings across line boundaries, based on the layout size of said displayable characters, by breaking portions of strings that cross a line boundary into separate single line strings, each of which fits on a single line in said layout space; and displaying at least a portion of said laid out web page in a display shown on a display screen at a selected scale factor, including: displaying both said images and single line character strings at locations in said display corresponding to the positions at which they have been laid out in said layout space, scaled as a function of said selected scale factor; representing each of said images in said display by a corresponding bitmap in said display that has a pixel size relative to the image's layout size determined as a function of said selected scale factor; and representing a given single line strings by an image composed from a plurality of separate font bitmaps representing the characters in said string, where the image of an individual character of said string has a pixel size relative to the character's layout size determined as a function of said selected scale factor; wherein: said displaying of a portion of said laid out web page is performed at each of at least two different selected scale factors; and the shape and pixel alignment of a character represented by one of said font bitmap at a given scale factor has been selected to improve readability as a function of the size of said font bitmap used to represent the character at the given scale factor, causing a given character in a given string in two displayings of a given portion of said web page layout performed at different selected scale factors to be displayed with font bitmaps of different pixel size that represent the given character with different shapes and pixel alignments.

Claim 45

A computing device comprising: one or more memory devices for storing information, including programming information; one or more processors for processing information in response to said programming information; one or more input devices for receiving inputs from a user that can be supplied to one or more of said processors; a display screen on which information can be shown to a user under control of said one or more processors; wherein said programming information includes programming for causing said computing device, under control of said one or more processors, to perform the following functions: accessing a web page's contents, including one or more images and one or more strings of displayable text, where the contents of said web page do not specify a designated layout position for each of said images and text; laying out the web page in a layout space having a horizontal and a vertical layout resolution, so as to determine a layout position in said layout space for each of said images and each portion of one of said strings that is to be displayed on a separate line in said layout space, said laying out including: treating said images and characters of said displayable text as having respective layout sizes in said layout space; flowing displayable characters of said strings across line boundaries, based on the layout size of said displayable characters, by breaking portions of strings that cross a line boundary into separate single line strings, each of which fits on a single line in said layout space; and displaying at least a portion of said laid out web page in a display shown on a display screen at a selected scale factor, including: displaying both said images and single line character strings at locations in said display corresponding to the positions at which they have been laid out in said layout space, scaled as a function of said selected scale factor; representing each of said images in said display by a corresponding bitmap in said display that has a pixel size relative to the image's layout size determined as a function of said selected scale factor; and representing a given single line strings by an image composed from a plurality of separate font bitmaps representing the characters in said string, where the image of an individual character of said string has a pixel size relative to the character's layout size determined as a function of said selected scale factor; wherein: said displaying of a portion of said laid out web page is performed at each of at least two different selected scale factors; and the shape and pixel alignment of a character represented by one of said font bitmap at a given scale factor has been selected to improve readability as a function of the size of said font bitmap used to represent the character at the given scale factor, causing a given character in a given string in two displayings of a given portion of said web page layout performed at different selected scale factors to be displayed with font bitmaps of different pixel size that represent the given character with different shapes and pixel alignments.

Claim 46

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein: said differences in the shape and pixel alignment of character at said different scale factors cause the relative horizontal width of the font bitmaps of some characters to change at different scale factors; one or more of said text strings are laid out in a horizontal manner; and the relative horizontal width of spacing between individual characters in a given single line strings relative to the horizontal width of characters is changed when displayed at different scale factors to compensate for such change in relative character width.

Claim 47

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein: the font bitmaps used to represent text at each of said different scale factors are anti-aliased bitmaps that assign a color value to a given screen pixel as a graded function of a coverage value representing the percent of the given pixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; and the shape and pixel alignment of a given character represented by a different font bitmap at each of said different scale factors has been selected to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the font bitmap used at each such the scale factor.

Claim 48

A computing device as in claim 44 wherein: the display screen on which the displays are drawn has pixels comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored subpixels; the anti-aliased font bitmaps used to compose the images of text in said displays are subpixel-optimized bitmaps that assign a luminosity value to a subpixel of a screen pixel having said given arrangement of differently-colored subpixels as a function of: a coverage value representing the percent of the subpixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, a color balancing distribution of a percent of the subpixel's coverage value from said coverage value to coverage values of nearby subpixels, including subpixels of different color, made to prevent a color imbalance that would otherwise result from the difference between the subpixel's coverage value and the coverage values of a given set of one or more nearby subpixels of different colors; and in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, such color balancing distributions to the subpixel's coverage value from one or more nearby subpixels.

Claim 49

A computing device as in claim 45 wherein said color balancing distributions only distribute portions of a subpixel's coverage value that causes color imbalance within the whole pixel of which it is part.

Claim 50

A computing device as in claim 44 wherein: said anti-aliased font bitmaps used to represent text at one selected scale factor include small font bitmaps having a small font size of eight pixels per em or less; and the shape and pixel alignment of characters represented in said small font bitmaps have been selected as a function of said small font size to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the small font bitmap.

Claim 51

A computing device as in claim 47 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of characters of the Roman alphabet within an advance width of 4 pixel columns or less.

Claim 52

A computing device as in claim 48 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of lowercase letters with an x-height greater than 4 pixels.

Claim 53

A computing device as in claim 42 : including providing a user interface that allows a user to select a succession of different scale factors selected from among a set of at least two different selectable scale factors; and wherein said displaying is performed at each of said successively selected scale factors.

Claim 54

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein: the web page's content indicates pixel sizes at which images are to be displayed; and at least two of said selected scale factors causes said display to represent said images at pixel sizes smaller that said indicated sizes.

Claim 55

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein one or more of said selected scale factors have different component values in a horizontal and a vertical direction, causing the scaling of images and characters to be different in those different directions.

Claim 56

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein one or more of said selected scale factors have the same value in a horizontal and a vertical direction, causing the scaling of images and characters to be the same in those different directions.

Claim 57

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein: said display screen has pixels each comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored, differently-positioned subpixels; and the bitmap used to represent a given image accessed as part of a web page in said display of a portion of a web page's layout at a given one of said selected scale factors is a subpixel-optimized image that: is scaled relative to the given accessed imaged as a function of said given selected scale factor; and assigns a luminosity to each differently-colored subpixel in the display of such an image as a function of the amount of luminosity of the given subpixel's color in a source image window in the given accessed image that is associated with the given subpixel; where the source image window associated with each given subpixel has a position relative to the accessed image that corresponds to the position of the given subpixel relative to the subpixel-optimized image, such that the position of the source image windows associated with different subpixels of a given pixel vary in correspondence with the different positions of such subpixels relative to said pixel.

Claim 58

A computing device as in claim 54 wherein: the bitmaps used to represent a given accessed image in said display at each of two different selected scale factor are two different subpixel-optimized images; and these two different subpixel optimized images assigns luminosity values to subpixels based on source image windows that have different sizes and positions relative to the given accessed image.

Claim 59

A computing device as in claim 42 wherein: said displayings at said different scale factors are performed on a client computer; the client computer requests a web page from a remote computer over a computer network; said remote computer performs said accessing of the web page's contents; said remote computer performs said laying out of said web page; said remote computer downloads a representation of said images, strings, and layout positions over said computer network to said client computer; and said client computer performs said displaying at each of said different scale factors by drawing said images, strings, and links at positions and sizes on said screen corresponding to those in said layout performed on said remote computer as scaled as a function of said different scale factors.

Claim 60

A computing device as in claim 56 wherein said image composed from a plurality of separate fonts bitmaps that represents a given single line string is composed by said client computer for the displaying performed at each of said different selected scale factors.

Claim 61

A computing device as in claim 56 wherein: said remote computer scales the images accessed as part of said web page to produce said scaled bitmaps used to represent said one or more images in the display at a first of said two scale factors, which scaled bitmaps are transmitted to said client computer as part of said download; said client computer performs said displaying for said first scale factor, including representing images in said display with the downloaded image bitmaps that have been scaled for said first scale factors; said client computer has a user interface that allows a user to select to have the layout displayed at a second of said scale factors; and said client computer responds to a selection to display the layout at said second scale factor by displaying the layout of said web page at said second scale factor without a download from said remote client of images scaled for display at said second scale factor.

Claim 62

A computing device as in claim 58 wherein said client's displaying of the layout of said web page at a second scale factor without download from said remote client of images scaled for said second scale factor includes: re-scaling said images scaled for display at said first scale factor to a size appropriate for display at said second scale factor; and displaying said re-scaled images at positions in said display produced at said second scale factor corresponding to the layout positions of said images at said second scale factor.

Claim 63

A computing device as in claim 59 wherein: the client computer also responds to said selection to display the layout at said second scale factor by uploading to the remote computer an indication that the remote computer should download images scaled for said second scale factor; in response to the uploading of such an indication, the remote computer: scales the images accessed as part of said web page to produce bitmaps scaled for use in the displaying at said second scale factor; and downloads the images scaled for the second scale factor to said client computer; and after the images scaled for the second scale factor have been downloaded, the client computer uses them to replace, in said display of the layout at said second scale factor, the previously displayed bitmaps that had been re-scaled by the client computer.

Claim 64

A computing device as in claim 42 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a selected part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first scale factor; and responding to such a drag by performing a zoom-to-fit displaying of said selected part of the web page layout at a second scale factor selected to cause said selected part of said web page layout to have a size that fits the size of said screen.

Claim 65

A computing device as in claim 61 wherein: the user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a selected part of the web page layout responds to such a drag that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said first scale factor, so as to allow said drag to select as said selected part of the web page layout a part that was either too large or not properly positioned to fit entirely within said screen when the drag first started; and said responding to such a drag performs said zoom-to-fit displaying for the part of the web page layout selected by such a drag.

Claim 66

A computing device as in claim 42 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to click a pointing device on a selected part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first scale factor; and responding to such a click by performing a displaying of said selected part of the web page layout at a second scale factor that causes said selected part to be shown at a larger size.

Claim 67

A computing device as in claim 42 further including: providing a user interface that allows a user to drag a pointing device across a part of said web page's layout shown on said screen at a first of said selected scale factor; and responding to such a drag that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said first scale factor.

Claim 68

A computing device as in claim 42 further including: responding to a press of a pointing device, made at a first layout position relative to a first portion of the web page layout displayed on said screen at a first scale factor, by replacing all or part of the display of said first layout portion with a display of a second, smaller portion of said web page layout, which includes said first position, at a second scale factor that causes said smaller portion to be shown at a larger size; responding to a subsequent releases of said press, made at a selected position relative to the layout shown at said second scale factor, by: acting as if a mouse click had occurred at said selected position relative to said web page layout; and replacing the display of said smaller portion on said screen with a display of the web page layout at said first scale factor.

Claim 69

A computing device as in claim 65 wherein said replacement of all or part of the display of said first portion of said web page layout with a display of said smaller portion of said layout during the press of said pointing device replaces all of the display of said first portion of said layout.

Claim 70

A computing device as in claim 65 further including displaying a cursor that indicates the position of the pointing device relative to the portion of said web page layout displayed at said second scale factor during said press, to inform a user of the location that would be treated as said selected position if the pointing device were released at its current location.

Claim 71

A computing device as in claim 67 wherein: said display screen is a touch screen display; and said cursor is displayed above the point at which the screen is being touched by a pointing device so the cursor can be seen over that pointing device.

Claim 72

A computing device as in claim 65 wherein said first layout position, which corresponds to the layout position of said pointing device at the time of said press, has substantially the same screen position in said display at said second scale factor made in response to said press as it did in the display at said first scale factor at the time said press was made.

Claim 73

A computing device as in claim 65 further including responding to movement of the pointing device during said press that extends across a boundary associated with a given edge of said screen by scrolling, onto said screen, across said given screen edge, portions of the web page layout previously not shown on the screen at said second scale factor, so as to allow said movement to select as said selected position relative to the layout a position that was not shown on said screen at said second scale when said movement during the press first started.

Claim 74

A computing device as in claim 42 further including: performing a different displaying of a given portion of said laid out web page that is similar to one of said displayings performed for said at least two different scale factors, except that said different displaying: is performed for a zoomed-out scale factor; and represents said one or more single line string with a greeked bitmap that indicates the size and location of said string in said layout.

Claim 75

A computing device comprising: one or more memory devices for storing information, including programming information; one or more processors for processing information in response to said programming information; one or more input devices for receiving inputs from a user that can be supplied to one or more of said processors; a display screen on which information can be shown to a user under control of said one or more processors; wherein said programming information includes programming for causing said computing device, under control of said one or more processors, to perform the following functions: accessing a web page's content, including one or more images and one or more strings of displayable text; laying out the web page for display at a given virtual screen resolution having a given horizontal and vertical pixel resolution so as to determine a layout position for each of said images and each portion of one of said strings that is to be displayed on a separate line, with said layout positions being determined in a layout space having a virtual pixel width equal to the larger of (a) a minimum width required by the contents of the web page, if such a minimum width exists, or (b) the horizontal resolution of the virtual screen resolution, which ever is larger, said laying out including: treating said images and displayable characters in said displayable text as having respective layout sizes in said layout space; flowing displayable characters of said strings of across line boundaries, based on the layout size of said displayable characters, by breaking portions of strings that cross a line boundary into separate single line strings, each of which fits on a single line in said layout space; and displaying at least a portion of said laid out web page in a display shown on a display screen at a given scale factor, including: displaying both said images and single line character strings at locations in said display corresponding to the positions at which they have been laid out in said layout space, scaled as a function of said given scale factor; representing each of said images in said display by a corresponding bitmap that has a size relative to the image's layout size determined as a function of said given scale factor; representing a given single line strings by an image composed from a plurality of separate font bitmaps representing the characters in said string, where the image of an individual character of said string has a pixel size relative to the character's layout size determined as a function of said given scale factor; performing said layout and displaying of said web page at each of at least two different virtual screen resolutions; wherein: the layout performed at a first, larger, one of said virtual screen resolutions lays out said images and strings at a first, relatively small, set of respective sizes relative to said larger virtual screen resolution; the layout at a second, smaller, one of said virtual screen resolutions lays out said images and strings at a second, relatively large, set of respective sizes relative to said smaller virtual screen resolution; and the given scale factors used, respectively, in the displayings performed at the first and second virtual screen resolutions are such that the images and text appear at smaller pixel sizes in the display of the layout produced using said larger virtual screen resolution and appear at larger pixel sizes in the display of the layout produced using said smaller virtual screen resolution; and the layout at the smaller virtual screen resolution makes text lines shorter relative to the size of fonts shown on those lines.

Claim 76

A computing device comprising: one or more memory devices for storing information, including programming information; one or more processors for processing information in response to said programming information; one or more input devices for receiving inputs from a user that can be supplied to one or more of said processors; a display screen on which information can be shown to a user under control of said one or more processors; wherein said programming information includes programming for causing said computing device, under control of said one or more processors, to perform the following functions: accessing a web page's content, including one or more images and one or more strings of displayable text; laying out the web page for display at a given virtual screen resolution having a given horizontal and vertical pixel resolution so as to determine a layout position for each of said images and each portion of one of said strings that is to be displayed on a separate line, with said layout positions being determined in a layout space having a virtual pixel width equal to the larger of (a) a minimum width required by the contents of the web page, if such a minimum width exists, or (b) the horizontal resolution of the virtual screen resolution, which ever is larger, said laying out including: treating said images and displayable characters in said displayable text as having respective layout sizes in said layout space; flowing displayable characters of said strings of across line boundaries, based on the layout size of said displayable characters, by breaking portions of strings that cross a line boundary into separate single line strings, each of which fits on a single line in said layout space; and displaying at least a portion of said laid out web page in a display shown on a display screen at a given scale factor, including: displaying both said images and single line character strings at locations in said display corresponding to the positions at which they have been laid out in said layout space, scaled as a function of said given scale factor; representing each of said images in said display by a corresponding bitmap that has a size relative to the image's layout size determined as a function of said given scale factor; representing a given single line strings by an image composed from a plurality of separate font bitmaps representing the characters in said string, where the image of an individual character of said string has a pixel size relative to the character's layout size determined as a function of said given scale factor; performing said layout and displaying of said web page at each of at least two different virtual screen resolutions; wherein: the layout performed at a first, larger, one of said virtual screen resolutions lays out said images and strings at a first, relatively small, set of respective sizes relative to said larger virtual screen resolution; the layout at a second, smaller, one of said virtual screen resolutions lays out said images and strings at a second, relatively large, set of respective sizes relative to said smaller virtual screen resolution; and the given scale factors used, respectively, in the displayings performed at the first and second virtual screen resolutions are such that the images and text appear at smaller pixel sizes in the display of the layout produced using said larger virtual screen resolution and appear at larger pixel sizes in the display of the layout produced using said smaller virtual screen resolution; and the layout at the smaller virtual screen resolution makes text lines shorter relative to the size of fonts shown on those lines.

Claim 77

A computing device as in claim 72 wherein: said displayings at said different virtual screen resolutions are performed on a client computer system; the client computer system requests said web page from a remote computer system over a computer network; said remote computer system performs said accessing of the web page; said remote computer system performs said laying out of said web page at each of said virtual screen resolutions; said remote computer system downloads a representation of said images, strings, and layout positions over said computer network to said client computer system for each of said virtual screen resolutions; and said client computer system performs said displaying of said images and strings laid out at each of said virtual screen resolutions by drawing said images, and single line strings at relative positions and sizes on said screen corresponding to those in said layouts performed at each of said virtual screen resolutions on said remote computer system.

Claim 78

A computing device as in claim 73 wherein said image composed from a plurality of separate fonts bitmaps that represents a given single line string is composed by said client computer system for the layouts performed at each of said virtual screen resolutions from font bitmaps corresponding to the characters of said strings.

Claim 79

A computing device as in claim 72 wherein: at least in the displaying performed for the layout at one of said virtual screen resolutions, one or more of said single line strings are represented at a font size of 10 pixels per em or less and have individual characters represented by anti-aliased font bitmaps that assign a color value to a given screen pixel as a graded function of a coverage value representing the percent of the given pixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; and the shape and pixel alignment of a character represented by such a font bitmap has been selected to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the font bitmap as a function of the font size of each such a font bitmap.

Claim 80

A computing device as in claim 75 wherein: the display screen on which displays are drawn has pixels comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored subpixels; the anti-aliased font bitmaps used to represent said text strings at 10 pixels per em or less are subpixel-optimized bitmaps that assign a luminosity value to each given subpixel of said screen as a function of: a coverage value representing the percent of the given subpixel that is covered by a character shape being represented by the font bitmap; in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, a color balancing distribution of a percent of a given subpixel's coverage value from said coverage value to coverage values of nearby subpixels, including subpixels of different color, made to a prevent color imbalance that would otherwise result from the difference between the given subpixel's coverage value and the coverage values of a given set of one or more nearby subpixels of different colors; and in the case of at least some subpixels of said font bitmaps, such color balancing distributions to a given subpixel's coverage value from one or more nearby subpixels.

Claim 81

A computing device as in claim 76 wherein said color balancing distributions only distribute portions of a subpixel's coverage value that causes color imbalance within the whole pixel of which it is part.

Claim 82

A computing device as in claim 75 wherein: said anti-aliased font bitmaps include small font bitmaps having a small font size of eight pixels per em or less; and the shape and pixel alignment of characters represented in said small font bitmaps have been selected as a function of said small font size to increase the degree of alignment of edges of the character shape with pixel boundaries of the small font bitmap.

Claim 83

A computing device as in claim 78 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of characters of the Roman alphabet within an advance width of 4 pixel columns or less.

Claim 84

A computing device as in claim 79 wherein the font bitmaps of said small font size represent a majority of lowercase letters with an x-height greater than 4 pixels.

Claim 85

A computing device as in claim 72 wherein: said display screen has pixels each comprised of a given arrangement of separately-addressable, differently-colored, differently-positioned subpixels; and the bitmap used to represent a given image, accessed as part of a web page, in said display of a portion of the layout performed at one of said virtual screen resolutions is a subpixel-optimized image that: is scaled relative to the given accessed imaged as a function of said virtual screen resolution; and assigns a luminosity to each differently-colored subpixel in the display of such an image as a function of the amount of luminosity of the given subpixel's color in a source image window in the given accessed image that is associated with the given subpixel; where the source image window associated with each given subpixel has a position relative to the accessed image that corresponds to the position of the given subpixel relative to the subpixel-optimized image, such that the position of the source image windows associated with different subpixels of a given pixel varies in correspondence with the different positions of such subpixels relative to said given pixel.

Claim 86

A computing device as in claim 81 wherein: the bitmaps used to represent a given accessed image in said displays produced using each of said two different virtual screen resolutions are two different subpixel-optimized images; and these two different subpixel optimized images assigns luminosity values to subpixels based on source image windows that have different sizes and positions relative to the given accessed image.